I'm just reading through the notes on interventions in my material from my class. Of course it isn't exhaustive (would I look for exhaustive descriptions of how to use breathing and relaxation in NHS medical material? Probably not) but I can see sections on breech, sweeps, inductions, forceps,ventouse, and Caesereans including elective Caesereans and suggestions for which of the audio tracks to use for women who have been pre booked onto elective Caesereans. It also says women who are getting c sections or who think they might can ask the instructor for additional support with regards to adapting the content of the course to understand the c section process and cope etc.
My instructor just described last class a hypnobirth with an epidural at the end and the ways in which the lady coped (well!).
Leads me to think the instructor makes a difference. But I have also forwarded the page on elective sections and naughtily a copy of the relevant MP3 (also maggie Howells mp3 on c sections and hospitals) to a friend back home, so it's not like there's absolutely nothing.
There is little, yes, I comparison to say nhs antenatal classes, so we are doing both. Both sets of info are there. I won't expect the nhs sessions to go in depth into breathing, massage and relaxation, although they will mention it I am sure. The hypnobirthing course is mentioning interventions quite a bit, but obviously not as much as elsewhere.
I am just trying to walk into my first birth with a patchwork quilt of info from different sources. I know I've got the drugs standing by, and I know I have my Hypno prep, DH and doula also standing by - and the baby will come out one way or the other. I know my entire family on the other side of the world are waiting in terror knowing something bizarre is about to happen to their poor daughter in the absence of a gynaecologists waiting to cut her belly. I do hope I survive the birth because if not they will be convinced it was because I didn't have a Caeserean I.e.. The only safe way to birth.
I don't think we can ever conclusively conclude if women with whom hypnobirthing worked would have had straightforward births of the same nature anyway - many would disagree, and perhaps for right reason. I know if it works for me, I will credit hypnobirthing, because I have gone from terrified tokophobia (coming from a c section is normal culture) to a person who is open to a vaginal birth and whose muscles really don't ache so much. A terrified clenched mum trying to prevent baby coming out as she has been raised to believe vaginal delivery is weird? Or a calm mummy trying to attempt a vaginal birth expecting 100 times worse than the period spasm that had her vomiting in A and E in January, but still, not as terrified as she was and actually open to the idea that it's perhaps possible to have a vaginal birth? Which state is better? I'd say the latter. It has already helped. I am already sleeping well. I am already opening up (forgive the pun) to the idea that a baby will come out of me possibly without a knife. Which in itself is breathtakingly surprising for me. Would it have happened anyway? Nope. Likewise, I don't think, for the hundreds who have benefitted from hypnobirthing one can say it would have happened anyway, and the prep is just a coincidence.
But this doesn't obviously extend to say another woman's baby was breech because she didn't chant mantras loud enough to turn it. Or that someone else had fourth degree tears because she didn't imagine how ripe like a flower her cervix was. That's insanity and if there are these messages being sent out to mothers, that's horrific.
I've only got weeks left, and I'll stick to it because I am sleeping so well, and my muscles don't ache. For a lifelong insomniac and a habitual worrier with achey muscles topping the list, it's worked :)