Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

The fourth child

54 replies

Phaedria · 16/09/2005 11:28

I have 3 children, all boys 6,3 and 7 months. Cant help wanting a fourth - tho I dont mind if it s boy or girl.....anyone any advice on 4 ??

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
sparlover · 16/09/2005 11:28

only have one myself but i used to work for a family with 6!

tbh after 3 i didn't think it made that much difference. you soon get used to it!

coldtea · 16/09/2005 11:37

A friend of mine has 5 with roughly a year between them. She says once you have 2/3 children & are used to juggling another child doesn't make any difference.

They are the nicest children too they really entertain & look out for one another.

Lonelymum · 16/09/2005 11:37

I have 4. what do you want to know?

lou33 · 16/09/2005 12:00

I have 4, i would advise against it, but i am in the minority on here about that.

joec · 16/09/2005 12:01

hi i also have 4 kids...
not much difference to having 3 if i'm honest

joec · 16/09/2005 12:01

mind you does depend on the age gaps you have

lou33 · 16/09/2005 12:02

I disagree there is a huge difference

joec · 16/09/2005 12:10

like i said think it depends on the age gaps.
the age gap between my youngest 2 is 2o months and found that a bit demanding but otherwise ok.
finding it gets easier now they are gettign older

Phaedria · 16/09/2005 12:10

is is MUCh more work ? does it help with the 'middle child' syndrome ? what about cars ? ours all fit on the back seat of a mediumm sized car... 4th caesarian ?????? and Im 40 ! OK I must be completely mad .... but

OP posts:
tabitha · 16/09/2005 12:11

I found having 3 a dawdle but 4 was much harder
although I think a lot of this was due to the age gaps.
Don't regret it though

tabitha · 16/09/2005 12:14

I've got a Multipla, looks like a big box on wheels but we all fit in it
and I was 41 when the youngest was born.
I think I found it so much harder because my eldest two were teenagers when the youngest was born so I was experiencing 'teenage type traumas' with them at the same time as the normal hard work that a new baby/toddler brings.

Phaedria · 16/09/2005 12:14

Lou 33 - why would you advise against it ?

OP posts:
joec · 16/09/2005 12:16

i agree with tabitha , it does depend on the age gaps,
my 4 are now 10, 7, 3 and 15months.
dd2 is due to start nursery in a few weeks and i know it will be nice to just spend some time alone with ds2.
hard but wouldnt be without any of them

Miaou · 16/09/2005 12:19

I'm thinking about a fourth too - but ds is only six weeks so a way off yet! Anyone with a big gap between the first two and the second two? How did you cope?

lou33 · 16/09/2005 12:21

It's too hard for me. Mine are 13, 8, 6 , 4. I get no privacy, peace, space, etc. House is constantly being wrecked, tons of laundry, bigger car, larger food/clothing bills etc. I have teenage and toddler tantrums going on at the same time, blah blah blah.

Someone better than me may take it all in their stride, i wasn't really cut out for motherhood, especially 4.

joec · 16/09/2005 12:21

my dd1who is 10 is a great help with youngest.
dont ask or expect her to do alot but nice that she can hold ds2 and keep him amused if i am needed somewhere else

joec · 16/09/2005 12:24

yes, i can agree with the washing, car, and food bill.
i am one of four so prob feels a bit more normal to me .
used to all the noise and stuff.
must admit would like more privacy. but found that even with one child you dont get much time on your own anyway

Janh · 16/09/2005 12:35

phaedria, I had a 4th CS at nearly 42 - older kids were 11, 8 and nearly 5. Having 4 is interesting, and fun before adolescence kicks in...mine are now 23, 20, 17 and 12 and I know exactly what lou means

Lonelymum · 16/09/2005 12:45

I would say 4 does minimise the middle child syndrome. My eldest 2 are very close although they are all friends with each other, but now when 1 and 2 go off together, 3 still has 4. In fact, any pairing works to some extent. Maybe Lou you found it hard because your children are a little more spaced apart than mine. There is only less than 7 years between my eldest and youngest so I am not getting teenage and toddler tantrums together. By the time I get to the dreaded teenage years, the youngest will be a happy little schoolboy (hopefully!).

Yes you do need a larger car, but once bought you never look back. Ours is a 7 seater so there is always plenty of luggage space though not necessarily in the boot!

As for your age, well the risks in pg are higher, but I was 38 when I had my youngest and it doesn't seem old to me.

lou33 · 16/09/2005 12:48

Hoorah for jan!

Mine have gaps of 4y8m, 23m and 27m, so not a huge gap between the last 3 really. I should have stuck to 1 or 2, silly me.

MaloryTowers · 16/09/2005 12:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

lou33 · 16/09/2005 12:51

She was wise

MaloryTowers · 16/09/2005 12:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

robinia · 16/09/2005 13:01

I love having 4 and looking forward to 5th arriving next month. Ages 9,8,6 and 4. I do have a cleaner/ironing lady so my drudgery quotient is reduced somewhat. Wouldn't want to go back to having two - so much less fun. (Although do remind me I said that at 7.30pm when trying to get ds3 ready for bed).

lou33 · 16/09/2005 13:08

Cleaner and ironing lady would help, yes.