Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Primary education

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Bit worried ds reading.

157 replies

Moonfacesmother · 01/04/2014 19:58

Ds is in reception, he was reading dandelion readers and was on unit 17 which is apparently yellow band equivalent. He was doing well and has a lot of high frequency words and could sound out the unfamiliar words as the dandelion readers are entirely phonetic.

However apparently his school only have them to to unit 17 and now he's finished all the ones they have they have given him a red band reader and he can't read it! He can read the high frequency words but when he comes to words he can't sound out he's lost and he's getting frustrated because he could sound out the words in the other books. The book we have had this week has words like "tastes" "whoosh" "house" "dance"
I know you can in theory sound these out but ds doesn't seem to have covered split vowel digraphs at all so he struggles whenever he comes to one.

Any advice or is it basically like starting again?!

OP posts:
Oakmaiden · 02/04/2014 19:29

I think bauhaus' point is that since she doesn't know the phonological code which would allow her to decode word with uncommon phonic roots it, ergo, must be impossible.

Feenie · 02/04/2014 19:32

I do quite often, in fact. But I always allow the buns a couple of free strikes, rude not to.

Collum, that made me laugh Grin

columngollum · 02/04/2014 19:34

How did you get all that from one non-poem?

Oakmaiden · 02/04/2014 19:35

I used it as an inferential text... Wink

columngollum · 02/04/2014 19:37

Isn't it a tad early for postmodernism?

Feenie · 02/04/2014 19:37

G & T, obviously Wink

mrz · 02/04/2014 19:39

I don't think bauhausfan's posting a meme has anything to do with buns more of a red herring

LindyHemming · 02/04/2014 19:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

columngollum · 02/04/2014 19:39

Is that the one one opens (in which case I think I'll join her) or is she just clever?

mrz · 02/04/2014 19:40

but MN is much cheaper Euphemia

Feenie · 02/04/2014 19:41

Grin Euphemia!

columngollum · 02/04/2014 19:43

No, euphemia, mn isn't like that at all. When we argue here there's a perfectly valid reason for it. Those people were just being silly.

LindyHemming · 02/04/2014 19:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

maizieD · 02/04/2014 20:06

I disagree; I think it's neither an argument nor a contradiction.

No, cg. She said that the collection of sentences showed that she had a valid point. Some of us are agog to know what the point was as her original 'point' was about some words being 'phonetically irregular' but the words in the sentences were fine...

mrz · 02/04/2014 20:13

Do you not teach heteronyms in secondary maizieD? Wink

columngollum · 02/04/2014 20:15

Maybe she's one of the ones who requires a long introduction. I'm sure the argument will be worth waiting for.

LowCloudsForming · 02/04/2014 20:18

It sounds to me as though he needs some intensive phonics practice. Ask his teacher what you can do to help support his phonics learning at home. You could also create a bank of tricky words for him to learn by sight and increase his confidence/speed which will also then help him get the sense of a whole sentence. First port of call: teacher.

mrz · 02/04/2014 20:23

He can read but the school is providing books beyond his current level of knowledge - it's like expecting him to complete questions involving numbers to a million when he's only mastered 0-9

LowCloudsForming · 02/04/2014 20:25

I really think you need to ask the teacher if you can have a chat about your concerns. There must be reading material in school that is appropriate to his reading ability. If not, you should take it to the HT.

Feenie · 02/04/2014 20:36

I don't think she's capable without the personal attacks, but we'll see.

LowCloudsForming · 02/04/2014 20:41

? \posted on the wrong thread Feenie?

Oakmaiden · 02/04/2014 20:46

Think Feenie was responding to maizieD, and referring to bauhaus

Feenie · 02/04/2014 20:48

Thanks, Oakmaiden - see, G&T!

columngollum · 02/04/2014 20:51

Well, well, well, maybe there is something more to this reading malarky after all.

Oakmaiden · 02/04/2014 21:23