My wife and I disagree. I think our children's pocket-money should be a set amount, contingent on their doing regular piano practice, and deductions made for not doing so.
She (of the "children respond better to positive encouragement" school) says we should pay them a portion of their pocket-money every time they practice.
I say: "Bollocks to that. They are already hugely privileged to have piano lessons as it is, they shouldn't have to be paid to practice."
She says: "You're proposing paying them them anyway. You're just taking it away when they don't, reinforcing a negative blah blah blah..."
Who's right?