Ok, this is going to seem odd as I'm a secondary teacher myself, so I should know the 'system' but I'm not sure how to broach this one.
My DS1 is in year 2 and has been moved to a lower 'group' in his class. When we asked why, the teacher said it was so that he could have 1:1 support with his handwriting- fair enough, it is bad (to the point that we've considered having him tested for dyspraxia). But she assured DH he would still be pushed in line with his ability. OK, if that works, I totally see her reasoning, and she's brilliant for getting my DS the support he needs.
However, the homework he's brought home this week is way below what he's been doing. He could have completed it 2 years ago- albeit with messy writing.
I am meeting with her on Wednesday to discuss his progress, and I want to tell her that she has spectacularly missed the point with my son. Obviously this will not go sown well, but I'm certain I'm right.
She seems to judge his ability based on the fact that he cannot physically write very well- he therefore rarely finishes his work. This means he doesn't get onto more difficult stuff. So he's not progressing. Now I'm not one of those mothers who thinks 'all her geese are swans' but my son is on the higher side of average when it comes to literacy. It is clear to me that it is the physical act of writing he struggles with, not the understanding behind it.
I know handwriting is an issue, but it's a side issue, surely? He should be taught at his ability level and given handwriting practice on top?
As a teacher, though, I know we are often defensive when accused of being 'wrong' by a parent. I don't want to be 'that woman who thinks she knows best'. Any advice (from primary teachers or parents who've dealt with similar) on how best to broach this for the best outcome? I just want to get the best for my son.