Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Why are Labour MPs so out of touch with what the public want?

100 replies

greypinkspoon · 12/05/2026 10:29

I voted Labour and haven’t been overly impressed with him. But I also can’t think of anything worse than changing leader right now and see how this uncertainty is affecting markets. Why can’t these Labour MPs see the harm they are creating? What is it they actually want? Because I don’t think these Labour MPs have a clue. They are just scared to lose their jobs!

OP posts:
PickAChew · 12/05/2026 17:57

BananaPeels · 12/05/2026 17:07

Even if they represent the majority? Do you not believe in democracy?

The people who voted Reform have, in some areas, got the Reform council, or at least councillors, that they voted for. It wasn't a general election. They voted (or didn't vote) in a GE less than 2 years ago and will get to vote in the next one in 3 years. Many will have changed their mind again between now and then.

We can't just keep changing governments with the weather, according to the fickleness of the media.

1dayatatime · 12/05/2026 17:58

Cheesipuff · 12/05/2026 17:41

What is needed is to slash spending and put the money into encouraging business and infrastructure. But slashing spending means benefits, pensions,public service employees taking a hit - that’ll go down well -but as things stand at the moment they will lose the next election anyway so it would be nice if they put the country first, not their jobs, and got on with doing that.

Edited

Excellent post - they're going to lose anyway so why not do what is electorally really unpopular but economically essential.

NeedSomeHeadspace · 12/05/2026 17:59

They don’t have a clue. I think noone feels shame anymore and tries to blame everyone else, as the whole party is absolutely bloody useless.

PickAChew · 12/05/2026 18:02

Cheesipuff · 12/05/2026 17:41

What is needed is to slash spending and put the money into encouraging business and infrastructure. But slashing spending means benefits, pensions,public service employees taking a hit - that’ll go down well -but as things stand at the moment they will lose the next election anyway so it would be nice if they put the country first, not their jobs, and got on with doing that.

Edited

Do you mean infrastructure like the privately owned water companies that can't adequately keep sewage away from what should be clean water? Those privately owned water companies which, when penalised for allowing shit to end up where it shouldn't be, charge customers more?

Cheesipuff · 12/05/2026 18:17

PickAChew · 12/05/2026 18:02

Do you mean infrastructure like the privately owned water companies that can't adequately keep sewage away from what should be clean water? Those privately owned water companies which, when penalised for allowing shit to end up where it shouldn't be, charge customers more?

No I means roads and rail etc
Do you mean the privately owned water companies that somehow Ofwat left to their own devices and the last several governments ignored?

Monty36 · 12/05/2026 18:21

They realise that whilst a protest vote, that the General Election will be here all too quickly. And they will likely be out of a job unless change of some sort occurs.

And the GE will be Reform’s to lose. Scarily.

BananaPeels · 12/05/2026 18:22

Crikeyalmighty · 12/05/2026 17:56

They don’t represent the majority - of people that voted only 27% voted Reform and if you add in the Tory’s that makes 47% - more voted for centre/centre left than didn’t

I’m don’t run with this. I look at who didn’t vote not who did. The polls showed that reform were going to have a stonking lead. It was all over the press. All the predictions showed that they would get a massive amount of seats. If someone really really hated them and wanted to not have Reform win then they would have got off their bum and voted against them. My view is if you don’t vote, you were effectively voting for the front runner because you didn’t feel strongly enough to vote against them. So my view is that they are even more popular then they seem or at the very least people are apathetic to whether or not they get in.

Greenknightsuccess · 12/05/2026 18:29

RedTagAlan · 12/05/2026 10:46

What do the public want that labour don't see ? That is, what are they out of touch with ?

If that had one simple answer, then it should be easy. But I don't think there is a single simple answer ?

They want stability, continuity and less drama.

PickAChew · 12/05/2026 18:31

Cheesipuff · 12/05/2026 18:17

No I means roads and rail etc
Do you mean the privately owned water companies that somehow Ofwat left to their own devices and the last several governments ignored?

Yes, I mean the very same. I don't disagree with you about roads and rail even though we probably disagree, if I understood that part of your post correctly, on exactly how it should be funded or exactly where the investment needs to be.

Greenknightsuccess · 12/05/2026 18:31

needastrongone · 12/05/2026 11:57

The Labour MP’s are seeing that, to the public, Keir Starmer is unelectable. Why they think that is probably complicated. After being out of office for the last 14 years I imagine they’d like to have more than a 5 year shot at it, and bring in someone more electable. Do you think that Keir Starmer is able to win the next General Election?

Changing PM is the last thing they should do if they want to be re-elected. It’s just advertising how out of control they are.

Crikeyalmighty · 12/05/2026 18:32

PickAChew · 12/05/2026 17:57

The people who voted Reform have, in some areas, got the Reform council, or at least councillors, that they voted for. It wasn't a general election. They voted (or didn't vote) in a GE less than 2 years ago and will get to vote in the next one in 3 years. Many will have changed their mind again between now and then.

We can't just keep changing governments with the weather, according to the fickleness of the media.

Edited

Agree -

Bringemout · 12/05/2026 18:32

RedTagAlan · 12/05/2026 12:35

That is a very specific complaint you have. I would argue that labour backbenchers should not really be expected to be tied up with serving a capitalist system. They are labour after all.

It’s not serving it, the bond yield os how expensive our debt is. It’s how creditworthy we are. Without creditworthiness we can’t borrow money to finance our rising public spending.

Bringemout · 12/05/2026 18:35

I think we need to really slash spending, I suspect by the end of Labours term in parliament we are going to be forced to.

Roaminginthegloaming · 12/05/2026 18:57

There are some really thought provoking articles about this at

www.spiked-online.com

(Writers include Brendan O’Neill and Julie Burchill)

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 12/05/2026 19:00

Where are all these nursing vacancies that a pp talks about? I've read a few threads on here lately saying that many NHS trusts have recruitment freezes and newly qualified HCPs including nurses, obviously doctors, physios, paramedics etc just can't get jobs.

Doris86 · 12/05/2026 19:04

RedTagAlan · 12/05/2026 10:46

What do the public want that labour don't see ? That is, what are they out of touch with ?

If that had one simple answer, then it should be easy. But I don't think there is a single simple answer ?

I think the answer is that the public want Labour gone, and Labour can very much see that. That’s why they are so desperate to get rid of Starmer and replace home with someone who they hope can things around before the next election.

ByGraptharsHammer · 12/05/2026 19:09

I think the signs that this cohort of Labour MPs were not really thinking in terms of a decade of power (in terms of a majority which suggests that) was the issue about disability benefit cuts. When that didn’t go through, and it should have done, suddenly you could see a huge problem on domestic policy early on. I don’t think Starmer and Reeves have ever really recovered from that.

Politics is a simple game where a party hangs together. If it doesn’t it will lose. These MPs don’t realise why they have actual jobs.

IfNot · 12/05/2026 19:43

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 12/05/2026 19:00

Where are all these nursing vacancies that a pp talks about? I've read a few threads on here lately saying that many NHS trusts have recruitment freezes and newly qualified HCPs including nurses, obviously doctors, physios, paramedics etc just can't get jobs.

I was looking recently for NHS apprenticeships for allied health care roles ( physios, sonographers etc).
None in my large city with a teaching hospital. If we are short of healthcare workers TRAIN THEM from the flipping army of unemployed people desperate for a chance.

IsabellaVireauxLaurent · 12/05/2026 22:29

because what the public want would ruin the country within the global community

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 13/05/2026 08:10

IsabellaVireauxLaurent · 12/05/2026 22:29

because what the public want would ruin the country within the global community

Quite frankly I’ll take a secure economy and low crime over the opinion of the global community.

Also, what is “global community” anyway?

There are alliances, but is there one global community?

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 13/05/2026 08:19

@ChardonnaysBeastlyCat The rest of the world matters if we are talking about the financial world. We are closely linked to what others think and how they act in the financial markets. It really does matter because our borrowing repayments go up and up if we don’t stay calm and pay attention to finance. Spending £110 billion a year on loans is atrocious and going up.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 13/05/2026 08:41

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 13/05/2026 08:19

@ChardonnaysBeastlyCat The rest of the world matters if we are talking about the financial world. We are closely linked to what others think and how they act in the financial markets. It really does matter because our borrowing repayments go up and up if we don’t stay calm and pay attention to finance. Spending £110 billion a year on loans is atrocious and going up.

But that’s not “global community”.

That’s financial markets. Business, not vague community.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 13/05/2026 13:46

@ChardonnaysBeastlyCat A global community is everything outside GB. If you are just talking about foreign policy, that’s very narrow and we are on the back foot with that as well. Brexit has hastened that and Trump. We should be far more focussed on business and finance. We are all poorer if they don’t and Trump won’t do what we want - obviously.

Cheesipuff · 15/05/2026 10:38

Greenknightsuccess · 12/05/2026 18:31

Changing PM is the last thing they should do if they want to be re-elected. It’s just advertising how out of control they are.

I don’t know. Andy Burnham seems a steady pair of hands who can get things done -we need someone who can get others on board and make decisions and I think he’s the only one who can do that.
look how many people Starmer has got rid of -starting with Sue Gray -I mean that is ridiculous in a leader -appoint people then get rid of them??!!

ukathleticscoach · 15/05/2026 14:17

The public don't know what they want.

They voted for a left wing party less than 2 years ago and have now more have voted for a far right party.

How that think they can get the economy going with Trump disrupting the world economy is beyond me. He said he would get a deal on Ukraine and totally failed. After he gave up on that he started a war with Iran> Despite Farage being all in on that war they cannot put 2 nd 2 together

My only guess is white van man with his tin port company has got used to paying virtually no tax for years and is complaining they have to up the workers pittance and pay more NI to fix the NHS the last right wing gov's wrecked

Pubs are shutting because of internet dating and shops because of online shopping. Remarkedly thousands of new takeaways have opened and they can afford the increase in min wage etc.TYpical reform voter is too buy complaining their knocked up kid can't get a council house to put down their vape and think it through

New posts on this thread. Refresh page