We have worked with architect to design our proposed extension. We’ve applied for and received pp and put it out to tender.
So far we’ve received 3 out of 4 quotes and all of them are nearly double the budget originally discussed.
First time dealing with anything like this so I am extremely naive. I’m hoping more experienced posters might know more.
All 3 quotes are within 10k of each other so I’m assuming that is just what it costs to do what we’ve asked. But if that’s the case, shouldn’t the architect have guided us a bit better?
On the other hand, each tender varies widely on individual costs which makes me think that there’s some kind of ballpark figure calculator that they’re using.
But if there is, shouldn’t the architect be using it too?
He’s saying that the next step is to negotiate with the builder, but if all the builders are agreed on price, more or less, my assumption is that there can’t be much movement possible in the price so instead we lose quality?
I don’t know what I should do at this point. I’m feeling very frustrated that we’ve paid several thousand for a design that is unworkable in our budget. I don’t think that our house value justifies the expenditure either. But am I naive in thinking that way too? Should I be talking to an estate agent rather than an architect?
I feel like I’m missing some obvious step in the process somewhere.
If he’d said at the start, that our budget was completely unrealistic we wouldn’t have paid him several thousand for surveying, designing and whatnot.
And if I understood how the costs are calculated we could design within our budget. But how do you find that out, if not from an architect?