Thanks for everyone's experience, helps me figure things out.
Our situation is, we are planning on buying in an extremely affordable area. We are planning on buying in this cheap area and borrowing less than half of what we could potentially borrow, mortgage wise, so we have more disposable income and to keep emergency money situations less stressful all round. At least for the next 5 years when we'd think about moving to a more expensive area in time for the DC to start secondary school. We already have all our own furniture. Our jobs are secure, but if an imaginary scenario occured where one of us lost their job (not putting anything past my imagination after the current pandemic) then the other could afford the mortgage by doing overtime, and the other would find emergency minimum wage work easily, and minimum wage would be enough to pay the low cost mortgage. Isn't there interest only options available for emergencies too?
We wouldn't buy a house that needed obvious major work doing unless we had saved in advance for that scenario. In the unlikely event the boiler broke the first week we moved in, then we could live without it until pay day, when we'd have enough to buy a budget one or spread the cost of a more expensive one.
It just doesn't make much sense to me to keep saving another year or two or three like others have said they did to have a bigger deposit plus emergency savings, when in that time we would be wasting thousands in rent. Wouldn't it be best to buy as cheap as possible as soon as possible, and have all that rent money in equity?
An I really being particularly risk averse, or is my plan less risky when mortgage payments would be low? We could save an emergency fund much more quickly if we weren't paying rent so the only risky time would be very short term.
I haven't made any decisions yet, but like to work out all scenarios.