Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Income tax- Burnam

223 replies

Niftywigglesheep899 · 20/07/2026 17:58

Does anyone know if Andy Burnam is planning to raise income tax , so we have less money coming in each month?

Im quite concerned - stretched as it is and can’t cope with anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
BoredZelda · 23/07/2026 18:56

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 18:40

No, he used a tax avoidance scheme by putting the property in the ownership of a company. Do you know the difference between 'evasion' and 'avoidance'?

Edited

I absolutely do. I also know it’s a handy word for those who want to be blind to the real issues of taxation, or want to smear the reputation of others.

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 19:22

BoredZelda · 23/07/2026 18:54

Are you saying you believe tax is altruistic and nobody should work within the rules to reduce their tax bill? None of us should be using salary sacrifice to bolster our pensions, planning for reducing inheritance tax, submitting tax returns to reduce our bill? The “scheme” was not illegal. It was specifically set up to allow people to do this. Their economy tanked because nobody looked at unintended consequences of letting some people do this so they changed the rules. How is any of the Lineker’s fault? (Or the dozens of others who did it?) If you pay more in a country when their own rules allow you not to, more fool you. That doesn’t make you superior to those who don’t.

Choosing to be on BBC’s payroll isn’t as simple as that. They may not have wanted to employ him directly. It’s easier to end a fixed term contract than it is to fire someone because your programming needs have changed. In the entertainment business, contracts are the norm. Even if they did want to, the terms and conditions of employment may not have suited him. He wouldn’t be free to do other work, set his own schedules, choose his projects etc.

It seems in your desperation to rubbish this letter, which has nothing but benefit for the vast majority of the country, you are ignoring logistics of real life by picking on one of those who signed it. Which leads me to ask, why are you against millionaires paying more tax, when a whole bunch of them are telling is they really want to?

I'm saying there's no point virtue signalling by claiming you want to pay more tax when you've used tax avoidance schemes in the past. That's laughable. It's rather like Keir Starmer attempting to position himself as a man of integrity then admitting he'd accepted tens of thousands of pounds worth of free goods from Lord Alli.
Where have I said I'm against a wealth tax or millionaires paying more tax?

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 19:25

BIossomtoes · 23/07/2026 18:44

If he'd wanted to pay more tax, he could have requested he was paid via PAYE by the BBC.

The BBC wouldn’t have agreed. I worked as a contractor for years. None of my clients would have entertained putting contractors on the payroll, the flexibility of not having permanent staff is the entire point of using contract staff. The BBC employs all its talent the same way.

He could either have been paid through his own company - as he was - or via an umbrella company - which is crass stupidity because you have to pay them a fee and both parts of NI contributions, both employee and employer. Nobody with more than half a brain cell does that.

So presumably you've finally accepted he used a tax avoidance scheme since you've ignored my comments on my earlier post. Paying your fair share of tax when disposing of an asset really isn't that difficult.

BIossomtoes · 23/07/2026 19:40

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 19:25

So presumably you've finally accepted he used a tax avoidance scheme since you've ignored my comments on my earlier post. Paying your fair share of tax when disposing of an asset really isn't that difficult.

No he used the only payment vehicle available to him. And you haven’t read the Guardian link properly either. I can’t keep up with your numerous fact free posts.

Papyrophile · 23/07/2026 19:47

BermudaRhombus · 23/07/2026 09:05

High earners are easily replaced. The roles they occupy don’t disappear when the individual leaves.

The roles don't change. The work is just done in another tax jurisdiction. But the main serious issue is that tax is not going to be paid in the UK.

Niftywigglesheep899 · 23/07/2026 19:48

BoredZelda · 23/07/2026 17:38

I mean, he’s been asked about it quite a few times and has his responses have been well reported. Unless you think he or John Healy are on Mumsnet and can give inside information, I’m not sure what you expect to get from this post.

I’d happily see my income tax go up of it helps us get out of the current state of the economy.

BTW, welcome to MN 3wordsandnumbers.

What do you mean by this?

BTW, welcome to MN 3wordsandnumbers.

And why the arsey post? Someone who is keen on politics may be able to say yes or no he’s said this and when. Obviously we’ve all heard the rumours but someone may have been able to give a more educated answer. So that’s why I asked to answer your question.

OP posts:
Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 19:56

BIossomtoes · 23/07/2026 19:40

No he used the only payment vehicle available to him. And you haven’t read the Guardian link properly either. I can’t keep up with your numerous fact free posts.

It's called a tax avoidance scheme. You can dress it up as a 'vehicle' or whatever ridiculous language you choose but the facts are the same. Have you actually read the documents or do you solely rely on articles from the Guardian and peddle them as 'fact'?

Papyrophile · 23/07/2026 19:59

@BermudaRhombus you may be comfortable with paying more, or a higher rate of income tax, but I think I already pay quite a lot of tax, and so far (I'm 70) I have not claimed any benefits beyond my state pension and the occasional visit to my GP. I have the SP, £300 per month from an occupational pension, and the proceeds of the SIPP we created 25 plus years ago. It should see us out so I am not arguing hard here, but had I not taken the initiative to start the SIPP, we would have been looking at a threadbare future.

BIossomtoes · 23/07/2026 20:14

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 19:56

It's called a tax avoidance scheme. You can dress it up as a 'vehicle' or whatever ridiculous language you choose but the facts are the same. Have you actually read the documents or do you solely rely on articles from the Guardian and peddle them as 'fact'?

Edited

It’s not a tax avoidance scheme. It’s a payment vehicle for contracted staff. Tens of thousands of contractors use it to deal with their self employed status.

ElizaMulvil · 23/07/2026 20:17

Yogafiend · 22/07/2026 11:36

This is interesting perspective- which is all good to know. But I do note that the specific examples you speak of difficulties from people who have qualifications from outside the UK. Is that the case? Because I must admit that my examples are people who are qualified either in the UK or the US and a couple from Canada. I think the language barrier can be a problem but not as before. I for example speak several languages for reasons to do with my childhood and so do my kids. We had a friend couple of ours that went to the Netherlands (not a word of Dutch) and they have been there for 5 years no worries. Their second child has now been born there and they have no intention to go back atm. One couple has moved to Virginia, US have been there 2 years. One of my best friends is now relocating to the US as well to Connecticut as her youngest is about to enter school.
One of my husbands friends that were originally living in the UK moved to Switzerland and again have been there 10 years no intention of going back. Interested to figure out why 9 out of 10 don’t work?
I’m surprised to hear @ElizaMulvil about New Zealand and Australia. Uncle in New Zealand works for BA and has been for years he’s clearly never coming back. And a friend in Australia in marketing who is the same - but this friend does not have kids.
On the other hand I do think you need a capacity of adaptability and going with the flow to make it work. From someone who has lived in several countries you can make it work even education wise - the only education I had in the UK was university and I ended up at a top university só your education doesn’t have to suffer. Maybe I have a different perspective because I have done this and have i tink I have a great anbility to adapt. And I do get it it’s not for everybody. You have to be open minded and willing for it to work. And I do miss the UK but thankfully that is sorted quickly as we are in the UK every 6 weeks 😁.

All my examples of UK qualified people

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 20:25

BIossomtoes · 23/07/2026 20:14

It’s not a tax avoidance scheme. It’s a payment vehicle for contracted staff. Tens of thousands of contractors use it to deal with their self employed status.

I was referring to Barbados.

BIossomtoes · 23/07/2026 21:50

Dragonscaledaisy · 23/07/2026 20:25

I was referring to Barbados.

It would have been helpful if you’d said so. It was perfectly clear I was referring to the case he won with HMRC.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 23/07/2026 22:05

littlemousebigcheese · 23/07/2026 18:22

I think the issue isn’t taxing millionaires, it’s taxing people on incomes that might seem high but don’t last long in today’s world. Most people want higher tax on a salary higher than theirs which is a problem. 50k think 100k is ripe for picking. 100k think 150k sounds reasonable to tax more, etc. I think we should tax companies like Amazon more, we should tax those earning millions and we should definitely stop paying benefits to those able to work.

I agree with this. People should pay tax, of course they should. But a wealth tax in most cases leads to less tax take, which will lead to middle income earners who cannot just up and leave, inevitably having to pay more. Tax corporations, close tax loopholes, replace the gazillion different property taxes with a land value tax. All of those things will get more money into the treasury. Wealth taxes are not the solution- not long term. How many people earn over £10million? About 0.01% of the population or something. It won't raise enough to even touch the sides of the NHS budget sheet and if it leads to people taking their business elsewhere it will lead to no tax being taken at all. They sound good to people who think they won't have to pay them.

Yogafiend · 23/07/2026 22:38

ElizaMulvil · 23/07/2026 20:17

All my examples of UK qualified people

What fields are they in? Just so different from my circle I’m just curious.

PinkFruitbat · 24/07/2026 09:06

The tax thresholds are ridiculous. As if £50k and £100k isn’t already enough of a mental barrier to HR, they are clobbering points for tax. Also, the benefit allowance drop offs are ridiculous and incentivise behaviour away from work. The tax and benefits thresholds need looking at together, and they should be made much fairer.

Income tax- Burnam
MustTryHarderAndHarder · 24/07/2026 09:07

Autumngirl5 · 20/07/2026 19:29

I don’t know but I hope he gets the welfare bill down. There are too many healthy young people receiving benefits when they should be working and it is crippling the UK.

He won't.

He's relying on people on benefits to vote for him so he isn't going to bite the hand that feeds him.

Burnhamsmascara · 24/07/2026 16:40

We have made the decision to leave the UK. We have dual citizenship so have options - and our DCs are now all off to University. The threat of land value tax and all the other wealth taxes are the straw that has broken the camels back.... I will be sad to go and I will miss my house (which I really thought would be my forever home) but the UK will just be too expensive to retire in when the time comes so better to make the move now.

PinkFruitbat · 24/07/2026 19:02

Burnhamsmascara · 24/07/2026 16:40

We have made the decision to leave the UK. We have dual citizenship so have options - and our DCs are now all off to University. The threat of land value tax and all the other wealth taxes are the straw that has broken the camels back.... I will be sad to go and I will miss my house (which I really thought would be my forever home) but the UK will just be too expensive to retire in when the time comes so better to make the move now.

Congratulations! Where will you be moving to?

Burnhamsmascara · 25/07/2026 11:37

@PinkFruitbat DHs company has agreed to move him to payroll in the US (where he currently has to spend around 50 percent of his time anyway) and we will split the remainder of our time between France and the Uk. We have accepted an offer on our main property in the Uk but will retain our small buy to let flat as a pied a terre. We have networks and friends in all these locations and DS1 is also relocating to the US for work so it’s all coming together. DH plans to work for five more years and then he will retire. My work can be done remotely so it’s all good. I travelled around a lot as a kid and have also done so extensively due to work so I am no phased by any of this.

LuckyHazelFox · 25/07/2026 11:53

Burnhamsmascara · 25/07/2026 11:37

@PinkFruitbat DHs company has agreed to move him to payroll in the US (where he currently has to spend around 50 percent of his time anyway) and we will split the remainder of our time between France and the Uk. We have accepted an offer on our main property in the Uk but will retain our small buy to let flat as a pied a terre. We have networks and friends in all these locations and DS1 is also relocating to the US for work so it’s all coming together. DH plans to work for five more years and then he will retire. My work can be done remotely so it’s all good. I travelled around a lot as a kid and have also done so extensively due to work so I am no phased by any of this.

Sounds like you've both worked hard to make a good life for your family. You're the perfect household for Labour to punish. Good luck in your new venture.

PinkFruitbat · 25/07/2026 13:02

Burnhamsmascara · 25/07/2026 11:37

@PinkFruitbat DHs company has agreed to move him to payroll in the US (where he currently has to spend around 50 percent of his time anyway) and we will split the remainder of our time between France and the Uk. We have accepted an offer on our main property in the Uk but will retain our small buy to let flat as a pied a terre. We have networks and friends in all these locations and DS1 is also relocating to the US for work so it’s all coming together. DH plans to work for five more years and then he will retire. My work can be done remotely so it’s all good. I travelled around a lot as a kid and have also done so extensively due to work so I am no phased by any of this.

Going on the US payroll is very wise. Sound like you are in a great position to make a better life than the tax crushing you would get in the UK!

TopPocketFind · 25/07/2026 13:11

The dual citizenship helps

Many people in the UK are crushed by Brexit, Austerity and Truss

But Labour......

Dilligafy · 27/07/2026 06:08

Burnhamsmascara · 25/07/2026 11:37

@PinkFruitbat DHs company has agreed to move him to payroll in the US (where he currently has to spend around 50 percent of his time anyway) and we will split the remainder of our time between France and the Uk. We have accepted an offer on our main property in the Uk but will retain our small buy to let flat as a pied a terre. We have networks and friends in all these locations and DS1 is also relocating to the US for work so it’s all coming together. DH plans to work for five more years and then he will retire. My work can be done remotely so it’s all good. I travelled around a lot as a kid and have also done so extensively due to work so I am no phased by any of this.

Perfectly understandable...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page