I think some schools have poor assessment policies and teachers are unsure about how to assess progress made without levels but by now this really should be running fairly smoothly and the new curriculum is no excuse. I think parents can ask more questions about progress. You can ask how the teacher has arrived at this judgement and what the child would need to do to exceed expected. What work would the teacher set to challenge the child?
or don't insist they spend their time constructing woffly answers to meaningless questions, and just let them get on and teach - how about that?
teachers are unsure about how to assess progress made without levels
with or without levels, this is never going to be a precise science, children just are not made to neatly fit into discrete categories like that.
by now this really should be running fairly smoothly
why? the old system never ran smoothly, why would this one ? You are never going to get a perfect answer to the question "what level is my child?", not because of the teacher being poor at working out the answer, but because there isn't actually an answer.
the new curriculum is no excuse.
excuse for what? Who needs an excuse.? As I said there IS no actual perfect answer, so why would anyone need an excuse for not providing one? ALL these assessments are approximate.
You can ask how the teacher has arrived at this judgement I can tell you that here and now, they will have made their best guess, on the limited evidence available, with the imperfect level descriptors, in the tiny time allocation, that is how they will have done it.
what the child would need to do to exceed expected achieve more
What work would the teacher set to challenge the child? that would be the next bit on, from the bit they've just done...
all this is silly, really silly!