I've always been broadly supportive of the idea of primary schools setting homework as it seems reasonable to reinforce concepts taught at school. However the new system introduced by my dc's school has made me question the whole concept. I bloody loathe the whole thing, despite thinking it seemed a good idea when they first started doing it.
Basically, they are given a whole half term's worth of homework in one go and expected to hand it in at the end of the half term. Usually it consists of a bunch of worksheets and a 'project' to do.
I thought the whole point of homework (if there is a point) is to support what they're learning in class? With this system there appears to be little overlap between what they're doing at school and the homework - how can there be when they're given 7/8 weeks' work in the first week?!
Twice now my dc has been set totally inappropriate homework for his ability which we then have to discuss with the teacher and ask for it to be replaced (which doesn't happen). I doubt most parents would bother and it will be a whole half term before the teacher will realise the mistake.
The project always involves extensive parental input, and it is not clear to me what they are supposed to be learning from it.
You also have to really keep on top of where they're up to with their pack of work. Instead of having a nice routine where you know they will get x homework on y day and need to complete it by z, there's now a big window of opportunity to do it or not do it. The amount of work to do (7 weeks' worth) seems overwhelming to a primary aged child and so IME they find it difficult to get started. And if you don't get started early on in the term you have a huge amount to catch up on by the end of term - nightmare!
My biggest objection is that it's supposed to get them ready for homework at secondary school, but the local secondary school doesn't set homework this way - I don't know of any secondary school that would do this!
Would be really interested to hear what other people think of this.