Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Primary education

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Bit worried ds reading.

157 replies

Moonfacesmother · 01/04/2014 19:58

Ds is in reception, he was reading dandelion readers and was on unit 17 which is apparently yellow band equivalent. He was doing well and has a lot of high frequency words and could sound out the unfamiliar words as the dandelion readers are entirely phonetic.

However apparently his school only have them to to unit 17 and now he's finished all the ones they have they have given him a red band reader and he can't read it! He can read the high frequency words but when he comes to words he can't sound out he's lost and he's getting frustrated because he could sound out the words in the other books. The book we have had this week has words like "tastes" "whoosh" "house" "dance"
I know you can in theory sound these out but ds doesn't seem to have covered split vowel digraphs at all so he struggles whenever he comes to one.

Any advice or is it basically like starting again?!

OP posts:
storynanny · 01/04/2014 22:46

Moonfacesmother, love the nickname by the way, have you been able to get anything from this thread? Phonics threads always end up as argy bargy between all of the experts! Bit of a pain really as they forget what the original question was.
I would suggest that you make an appointment to see the teacher and talk through your concerns and questions. That is what I would hope oarents of cbildren I teach would feel able to do.

storynanny · 01/04/2014 22:48

Parents not oarents of course.

bauhausfan · 01/04/2014 22:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Feenie · 01/04/2014 22:55

Phonics threads always end up as argy bargy between all of the experts

Only one expert has posted thus far, and has been extremely helpful to the OP.

The other, self-proclaimed one is woefully ignorant of the latest reading research and is also extremely rude.

'Classroom assistant'

Feenie · 01/04/2014 22:58

you still don't understand how children learn to read.

Soooo - how many hundreds of children have you taught to read, Bauhaus?

OohInteresting · 01/04/2014 22:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:02

The basic point is that children can and do decode these words using their knowledge of sound spelling correspondences with ease

bauhausfan · 01/04/2014 23:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LindyHemming · 01/04/2014 23:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:04

I don't need to clarify thanks

bauhausfan · 01/04/2014 23:05

And Feenie - did mrz message you to 'back her up on here? Sad :(

LindyHemming · 01/04/2014 23:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

bauhausfan · 01/04/2014 23:07

Et tu Euphemia? I am an English teacher, GCSE examiner and private tutor so I've taught loads.

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:07

Yes it's about teaching children to read Hmm the ops child is learning to read and is being given texts containing words they can't read yet

OohInteresting · 01/04/2014 23:07

No, Mrz. That's not so. Phonics International hold regular CPD courses to clarify this matter - alongside others that teachers, classroom assistants, etc. may have misunderstood. They also have a forum that you may find helpful: www.phonicsinternational.com/forum/index.php

bauhausfan · 01/04/2014 23:08

mrz is wrong and it is sad that she is too ignorant of her own subject to realise this.

LindyHemming · 01/04/2014 23:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:08

No bauhausfan MHz didn't message anyone is that what you do?

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:09

I don't use phonicsinternation so it's not relevant

OohInteresting · 01/04/2014 23:09

It's very sad that those responsible for educating aren't keen to clarify misconceptions to ensure that they are not misguiding and undermining the principles that they're supposed to be passing onto our children.

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:11

Thanks for the suggestion but I teach CPD courses

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:14

You seem to be confusing high frequency words with sight words they aren't synonymous

OohInteresting · 01/04/2014 23:15

Hahaha
Not that one - and clearly not appropriately. How many other teachers are you misinforming as a result of your misunderstanding. Even if you can't admit that you're not correct on this forum, please (for the good of those you're teaching - as well as the parents and teachers you're influencing on the CPD courses that you're running), clarify things at source.

mrz · 01/04/2014 23:16

Perhaps you need to clarify what high frequency words are

OohInteresting · 01/04/2014 23:17

No confusion there. I'm referring to those high frequency words that do not confirm to grapheme/morpheme correspondence - not to ALL HF words.
Since this is now of no use to OP and you're unable / unwilling to be gently guided on this one, I'll leave you to it. All the best.

Swipe left for the next trending thread