Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Has Tony Blair shifted far right?

396 replies

WildEnergySupplier · 27/05/2026 06:24

Tony Blair was always a warmonger with Iraq, but he seems to have gone full on far right / Reform now, criticising Starmer for not jumping in with Trump and the US on Iran.

He's saying we should have let them use our bases straight away and "show up" for America no matter what.

He also said Labour has made mistakes by spending more on welfare, focussing on Net Zero, increasing taxes on businesses..

Has he completely lost the plot? This sounds like proper far right policy to me.

I used to think Blair was centre-ground New Labour, but this feels like he's shifted hard right. In fact it's giving me proper far right / racist vibes.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
BIossomtoes · Today 09:50

Upstartled · Today 09:47

Where else have I said that I disagree with Blair's policy proposals or his assessment of the precarious status of things, as they stand? I haven't.

I don't like Starmer. Where is the hypocrisy here? Or is character assassination from the left so entrenched it is a universal tool used unsparingly for anyone who disagrees with you?

I didn’t mention you when I said:

I find it really interesting that posters who are vociferous in their criticism of the current government are suddenly eulogising about an intervention of a former Labour PM because it fits their narrative.

You’ve made it all about you.

DierdreDaphne · Today 09:51

1dayatatime · Today 09:45

Well from a left wing perspective the CEO of Apple or Microsoft being paid many multiples of what say an 18 year old in a fish and chip shop is simply "unfair".

If you challenge this on say value then you will normally get an emotive response back of say "who adds more value to society a paediatric nurse or a city banker". Or uninformed personal prejudice "that all the bosses of say Apple do is go on fancy lunches and try to screw over their underpaid workers ".

You have to understand that the left wing (both on politics and economics) is emotion based - being "nice and fair".

Whereas right wing politics is based more on logic and reality. It's the classic heart over head divide.

"You have to understand that I'm exploiting you for your own good" 😂

LittleBearPad · Today 09:53

BIossomtoes · Today 09:50

I didn’t mention you when I said:

I find it really interesting that posters who are vociferous in their criticism of the current government are suddenly eulogising about an intervention of a former Labour PM because it fits their narrative.

You’ve made it all about you.

You’re the one who wrote

Perfectly, thank you. I’m not blind either, I can read what you post elsewhere

So @Upstartled isnt being particularly unreasonable to assume you’re talking about her

BIossomtoes · Today 09:54

LittleBearPad · Today 09:53

You’re the one who wrote

Perfectly, thank you. I’m not blind either, I can read what you post elsewhere

So @Upstartled isnt being particularly unreasonable to assume you’re talking about her

She made that assumption before the post you quoted. Nice try though.

Upstartled · Today 09:59

But @Blossomtoes, your own observation is that people who who prefer conservative policies approve of many of Blair's proposals. That makes sense, doesn't it? These are common sense proposals that fall happily within a conservative outlook.

Why would you think that people would disagree with him just simply because he was once a a Labour pm?

Alexandra2001 · Today 10:00

1dayatatime · Today 09:45

Well from a left wing perspective the CEO of Apple or Microsoft being paid many multiples of what say an 18 year old in a fish and chip shop is simply "unfair".

If you challenge this on say value then you will normally get an emotive response back of say "who adds more value to society a paediatric nurse or a city banker". Or uninformed personal prejudice "that all the bosses of say Apple do is go on fancy lunches and try to screw over their underpaid workers ".

You have to understand that the left wing (both on politics and economics) is emotion based - being "nice and fair".

Whereas right wing politics is based more on logic and reality. It's the classic heart over head divide.

Yet the UK has been subjected to right wing policies and governments for the majority of the post war period.

Look where its got us.

A Bank (or Amazon) making many billions in profit paying back office staff very low wages, so low that they need benefits in order to have a living income is immoral.

...and yes Apple does use materials produced by people earning very little, even using child labour in its supply chains.

LittleBearPad · Today 10:01

BIossomtoes · Today 09:54

She made that assumption before the post you quoted. Nice try though.

You’re in a lovely mood this fine morning.

Alexandra2001 · Today 10:04

Upstartled · Today 09:59

But @Blossomtoes, your own observation is that people who who prefer conservative policies approve of many of Blair's proposals. That makes sense, doesn't it? These are common sense proposals that fall happily within a conservative outlook.

Why would you think that people would disagree with him just simply because he was once a a Labour pm?

Edited

Blair has made observations and suggestions that are in tune with Labour current policies.

Blair said Blair argued for the government to crack down on welfare spending, abandon restrictions on oil and gas, embrace the technology and artificial intelligence revolution and smooth relations with Donald Trump

Aside from oil, they are doing all of this, hence KC sent to USA.... NS drilling doesn't benefit UK consumers and there isn't much to drill now, it is only economical to do IF prices stay high, which given Trump needs a deal with Iran, wont happen.

BIossomtoes · Today 10:07

Upstartled · Today 09:59

But @Blossomtoes, your own observation is that people who who prefer conservative policies approve of many of Blair's proposals. That makes sense, doesn't it? These are common sense proposals that fall happily within a conservative outlook.

Why would you think that people would disagree with him just simply because he was once a a Labour pm?

Edited

It definitely indicates to me that he no longer has any pretension to being representative of Labour values - if of course he ever did. I guess the question is would you have voted for his government when he was leader of the Labour Party? Only you can answer that but if your answer is no then he’s either moved significantly right or you vote along party lines. Nothing wrong with the latter, by the way. Many people do.

TemperanceWest · Today 10:07

LittleBearPad · Today 10:01

You’re in a lovely mood this fine morning.

BIossomtoes is right. Go back and read the exchanges between her and Upstartled. Nothing to do with mood. No need to make it personal.

LittleBearPad · Today 10:08

Alexandra2001 · Today 10:04

Blair has made observations and suggestions that are in tune with Labour current policies.

Blair said Blair argued for the government to crack down on welfare spending, abandon restrictions on oil and gas, embrace the technology and artificial intelligence revolution and smooth relations with Donald Trump

Aside from oil, they are doing all of this, hence KC sent to USA.... NS drilling doesn't benefit UK consumers and there isn't much to drill now, it is only economical to do IF prices stay high, which given Trump needs a deal with Iran, wont happen.

They really aren’t cracking down on welfare. Starmer failed spectacularly to do anything even mildly on welfare - scrapping the two child limit was the complete opposite

Upstartled · Today 10:08

BIossomtoes · Today 10:07

It definitely indicates to me that he no longer has any pretension to being representative of Labour values - if of course he ever did. I guess the question is would you have voted for his government when he was leader of the Labour Party? Only you can answer that but if your answer is no then he’s either moved significantly right or you vote along party lines. Nothing wrong with the latter, by the way. Many people do.

Well, if you are keeping abreast of all my posts around MN, then you will know that I did use to vote Labour, back in the day.

Upstartled · Today 10:11

And of course they aren't cracking down on welfare. They intended to but have been so busy bribing the backbenchers with taxpayer money that that ship will never sail.

Upstartled · Today 10:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

1dayatatime · Today 11:22

DierdreDaphne · Today 09:51

"You have to understand that I'm exploiting you for your own good" 😂

Where exactly is the exploitation? The worker voluntarily contributes his or her labour in return for payment. If the payment is too low for the amount of labour required then the worker has the right to not take the job or resign. This is not exploitation.

Let's take the example of a pencil factory. The owner takes the risk and invests his money into a bunch of machines, graphite, wood, salaries etc. So it is only right that if he is successful then he gets a reward on his investment for taking that risk.

By contrast the worker just contributes his / her labour with the alternatives being either another job or no job at all. Again where is the exploitation.

Now if the business is unsuccessful then the owner loses all his investment and his job. Whereas the worker only loses their job.

Northermcharn · Today 11:30

TemperanceWest · Today 09:28

No you said:

They are supposedly great haters of bigotry but often speak of (for example) white people, or holders of balanced political views, or people who criticise benefits culture, or sex realists, or Jewish people, in the most bigoted manner imaginable.... as if these people were no better than fascists. As we see on this thread, very very clearly

Calling Blair far right is daft, but it is not criticising him in the "most bigoted manner imaginable."

Edited

Uhmmmm So you Don't think calling people of a view that might be slightly to the 'right' of your own, fascist, is significantly bigoted. Ok. I see where we are. I see you and I can't help you any further.

Upstartled · Today 11:33

A deletion for saying that it's puritanical and silly to say that Tony Blair is far right. And also totally in keeping with today's left? How odd.

BIossomtoes · Today 11:34

Northermcharn · Today 11:30

Uhmmmm So you Don't think calling people of a view that might be slightly to the 'right' of your own, fascist, is significantly bigoted. Ok. I see where we are. I see you and I can't help you any further.

Wasn’t the original quote yours? I don’t think anyone else has called anyone fascists unless I’ve missed it.

Northermcharn · Today 11:40

1dayatatime · Today 11:22

Where exactly is the exploitation? The worker voluntarily contributes his or her labour in return for payment. If the payment is too low for the amount of labour required then the worker has the right to not take the job or resign. This is not exploitation.

Let's take the example of a pencil factory. The owner takes the risk and invests his money into a bunch of machines, graphite, wood, salaries etc. So it is only right that if he is successful then he gets a reward on his investment for taking that risk.

By contrast the worker just contributes his / her labour with the alternatives being either another job or no job at all. Again where is the exploitation.

Now if the business is unsuccessful then the owner loses all his investment and his job. Whereas the worker only loses their job.

And let's not forget the pencil guy has started the factory - which provides the jobs which provides the income. I cannot get over how economically illiterate some people are. And some of these people are currently in gvt. God help us.

TemperanceWest · Today 11:43

Upstartled · Today 11:33

A deletion for saying that it's puritanical and silly to say that Tony Blair is far right. And also totally in keeping with today's left? How odd.

That isn't what you said, though. If you had, it wouldn't have been deleted. You wrote a personal attack, not a general observation.

Marmalademorning · Today 11:47

mellongoose · 27/05/2026 06:37

Blimey. Prioritising economic growth is now ‘far right’. Whatever next?!

I know - rediculous isn’t it 😂

Jedentag · Today 11:48

BIossomtoes · Today 09:30

I find it really interesting that posters who are vociferous in their criticism of the current government are suddenly eulogising about an intervention of a former Labour PM because it fits their narrative.

No. They have listened. Something I find very lacking in those who lean left.

TemperanceWest · Today 11:50

Northermcharn · Today 11:30

Uhmmmm So you Don't think calling people of a view that might be slightly to the 'right' of your own, fascist, is significantly bigoted. Ok. I see where we are. I see you and I can't help you any further.

You can't help me any further because you are unable to provide examples of what you claimed was being said on this thread.

Upstartled · Today 11:55

TemperanceWest · Today 11:43

That isn't what you said, though. If you had, it wouldn't have been deleted. You wrote a personal attack, not a general observation.

If a personal is everybody who agrees Tony Blair is far right, then you'd be right.

TemperanceWest · Today 12:00

Upstartled · Today 11:55

If a personal is everybody who agrees Tony Blair is far right, then you'd be right.

I am not sure anyone other than the OP has suggested TB is far right, and your post didn't appear to be aimed at her?