Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

Should elective C sections for no reason be allowed?

169 replies

Dori92 · 20/11/2025 20:43

Just curious on people’s opinions on this.

Would like to point out I’m not opting for an elective section.

Thanks 💞

OP posts:
BudgetBuster · 20/11/2025 21:23

Sprogonthetyne · 20/11/2025 21:03

The cost question isn't really cut and dry. A section costs more upfront then a 'good' virginal birth, but a virginal bith requireing interventions can easily cost more, especially once you factor in the cost of treating possable complications down the line (eg. contanence issues or prolapse)

Oh absolutely agree 💯 hence why I said I wasn't aware if there truly was a cost difference.

APatternGrammar · 20/11/2025 21:24

Dori92 · 20/11/2025 21:21

Wow, some nasty people on here. Everyone’s entitled to an opinion, some replies are disgusting.

So does a section for no reason take priority over a section for someone whose baby is footling breech? Who can’t be turned using ECV?

This is a situation that is currently happening, so all the people that have commented nasty things, think again.

There is already a prioritisation. I wouldn’t have thought any change was needed there.

Celestialmoods · 20/11/2025 21:24

On the NHS, no.

Ponderingwindow · 20/11/2025 21:25

I absolutely hate the idea of women putting themselves through unnecessary surgery and putting their babies through the associated risks. Yes, I know there are also different risks from a vaginal birth.

however, I don’t want a blanket policy that says a woman can’t make a choice. Ultimately, if she can convince a doctor to do the surgery, that should be her prerogative.

I would rather live in a society where women have options than one where they do not.

RunMeOver · 20/11/2025 21:25

Not sure the question is clear - are you actually asking whether they should be allowed, or whether they should be paid for under the NHS? Is it a moral question about doing it at all, or an economic one about whether society should pay?

If the first, I can't for the life of me see why they wouldn't be allowed.

BudgetBuster · 20/11/2025 21:27

Dori92 · 20/11/2025 21:21

Wow, some nasty people on here. Everyone’s entitled to an opinion, some replies are disgusting.

So does a section for no reason take priority over a section for someone whose baby is footling breech? Who can’t be turned using ECV?

This is a situation that is currently happening, so all the people that have commented nasty things, think again.

You didn't bother to state your opinion. It looks like a post to wind people up tbf.

You keep saying no reason but there is always a reason... maternal choice is a reason. Nobody goes into a major abdominal surgery for the fun of it.

TomatoSandwiches · 20/11/2025 21:34

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 20/11/2025 21:23

I do not think that there is always a reason.
Maternal choice isn't a valid reason.
Nobody should be allowed to opt for major surgery.

Maternal choice is a valid reason, even the NICE guidelines support it.

titchy · 20/11/2025 21:35

Dori92 · 20/11/2025 21:21

Wow, some nasty people on here. Everyone’s entitled to an opinion, some replies are disgusting.

So does a section for no reason take priority over a section for someone whose baby is footling breech? Who can’t be turned using ECV?

This is a situation that is currently happening, so all the people that have commented nasty things, think again.

Priority on the day will be given to the highest medical need. Which may be a footling breech, a shoulder dystopia or something else. Once the emergencies are done then the non-emergency electives happen. Irrespective of why the woman has made that choice.

Do you want to expand on a non-emergency elective being given priority in theatre over a footling breech? Or is the breech not actually an emergency because the woman isn’t in labour?

AndSoFinally · 20/11/2025 21:35

Sprogonthetyne · 20/11/2025 21:03

The cost question isn't really cut and dry. A section costs more upfront then a 'good' virginal birth, but a virginal bith requireing interventions can easily cost more, especially once you factor in the cost of treating possable complications down the line (eg. contanence issues or prolapse)

Virginal births tend to work out free as the hospital gets to make money on all the publicity 😊

TomatoSandwiches · 20/11/2025 21:38

The NHS is in a poor state but I find it really very hard to believe that a planned, elective section whilst the mother is not in labour would be put before an emergency section for footling breech of a labouring mother.

You need to fully explain your question and the scenario you mentioned.

BernardButlersBra · 20/11/2025 21:38

What are your medical / healthcare credentials then? NICE guidelines deem maternal choice a reason. Plus the prioritization will have been done on clinical need and judgement.

TheIceBear · 20/11/2025 21:39

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 20/11/2025 21:23

I do not think that there is always a reason.
Maternal choice isn't a valid reason.
Nobody should be allowed to opt for major surgery.

But there always is a reason. And yes it’s major surgery but a vaginal birth is no walk in the park either and has just as many risks if not more.

Thedogscollar · 20/11/2025 21:40

Dori92 · 20/11/2025 21:21

Wow, some nasty people on here. Everyone’s entitled to an opinion, some replies are disgusting.

So does a section for no reason take priority over a section for someone whose baby is footling breech? Who can’t be turned using ECV?

This is a situation that is currently happening, so all the people that have commented nasty things, think again.

This would very much depend if the woman with the breech presentation is in active labour.
Obviously the medics decide on clinical priority.
Your original post did not contain this situation though.

CallMeEvelyn · 20/11/2025 21:41

Arsey thread of the week award goes to!

MossAndLeaves · 20/11/2025 21:44

I think they should be privately paid for if elective

RosesAndHellebores · 20/11/2025 21:45

Tammygirl12 · 20/11/2025 21:21

I feel like for a medical reason or second birth following traumatic first birth.

ill bite - I don’t think it should be easily allowed for first babies without medical need. I think these women should be offered therapy instead.

(yes I’ve had a section and no I don’t think it’s good for you or baby as a first choice)

I disagree, I think mothers should be offered an experienced, competent and kind midwife in a maternity unit that isn't understaffed. Every. Single. Time.

If a midwife isn't experienced, then an experienced modwife must be available to step in.

Until the above is guaranteed, I don't want my dd or dil to have to take their chances.

Bumbers · 20/11/2025 21:46

Of course!

Flinderskleepers · 20/11/2025 21:47

It doesn't matter if the NHS is on it's knees, women entitled to healthcare on the NHS should be able to have the birth they want including an elective section. There are lots of things that you could penalise patients for by charging them for treatment. Why does it have to be women?

And OP, your thread is goady. Get off your phone and go to bed.

CallMeEvelyn · 20/11/2025 21:48

MossAndLeaves · 20/11/2025 21:44

I think they should be privately paid for if elective

And I think you should pay out of your own pocket too for physio after a botched emergency C-section, after all it's your choice to improve your pelvic floor 👌

Sprogonthetyne · 20/11/2025 21:48

AndSoFinally · 20/11/2025 21:35

Virginal births tend to work out free as the hospital gets to make money on all the publicity 😊

Accommodation for all the shepherd's takes up so much of the profit, they bearly break even. Plus those wise men are surprisingly poor tippers

Greybeardy · 20/11/2025 21:48

what's your interest in this OP? there's a few reasons why an maternal request elective section might go ahead of an elective section for a footling on an elective list. If the footling is an emergency (labouring/SROM'd) then there aren't many things that'd trump that as a cat 1/2 section in whichever obstetric theatre is free. Unless you're the consultant doing the decision making re. list ordering you've probably not quite got all the right info.

3luckystars · 20/11/2025 21:48

I wouldn’t get an ECV if my life depended on it.

I am allowed choose to have a c section if I want to, and rightly so.

What anyone else does is none of my business and none of your business either.

Pavementworrier · 20/11/2025 21:48

The impact of perinatal hypoxia is only just starting to be understood

I would pick a c section to avoid this and I think everyone should be entitled to make the same choice

Ladamesansmerci · 20/11/2025 21:49

I chose to have a C-section. I have OCD and simply couldn't cope with the unknowns of vaginal birth. I spent my entire pregnancy quite mentally unwell and crippled with anxiety about still birth, shoulder dystocia, birth injuries, oxygen deprivation for my baby, etc.

Knowing I had the option for a C-section, despite there being no physical medical reason to need one, helped me cope. Forcing me to go through a birth I would have been petrified of would have been traumatic. I needed the known and controlled environment that comes with a section.

Women should absolutely be allowed to choose an elective section. It would be a slippery slope imo to start opposing women's birth choices, or making some people pay privately. Most midwives and consultants will encourage a vaginal birth in the absence of medical reasons. They encouraged me, but I made a fully informed choice and do not regret it one bit. Most women want a vaginal birth anyway. The amount of women choose a section for 'no reason' will be very few.

Also, the risks of sections are spoken about frequency. Most women are aware of them. The riska of vaginal birth imo are not spoken about. It's not often you'd hear professionals talking about the risk of things like cord compression, permanent incontinence, severe tears, the risk of forceps, etc. All information should be available on both options, and women should be able to pick.

TurquoiseDress · 20/11/2025 21:49

There is always a reason- including women who choose to have a c section, that one comes under ‘maternal request’ and is ‘allowed’

Swipe left for the next trending thread