@plusauamoins not generally. For context I teach and lecture in my line of work and feel there is no difference in teaching a 3 year old vs a 40 year old. But disclaimer I'm not an expert on child development.
In teaching I believe in 2 things (gained from experience but summarised by others as): "...involve me and I will learn..." (Benjamin Franklin) and the swimmer's body illusion (we enjoy what we are good at not the other way around). On the second point keeping slightly ahead on certain subjects at home and suddenly it's DS's favourite.
So the games and tools I use are very much bespoke: map reading, single board computing, Lego, chess (tactics rather than games). Being opportunistic around things DS is interested in and actively play together not just use that as a chance to rest.
So as a step I learn the material in advanced, observe DS's motivation and include the material in what he wants to do.
@gaston25 my mum was the opposite of a helicopter parent. She was as hands off as you can imagine and for me... that is also a trauma. Every question I had for my mum she told me to read a book.
One example is chess. I started learning at the same age as DS with no adults I could ask for help, within 1 year he was better than me over 10+ of playing everyday (he could ask me or others to explain things).
We are born with 2 core motivations out of the womb. Children want to exercise and learn without adults around. I feel if we prescribe the exact approach to learning we become tigers but if we enhance or capitalise and what they're already doing we can get a good balance.
In theory atom is close to the online phase of the 7+ but I do try to break out of the prescribed learning approach for the reasons above.
Sorry for the rant I probably haven't helped sorry!