This thread isn't an accurate report of what the issues actually are - nor what the teacher herself admitted to be true.
She's not in trouble because a child had an accident with a glue gun.
As per her own admission, she's in trouble because she allowed children to use a glue gun without proper supervision and without doing a risk assessment. She didn't ensure that the child received medical attention for a burn.
Scoff all you like, the CHILD sustained a burn on his hand. Without being properly checked, burns can get infected and become very nasty. Luckily it was a small area but a child still sustained a burn from using equipment at school - while not properly supervised. Additionally, the teacher basically shrugged when the child didn't go and get the injury treated. Children don't get to decide that they're not going to the medical room if they're injured.
Anyway, continuing with the reasons why the teacher was disciplined....
The teacher was on gate duty which is why she didn't tell the parent that her child had burned their hand - and that it hadn't been treated or checked. Nor did she fill in an injury slip - which is part of the mandatory risk management process in every school I've ever known. The accident book was not filled in either. The injury was not recorded anywhere - even after she had dealt with the "safeguarding issue" - which seems to have been the fact that some vulnerable children weren't collected from school.
The teacher admitted all of the above.
Lots of us think that teachers have a tough job. And they do. But they also have a duty to follow proper risk protocols. A child was hurt while in her care, and she's admitted failing to have the proper safeguards in place. She also admitted that she didn't inform anyone of the injury, nor log it in the accident book/fill in an accident slip.
At what point do we say - aaah, don't worry about it, you were busy. That injury probably wasn't a big deal. That's not the teacher's decision to make. The child had a burn on their hand and that needed to be properly recorded.
What if the child had fallen and banged his head, but seemed OK? But then later ended up unconscious with serious injuries? What if the child had fallen and seemed to be OK but had actually broken a bone (which is what happened to my DS - fractured elbow and no one noticed)? What if the teacher was too busy to log those injuries - would that be OK too? It's the principle of the matter and her failure to do what she was supposed to.
At what point do we say that it doesn't matter that the teacher a) failed to follow agreed safety protocols for using certain equipment b) failed to inform the parent of an injury that occurred and c) failed to record the injury anywhere? Do we just let teachers decide when they're going to tell parents and when they're too busy to follow the proper procedures?
It's perfectly possible for lots of things to be true simultaneously. The parent sounds like an arse, and it sounds like a huge overreaction to a single incident. However, the teacher also failed to follow basic safeguarding protocols and disciplinary action was warranted. The extent of the injury is somewhat irrelevant - an injury did occur, and there are processes in place for very good reasons which the teacher failed to follow. Which she admitted.
The teacher wasn't disciplined because a child hurt their hand using a glue gun. The teacher got in trouble because she failed to follow the risk and safety protocols in place. Very big difference. And unfortunately, that's on her.