Okay, here is the full story if anyone is about
I was initially told the property had had the lease extended
I was then told they were in the process of doing it
Later on, I was told that actually they weren't making any headway because they couldn't get hold of the freeholder, which frankly I didn't believe.
I would not have cared about an 89 year lease anyway (and the property is somewhat underpriced).
Today I am being told that the process hasn't really been started.
I am actually thinking that the property is sufficiently underpriced to count for the necessary lease extension. It's by far the biggest place I have seen in my price range. It's a two bed and most one beds are coming in more expensive than this.
I know my solicitor will warn me against buying it now.
I am interested to know what you guys think. I see other flats in the building have sold and they seem to be on 189 year leases. I wonder if the vendor just couldn't face doing it...said she would in order to market it.
It's not a huge amount different than places going for best and final.
My rational brain is saying chain free, I can extend the lease, it will be hellish trying to look again....my irrational brain is saying that there's something a little off here.