Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Preppers

Prepping for Nuclear attack

107 replies

ChedderGorgeous · 28/01/2024 14:52

The ultimate preparation question. But is there any point? I would suggest no.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Naptrappedmummy · 28/01/2024 14:52

None whatsoever we would be dust. Or poisoned

Nellieinthebarn · 28/01/2024 14:53

I live a few miles from GCHQ, so no point at all! In fact I'd rather be dust than die from radiation poisoning or burns.

MrsTerryPratchett · 28/01/2024 14:55

Iodine I suppose. Which we have for water anyway. But really, find the tallest building, get to the top and watch the fireworks.

I know you're supposed to have something white, a door I think was the suggestion, and hide under it. At least from what I remember in the 70s. But if you live in a major population centre or near anything important (and that's most of the UK) you're buggered.

ChedderGorgeous · 28/01/2024 14:56

Let's say you live in the Isle of skye or somewhere. Now is it worth prepping anything ? I guess there is a potential argument

OP posts:
Neriah · 28/01/2024 14:58

A stock pile of drugs, just in case I survive the blast....

NewYearNewCalendar · 28/01/2024 15:04

ChedderGorgeous · 28/01/2024 14:56

Let's say you live in the Isle of skye or somewhere. Now is it worth prepping anything ? I guess there is a potential argument

Specifically, perhaps iodine. We used to have it when we lived abroad near ish to a potentially dodgy nuclear power station.

Thats the only thing I can think of that’s specific to nuclear. Otherwise, you’re either going to survive and deal with the shit show, or you’re not. Don’t think you can really influence which of those you are.

Littlecatsfeet · 28/01/2024 15:10

I think the best prep would be to move somewhere less likely to get attacked. Otherwise, nothing special you can do (unless you have the resources to build a bunker, perhaps).

MrsTerryPratchett · 28/01/2024 15:23

ChedderGorgeous · 28/01/2024 14:56

Let's say you live in the Isle of skye or somewhere. Now is it worth prepping anything ? I guess there is a potential argument

Iodine and tinned food. And a way to keep warm when the weather changes. Anything fished, foraged or grown will be contaminated. Frankly, sounds miserable.

EasternStandard · 28/01/2024 15:26

If it’s anything like Threads it looks like misery

Coyoacan · 28/01/2024 15:27

I wouldn't want to be the last human left

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 28/01/2024 15:29

Iodine is only needed for under 30s.

You'll need to hide away from fallout for up to 14 days so will need enough food and water for that long. Also have a long or medium wave radio. FM radios will cease to work.

Tap water in containers is better than bottled water.

IncompleteSenten · 28/01/2024 15:32

Enough helium to gently suffocate 4 adults.

gamerchick · 28/01/2024 15:34

There's no point in prepping for a NW. I wouldn't want to survive one, I know that.

IcedupTulip · 28/01/2024 15:34

Honestly, who would even want to survive it? The world would be completely different. I’m guessing they’d be little to no medications so most of my family would die anyway even if we survived initially.

Bubbleohseven · 28/01/2024 15:35

Nellieinthebarn · 28/01/2024 14:53

I live a few miles from GCHQ, so no point at all! In fact I'd rather be dust than die from radiation poisoning or burns.

Me too. Hopefully it will be the first place attacked and land right on my head.

Naptrappedmummy · 28/01/2024 15:36

Would you want to survive? In chaos, no medical care, slow radiation poisoning, nothing to eat because the animals and crops are mostly dead? The idea of clinging on like that is much worse, to me.

Bubbleohseven · 28/01/2024 15:36

ChedderGorgeous · 28/01/2024 14:56

Let's say you live in the Isle of skye or somewhere. Now is it worth prepping anything ? I guess there is a potential argument

I doubt anyone would want to survive anyway, even if they were healthy.

Posypointshoes · 28/01/2024 15:37

Wouldn’t bother. In fact I’d prep for the opposite - not to survive. Can’t think of anything worse (if we were directly attacked). But we are thirty minutes outside of London by train so I would hope we would go boom if the UK was targeted.

BarelyLiterate · 28/01/2024 15:42

No point whatsoever.

The best possible outcome of a nuclear war is for you and your loved ones to be obliterated in the first few minutes. There would be absolutely nothing worth surviving for.

FixTheBone · 28/01/2024 15:42

You can use Nukemap to simulate fallout and blast radii etc to determine if you'd survive the primary blast.

There's a youtube series where someone has seriously planned this out, but yes, because the radiation levels halve every x number of days, the longer you can stay uncontaminated, the better.

An icon with a schematic atom on it, superimposed on a city map, with rings indicating the effects of nuclear weapons. A red button labeled DETONATE is prominent.

NUKEMAP by Alex Wellerstein

NUKEMAP is a website for visualizing the effects of nuclear detonations.

https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

heldinadream · 28/01/2024 15:43

I'd just like to remind people that there are in fact survivors of Hiroshima who are still alive right now, in fact you can go to the Hiroshima Memorial Museum and hear them speak.
We're not really in charge of our fate. They have lived lives well and continue to bear witness.
So prep what you can and live while you're still here.

Crackoncrackerjack · 28/01/2024 15:45

Today’s bombs are 3000 times more powerful than Little Boy that was dropped on Hiroshima

BarelyLiterate · 28/01/2024 15:47

heldinadream · 28/01/2024 15:43

I'd just like to remind people that there are in fact survivors of Hiroshima who are still alive right now, in fact you can go to the Hiroshima Memorial Museum and hear them speak.
We're not really in charge of our fate. They have lived lives well and continue to bear witness.
So prep what you can and live while you're still here.

Hiroshima was one bomb, not the thousands which would hit the U.K. almost simultaneously in the event of a 21st century nuclear war.

And compared to the destructive power of today’s enormous thermonuclear weapons, the Hiroshima bomb was a firework.

There would be nothing worth surviving for.

Neriah · 28/01/2024 15:49

It's interesting how delusional people are about surviving A nuclear bomb. If it ever comes to it, it won't be A nuclear bomb - it will be Mutually Assured Destruction, and if you are unlucky enough to survive the bombs, and the radiation doesn't get you, the nuclear winter will. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were single blasts with relatively weak bombs, and only because nobody else had any to throw back.

MrsTerryPratchett · 28/01/2024 15:51

Neriah · 28/01/2024 15:49

It's interesting how delusional people are about surviving A nuclear bomb. If it ever comes to it, it won't be A nuclear bomb - it will be Mutually Assured Destruction, and if you are unlucky enough to survive the bombs, and the radiation doesn't get you, the nuclear winter will. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were single blasts with relatively weak bombs, and only because nobody else had any to throw back.

Exactly, very small bombs with no hope of retaliation.

Most of the UK would be glass after the bombs that would fall now. Some are 3000 times as powerful now. 3000.