However, as much as I like rare steak, pate, runny eggs, wine etc, I do feel that for the sake of my baby's wellbeing its not going to kill me to go without them for 9 months. I can still indulge in them all after baby is born and I know that by avoiding them I have reduced the risk of any impact on my baby.
The problem is that so many of the guidelines don't 'reduce the risk of any impact'.
Not eating runny eggs, which come from salmonella vaccinated chickens, doesn't reduce your risk of salmonella in any meaningful way at all. It's just a pointless deprivation.
Pate- well some pate is riskier. But when my husband made stilton pate and refridgerated it just long enough to set it, it didn't magically become dangerous compared to its constituent parts. So not eating that pate wouldn't have done anything meaningful to reduce risk.
If the guidance was more specific, or more up to date, then yes it might.