I'm currently trying to decide between an elective c-section or not on my second, and have been asking lots of friends who have had both.
I had an induced first delivery which ended up due to her heart rate suddenly dropping with ventouse to get her out quickly, and me having a 3rd degree tear. On paper, exactly what I wanted to avoid. However, I had an epidural and absolutely no pain. I had physio follow up to ensure no ongoing issues. I felt like if I had to stay another night in the labour ward, I would have lost my mind, and if I had had a c-section it would have been another three. With my first delivery, I'm happy I chose vaginal rather than c-section even given how things worked out, though if I'd have been given a crystal ball in advance I would have chosen a c-section. Make of that what you will.
With my second, I'm trying to weigh up increased risk of side effects from the tear/getting a tear that bad again.
My pro-section list is: - entirely controlled
- reduced risk of tears/incontinence issues (though tbh not as much difference as you'd expect, it seems most of the 'damage' comes from the pregnancy)
- clarity for my toddler and childcare arrangements about when I'll be gone and how long for (hopefully)
- calm experience
My con list is:
- increased risk of allergies/digestive issues. This is a big thing for us as my first had a dairy allergy which made the first few months hellish, and the only 'factors' you can influence are vaginal delivery (reduces the risk, generally helps gut) and breastfeeding (reduces the risk). I did both, so worried if I go for a c-section second time round it will increase chance of same allergy.
- Reduced mobility with new baby and first few weeks and longer in hospital. With my first delivery I was instantly fine, the niggling hip pain I'd had through third trimester disappeared. Friends who had sections have spoken about not being able to pick up their baby or get nurses to help them, and not being able to drive/move for a few weeks. Its a short time period, but I found those first few weeks lasted an age so not looking forward to it. Even with my assisted delivery that required stitches (I was in surgery for about an hour!) that was the only 'extra' time and I was back to normal much quicker, though I did have follow up appointments.
- Risk of lack of sensation/scar/muscle damage. A few people have said they have a patch on their stomachs with no sensation. That would bug me, but isn't a huge thing
I really struggle with deciding tbh. I would say even though I know a number of people who've had the textbook 'not what you want' vaginal birth, most have been happy enough after. Equally, I only know one friend who says she regrets her elective c-section: she thinks it has somehow not benefited her daughter as much but I'll be honest and say I don't fully understand her logic on that one.
I don't think the 'major surgery' thing is so much a risk: for me its more the longer stay and all the other stuff. I'm still leaning towards a section largely because if I get a similar or worse tear this time I'll feel like an idiot. But, by far, the people I know with the 'best' births and recoveries are ones who were fit and active before and during pregnancy and had vaginal deliveries. So if you've no pre-existing conditions and are in decent shape and on your first pregnancy, I think thats the 'obvious' choice both for your body recovering, benefits to baby and future pregnancies.