Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Has Tony Blair shifted far right?

397 replies

WildEnergySupplier · 27/05/2026 06:24

Tony Blair was always a warmonger with Iraq, but he seems to have gone full on far right / Reform now, criticising Starmer for not jumping in with Trump and the US on Iran.

He's saying we should have let them use our bases straight away and "show up" for America no matter what.

He also said Labour has made mistakes by spending more on welfare, focussing on Net Zero, increasing taxes on businesses..

Has he completely lost the plot? This sounds like proper far right policy to me.

I used to think Blair was centre-ground New Labour, but this feels like he's shifted hard right. In fact it's giving me proper far right / racist vibes.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
nearlylovemyusername · Yesterday 09:02

Sandysandybeaches · Yesterday 07:48

I disagreed with some of what he said but the rest was very clear and astute.

  • policy should come before politics- we are distracted by personalities and their characters when we should be focusing on what policies these people propose. Agree.
  • economic growth is key, we can’t afford anything else without it. Agree.
  • current policies are not coherent and harm business. There is no clear strategy for growth. Agree.
  • net-zero is harming us and makes little difference. It is not a well thought out policy. We are deliberately reducing our quality of life when other countries that actually contribute large amounts of gh gasses are roaring ahead. China will not change its policy because of what ed millibsnd says (they don’t care what uk does). Agree.
  • the burden of welfare payments is unsustainable and must be reformed. Agree.
  • we couldn’t win a war against Russia without the US so need to keep good relations with them in the long term. Agree.

Personally I think that raising the quality of life of the lowest deciles i s more important than reducing inequality. I’d rather have more billionaires and fewer people in deprivation than no billionaires and still people in deprivation. Try to pull everyone up rather than squash some down.

Excellent post, completely agree.

I’d rather have more billionaires and fewer people in deprivation than no billionaires and still people in deprivation. Try to pull everyone up rather than squash some down.

The issue is that there is nobody, not a single person in Labour who sees it this way. They all, Andy, Wes, let alone Angela, Rachel, they all shout about inequality and their way to resolve it is redistribution. If they listened to Tony and actually did something, we'd have a chance to keep Reform out.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 09:05

nearlylovemyusername · Yesterday 09:02

Excellent post, completely agree.

I’d rather have more billionaires and fewer people in deprivation than no billionaires and still people in deprivation. Try to pull everyone up rather than squash some down.

The issue is that there is nobody, not a single person in Labour who sees it this way. They all, Andy, Wes, let alone Angela, Rachel, they all shout about inequality and their way to resolve it is redistribution. If they listened to Tony and actually did something, we'd have a chance to keep Reform out.

Yes - Labour - dragging people down, Never lifting them up.

The poorer and more helpless people feel, the more votes Labour get.

That is their reason for being - these days. Disgusting.

Imdunfer · Yesterday 09:13

nearlylovemyusername · Yesterday 09:02

Excellent post, completely agree.

I’d rather have more billionaires and fewer people in deprivation than no billionaires and still people in deprivation. Try to pull everyone up rather than squash some down.

The issue is that there is nobody, not a single person in Labour who sees it this way. They all, Andy, Wes, let alone Angela, Rachel, they all shout about inequality and their way to resolve it is redistribution. If they listened to Tony and actually did something, we'd have a chance to keep Reform out.

I think Thatcher hit the nail on the head with that one. She said something like "they'd rather the pie was smaller and everybody had an equal slice than that the pie was bigger and everyone had a bigger slice, but some people had a bigger slice than others."

nearlylovemyusername · Yesterday 09:13

Northermcharn · Yesterday 09:05

Yes - Labour - dragging people down, Never lifting them up.

The poorer and more helpless people feel, the more votes Labour get.

That is their reason for being - these days. Disgusting.

If you think about it - it used to be the case, poorer people vote Labour, wealthier vote Tory.
So Andy, who accused Tony Blair being stuck 40 years ago, is the one who is actually stuck.
Because these days poorer people vote Reform, not Labour. Youngest voters used to vote Labour, but they have Green now. So if Labour were a bit more clever, they'd realise that they need to consolidate liberal middle classes and there is a huge politically homeless centrist vote base, exactly what TB said.
Just reconfirms that there is no real intellectual power in current Labour party. Again, TB was right calling it "intellectual wasteland".
I feel sorry about losing Kier - at least he was good with his international standing. I can't be so sure about the others.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 14:21

nearlylovemyusername · Yesterday 09:13

If you think about it - it used to be the case, poorer people vote Labour, wealthier vote Tory.
So Andy, who accused Tony Blair being stuck 40 years ago, is the one who is actually stuck.
Because these days poorer people vote Reform, not Labour. Youngest voters used to vote Labour, but they have Green now. So if Labour were a bit more clever, they'd realise that they need to consolidate liberal middle classes and there is a huge politically homeless centrist vote base, exactly what TB said.
Just reconfirms that there is no real intellectual power in current Labour party. Again, TB was right calling it "intellectual wasteland".
I feel sorry about losing Kier - at least he was good with his international standing. I can't be so sure about the others.

Yes of course, it has always been the 'working class' party. But it was in a different way originally. the Working class then were proud, would never have skived or aimed to live on handouts, or planned families they couldn't afford to raise without state handouts. Worklessness and benefits were not encouraged at all. and for eg. Unions were meant for workers who had no rights in the workplace. It was all for good reasons. But now, all that has gone. Unions are a joke and labour encourage benefit culture for life. People don't have hope anymore - no jobs just benefits. Then once on benefits, stay on benefits.

LittleBearPad · Yesterday 14:41

WildEnergySupplier · 27/05/2026 06:24

Tony Blair was always a warmonger with Iraq, but he seems to have gone full on far right / Reform now, criticising Starmer for not jumping in with Trump and the US on Iran.

He's saying we should have let them use our bases straight away and "show up" for America no matter what.

He also said Labour has made mistakes by spending more on welfare, focussing on Net Zero, increasing taxes on businesses..

Has he completely lost the plot? This sounds like proper far right policy to me.

I used to think Blair was centre-ground New Labour, but this feels like he's shifted hard right. In fact it's giving me proper far right / racist vibes.

Someone’s lost the plot yes. It’s not Tony Blair

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 14:42

Northermcharn · Yesterday 14:21

Yes of course, it has always been the 'working class' party. But it was in a different way originally. the Working class then were proud, would never have skived or aimed to live on handouts, or planned families they couldn't afford to raise without state handouts. Worklessness and benefits were not encouraged at all. and for eg. Unions were meant for workers who had no rights in the workplace. It was all for good reasons. But now, all that has gone. Unions are a joke and labour encourage benefit culture for life. People don't have hope anymore - no jobs just benefits. Then once on benefits, stay on benefits.

That’s a highly romanticised view of the past. My dad who was a miner’s son and would have been 110 this year would have split his sides reading that.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 14:48

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 14:42

That’s a highly romanticised view of the past. My dad who was a miner’s son and would have been 110 this year would have split his sides reading that.

Oh really? Fascinating. My grandad was a miner. My grandma was a nurse (an immigrant as well). They were very proud people and labour through and through. They wouldn't support the shit show we see today.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 14:49

LittleBearPad · Yesterday 14:41

Someone’s lost the plot yes. It’s not Tony Blair

Full on far right. These people are fcking deluded. Frightening. Still it explains a lot...

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 14:53

Northermcharn · Yesterday 14:48

Oh really? Fascinating. My grandad was a miner. My grandma was a nurse (an immigrant as well). They were very proud people and labour through and through. They wouldn't support the shit show we see today.

Is it really necessary to be so snarky? You made a generalised post about a whole sector of society. All I did was point out that someone who was part of that throughout their formative years - he remembered the General Strike really clearly - wouldn’t recognise your description.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 15:03

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 14:53

Is it really necessary to be so snarky? You made a generalised post about a whole sector of society. All I did was point out that someone who was part of that throughout their formative years - he remembered the General Strike really clearly - wouldn’t recognise your description.

You said 'That’s a highly romanticised view of the past. My dad who was a miner’s son and would have been 110 this year would have split his sides reading that.'. That was unnecessary, and rude, from you, and it was also of course untrue (the romanticised bit, the 'split his sides bit' if you say so). So I replied accordingly.

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 15:05

What was rude about it? It is romanticised and my dad would have laughed. I didn’t jeer at you.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 15:07

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 15:05

What was rude about it? It is romanticised and my dad would have laughed. I didn’t jeer at you.

Sorry Blossom I'm bored with you now.

Alexandra2001 · Yesterday 15:10

Imdunfer · Yesterday 08:03

all mouth no trousers

What was it you were saying earlier about how I insulted you on other threads? 🤣🤣🤣

Like i said, higher productivity, will almost certainly lead to higher unemployment, as we are we seeing, less workers but producing the same as before.....

Correct, less jobs are needed to do the same work. Incorrect unemployment rises in a direct relationship, because although it reduces jobs on the short term in specific areas it tends to increase employment over time through its effects.

Increasing total output requires a market to sell into and that in a competitive world and out of our nearest and richest one, is v difficult.

It is not "very difficult" to export into the EU, it's still by far our biggest export market.

Huh? its a saying NOT an insult....

Come up with how you'd improve productivity, as you kep saying we need to do this... or is it a case of "back seat driver"

Exporting to EU costs more, jobs lost, uk firms setting up EU subsidiaries to get round the red tape, prior to Brexit, export to Lisbon was as easy as sending goods to Luton, now its expensive, lengthy and has reduced in volume.

Its the very opposite of improving productivity.

Shoola · Yesterday 15:55

Pansykavalier · 27/05/2026 07:59

Personally I prefer to prioritise quality of life. For everyone - not just for the ones who are able to ‘contribute’…

Where does the money come from for everyone's quality of life if the economy is doing badly?

roxyro · Yesterday 16:03

WildEnergySupplier · 27/05/2026 06:53

Disagreeing with anti racism is usually a far right sign.

You’re quite obviously brainwashed. A young student bled to death in handcuffs after being stabbed by a Sikh who told the police he’d said some hurty racist words - he hadn’t. He’d been murdered by the Sikh who knew that any shout of racism gets them off the hook.
I hope you’re going to take to the streets over this as you probably did over George Floyd.

Grow up!

Greenknightsuccess · Yesterday 17:27

I don’t agree with Blair about Iran, but the rest of what he says sounds like good sense to me.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 17:29

Greenknightsuccess · Yesterday 17:27

I don’t agree with Blair about Iran, but the rest of what he says sounds like good sense to me.

Even the bits where he's akin to the Ku Klux Klan?

soddingspiderseason · Yesterday 17:34

Greenknightsuccess · Yesterday 17:27

I don’t agree with Blair about Iran, but the rest of what he says sounds like good sense to me.

Absolutely. He talks common sense, which is always anathema to the far left.

1dayatatime · Yesterday 17:34

Northermcharn · Yesterday 17:29

Even the bits where he's akin to the Ku Klux Klan?

What about Blair's views on dressing up in uniforms and wanting to invade Poland?

Upstartled · Yesterday 17:37

I heard that he has sympathy for the far right adjacent media outlets, like the BBC.

Upstartled · Yesterday 17:38

Oh, and he just assumes Cherie is a woman even though she has short hair and is ruthlessly ambitious. Bigot.

SinicalMe · Yesterday 20:08

1dayatatime · 27/05/2026 16:51

Countries viewed as having successful immigration policies are:
Australia
New Zealand
Singapore
Switzerland

All of which have tightly controlled migration with selective entry systems with a strong emphasis on economic contributions.

Countries seen as unsuccessful on migration include:
Feance
UK
Italy
Greece
Spain
United States

The UAE too. I’m talking about Westerners. They have no recourse to public education or health etc you bring your non working spouse and you can’t claim benefits for them or your children.

I will not mention the Indian workers as that’s completely different and not something for the UK to emulate.

Winederlust · Yesterday 20:20

WildEnergySupplier · 27/05/2026 18:12

They're a pair of Reform supporters.

No, they're not.
You are really showing your ignorance with every post and are avoiding actually engaging with any of the clear, articulate and evidence based replies pointing out your errors.
Which isn't really surprising given your OP.

Whatifitallgoesright · Yesterday 22:36

I'm trying to work out what is driving so many people to bark 'far right!' all the time Like, what psychologically is going on with them? I already think that a lot of people on the left can't handle having their mindsets challenged - they can't cope with having to rethink things and deal with the discomfort that comes from realising you were wrong about some things. Acknowledging these uncomfortable truths means facing possible rejection from the group so they must double down and bark all the louder.