Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

Declining antenatal care

1000 replies

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 14:37

I've declined midwife appts,I had a call last week to try and change my mind and another today,I feel coerced and bullied,patronised and ignored,I'm 20 weeks today and just want to be left alone, considering not going to my 20 week scan now too, the 13 week one wasn't a pleasant experience either and I feel very anti NHS,tho I don't have funds for complete private care, just feeling very emotional atm

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Thread gallery
8
curliegirlie · 14/11/2024 20:52

I've had one allbeit brief scan and no issues were raised then, screening came back low risk so I can asume all is as well as can be expected

Low chance is exactly that: low chance. When I was pregnant with my DD my chance was 1 in 1,900. We were that one - and she has that extra chromosome. It was really important that we were in hospital so she could have the checks on her heart, I could have support with feeding her etc. You can never assume. Particularly if you'll have had minimal antenatal care up to that point.

Katy123g · 14/11/2024 20:52

It makes me so frustrated that someone would turn down antenatal check ups.

I was sent into hospital from my 25 week midwife appointment due to my blood pressure.

I was admitted and my son was born by c section a week later due to severe pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome.

I didn't have symptoms.

I owe my and my 9 years olds life to that midwife.

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:53

HuckleberryBlackcurrant · 14/11/2024 19:41

Please go to the anatomy scan. This isn't about you.

It's my body so it kinda does involve me, this is part of the problem as soon as youre pregnancy you're no longer seen as a person,just a lump of meat/incubator and medical appointments aren't about me even though it's happening directly to me

OP posts:
DoreenonTill8 · 14/11/2024 20:53

Really think it's so bloody sad how detached and soulless some posters are with regards to their unborn child.
'I'm not an incubator'
'I'm not a vessel'
Honestly if the only person you can think about and prioritise while you are pregnant is YOU, why the fuck are you getting pregnant?

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:54

GivingitToGod · 14/11/2024 20:02

No one is coercing you. You are being contacted by the healthcare system to ensure the best possible outcomes for u and your baby. Re having no body autonomy; tests and investigations inevitably involve your baby being examined.
I hope you are getting some support

The 2 midwives were strongly coercing me, they didn't listen to me or accept my responses

OP posts:
JolieFilleCommentCaVa · 14/11/2024 20:55

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 15:30

Pardon? What's this comment based on?

Probably your whole attitude!

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:55

Playingintheshadow · 14/11/2024 19:58

I never had any intention of it, nor did I even reference SS in any of my posts, because I have no idea whether or not they would get involved in a situation like this. Enjoy your dinner.

Sorry wasn't directed at you but previous people have said that my other children obviously are being neglected which isn't the case at all

OP posts:
remaininghopeful23 · 14/11/2024 20:55

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:42

I have at no point said I won't be attending the 20 week scan, I'm tempted to go private instead but haven't fully decided. With my first you had a 12 week scan then a 20 week scan and then no further scans unless something was spotted,it's only been fairly recently they've introduced a routine growth scan later on, before youd have your scan at 20 weeks then that would be it till baby was born, at my first scan I did not have a low lying placenta and no issues with cervix,for everyone saying it's so important to have urine and BP tests,if it's so important why is it OK for it to be left uncheckedfor 10 weeks at a time especially if u don't get symptoms of GD or pre eclampsia

Because it's much less likely to happen at an earlier gestation. Your checkups happen more regularly later on because GD and PET are much more likely to happen at later gestations. PET is by definition after 20 weeks.

DoreenonTill8 · 14/11/2024 20:55

@Casuallydresseddeepinconversation if at every appt, you were reassured that YOU were THE MOST special, the most important, that the baby counted for nothing, because you were the most important person.... would you go to them?

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 14/11/2024 20:56

Please monitor your BP and blood glucose, if you aren’t going to go to your midwife appointments, @Casuallydresseddeepinconversation.

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:57

CarrotPencil · 14/11/2024 20:15

IMO if you want the best and healthiest start for your baby then you’ll get the antenatal care. Think of it as for your baby rather than yourself.

But I am also a person here and I also matter

OP posts:
Barleysugar86 · 14/11/2024 20:57

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 15:20

To see if anyone else has not had midwife appointments and how they navigated it,there's lots of women on this forum so thought it would represent a balanced proportion of pregnant women

For what it's worth my friend did something very similar to what you are suggesting as she was living in rural Asia and quite remote. She was young and felt healthy and the bump and everything suggested she was great so she just went with the flow. She had a stillbirth at 38 weeks, the baby looked perfectly formed, it absolutely crushed her. I'm not sure if they worked out why it happened and I didn't want to pry, but I always thought if she'd come home and been under medical care she probably wouldn't have lost it. I wouldn't take the risk personally so I find your attitude a bit baffling.

Nursemumma92 · 14/11/2024 20:58

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:42

I have at no point said I won't be attending the 20 week scan, I'm tempted to go private instead but haven't fully decided. With my first you had a 12 week scan then a 20 week scan and then no further scans unless something was spotted,it's only been fairly recently they've introduced a routine growth scan later on, before youd have your scan at 20 weeks then that would be it till baby was born, at my first scan I did not have a low lying placenta and no issues with cervix,for everyone saying it's so important to have urine and BP tests,if it's so important why is it OK for it to be left uncheckedfor 10 weeks at a time especially if u don't get symptoms of GD or pre eclampsia

It's 8 weeks as your 20 week scan is counted as a contact.
That gap is allowed as GD is only tested for from 28 weeks unless there are concerns before that, and the chances of pre eclampsia occurring are very rare before the 3rd trimester. People who have history of this or are high risk for this early occurence are monitored more closely. You surely understand that bar this long gap you seem fixated on, the appointments are 4 weeks apart in the third trimester, until 36 weeks when they become fortnightly/weekly depending on your situation. Your placental function cannot be predicted at this point and you can't possibly anticipate that from how you are feeling.
It doesn't seem like anything that anyone is saying is going in.

DowntonNabby · 14/11/2024 20:59

medical appointments aren't about me even though it's happening directly to me

You're carrying a baby that cannot advocate for itself – of course the appointments aren't about you alone!

C152 · 14/11/2024 20:59

I don't think your feelings are unreasonable. But as someone else said, anyone who goes against what is considered the norm, is generally going to get a rough ride from others.

This isn't really the same as your situation but, after an appallingly bad first appointment with the NHS midwife (on top of unprofessional behaviour from the GP), I paid for a private midwife. For me, she was worth it, as I needed someone who would advocate on my behalf, should it be required.

I chose not to have the blood tests and, although bullied by both the (NHS) midwife and GP, nothing else came of it.

bakewellbride · 14/11/2024 20:59

But the baby's health matters MORE. I think that's what you're not grasping. And as a mother the well being of the baby should be top priority. It's childish to have a 'what about me?' approach, the health of the baby should be the top priority.

DoreenonTill8 · 14/11/2024 20:59

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:57

But I am also a person here and I also matter

Why on earth do you think you don't matter.
The whole point of maternity care is you are pregnant with another human, it would be bonkers to focus solely on either one of you.

Brinkley22 · 14/11/2024 20:59

Barleysugar86 · 14/11/2024 20:57

For what it's worth my friend did something very similar to what you are suggesting as she was living in rural Asia and quite remote. She was young and felt healthy and the bump and everything suggested she was great so she just went with the flow. She had a stillbirth at 38 weeks, the baby looked perfectly formed, it absolutely crushed her. I'm not sure if they worked out why it happened and I didn't want to pry, but I always thought if she'd come home and been under medical care she probably wouldn't have lost it. I wouldn't take the risk personally so I find your attitude a bit baffling.

I’m so sorry. This is such a tragic story

EdithBond · 14/11/2024 21:00

Notellinganyone · 14/11/2024 20:29

I do understand- I chose to have all three of mine at home to minimise frustrating interactions with HCPs who contradicted each other and medical evidence. However the checks are there for a reason- educate yourself so you can make informed decisions and be clear about your rights but take a balanced view. I strongly disagree with the OP who says you need to be compliant- that’s nonsense but better to be informed and make your own decisions from there.

100%. Being informed is absolutely vital. Do your research and your reading. Speak to people willing to talk candidly and give balanced advice.

As with all things in life, information is power and a woman who’s well informed, feels empowered, supported and relaxed, and has proper continuity of care (one woman, one midwife) has a much greater chance of a positive birth.

As with all things in life, it’s about assessing and managing risk.

It’s important to understand why certain practices are due to management of scarce resources, minimisation of litigation and even business interests (e.g. insurers).

This is an excellent film, which I think is available on some streaming services: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0995061/

The Business of Being Born (2008) ⭐ 7.3 | Documentary

1h 27m | 15

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0995061

CarrotPencil · 14/11/2024 21:00

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:57

But I am also a person here and I also matter

I didn’t say you weren’t and don’t…. You can get care for your baby and also be a person and matter…. The fact is, your body as a pregnant mother, affects your baby in-utero.

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 21:01

Mercury2702 · 14/11/2024 20:28

I’m a nurse and not going to go down the line of other posts because every patient has the right to make informed choices and decline care.

However I can say with certainty that it will likely be referred to safeguarding. There’s a huge difference between declining induction, sweeps etc and not attending scans and appointments completely. As others have pointed out, there’s things that can happen that don’t always present with symptoms, the Doppler can check for irregularities which may signify your baby has interrupted blood flow etc. Missing appointments or no attendance is a red flag in safeguarding to ensure you’re not being coerced not to attend by an abusive partner and children missing health appointments by their caregiver is a red flag for neglect. That’s not to say you are neglectful to your children but it does raise questions to why you’re not engaging with checks for the health of your child, are you hiding anything, are other live children missing healthcare.

I think you just need to be realistic that these checks are for the well-being of both you and your baby. If something were to happen to you and you suddenly died whilst pregnant or in birth from something that could be picked up, do your other children have a caregiver to look after them? Maternal death does happen. And are you ok with a social services referral in which children’s care may want to attend your home regularly for visits?

This is no nastiness at all as your body, your choice even if it’s not a choice most people would make, but you just need to consider that it isn’t just about the care of yourself

But its OK to be coerced by medical professionals? No my existing children get all the health care they have required, my toddler had a fever Monday and was seen by a GP Tuesday, had to call 111 and travel to a medical centre 40 minutes away as my GP surgery wouldn't see her as all appts gone by 8.30 but I had her checked by a gp nonetheless

OP posts:
BusyCaz · 14/11/2024 21:02

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:57

But I am also a person here and I also matter

Angry Yeah you do, but I would put my baby first!

Halfemptyhalfling · 14/11/2024 21:02

I would use NHS for scans and childbirth and save my money for doing things with the children or healthy food or a cleaner

Scottishskifun · 14/11/2024 21:03

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 20:42

I have at no point said I won't be attending the 20 week scan, I'm tempted to go private instead but haven't fully decided. With my first you had a 12 week scan then a 20 week scan and then no further scans unless something was spotted,it's only been fairly recently they've introduced a routine growth scan later on, before youd have your scan at 20 weeks then that would be it till baby was born, at my first scan I did not have a low lying placenta and no issues with cervix,for everyone saying it's so important to have urine and BP tests,if it's so important why is it OK for it to be left uncheckedfor 10 weeks at a time especially if u don't get symptoms of GD or pre eclampsia

The 10 week gap is dependent on your health board mine the biggest gap was 6 weeks.
That's by the by gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia are much more likely to occur past the 24/28 week point. Placenta failings again more likely towards the end of pregnancy. After 28 weeks you have a visit usually every 4-6 weeks with urine tests. I had appointments 28, 32, 36 weeks and 38 weeks. Was due one at 40 weeks but gave birth at 39 weeks.
So are you not going to have basic checks because a urine test and a BP check are really so intrusive on you?!

DowntonNabby · 14/11/2024 21:05

Casuallydresseddeepinconversation · 14/11/2024 21:01

But its OK to be coerced by medical professionals? No my existing children get all the health care they have required, my toddler had a fever Monday and was seen by a GP Tuesday, had to call 111 and travel to a medical centre 40 minutes away as my GP surgery wouldn't see her as all appts gone by 8.30 but I had her checked by a gp nonetheless

You sound like a diligent mother to your two older children. So why not be as diligent with the child you are carrying?

I asked further up: what exactly has happened to make you so mistrustful of NHS care?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.