Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics
Thread gallery
6
LighthouseLED · 26/11/2025 13:40

Coletilla · 26/11/2025 13:37

I agree. Human factors. I’m someone’s who lost money during the technology crash. With hindsight, my attitude to risk was not sufficient, but I also blame myself, and would never take such risk again. Don’t have enough to “ride” ups and downs for umpteen years, no big portfolio that allows me to do that.

I do think if I was very young I might consider SS but I’d have my wits about me better.

And that’s fine. Nobody is forcing people to invest in stocks and shares. Just giving an additional tax incentive for people to do so.

It’s only relatively recently that the full ISA limit could be used for cash anyway.

Coletilla · 26/11/2025 13:40

AmberFawn · 26/11/2025 13:31

There are low risk investment options, even these generally outperform Cash ISAs even in the medium term.

What sort of period is medium term please?

PinkFrogss · 26/11/2025 13:40

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 13:34

Oh fuck she fully costed it again. So what increases will there be next year?

Stupid question…what does this mean?

That the savings/income generated is already earmarked to be spent elsewhere so not actually helping the deficit/debt?

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 13:40

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 13:40

Which may well end up paying care home fees i.e. back in the economy.

Not in the grubby hands of the government to spaff up the wall on god knows what.

God forbid they fund the NHS.

CinnamonSwirlLatte · 26/11/2025 13:41

When did she say this takes affect? The removal of the cap? April 2026?

LighthouseLED · 26/11/2025 13:41

NameChangePoP · 26/11/2025 13:38

Removal of the 2 child cap is ludicrous to me. I'm totally on-board with getting children out of poverty, but they should have removed the cap for children already born but kept it in place for any new ones.

We will now go back to how it used to be, a way of life. People having child after child so they don't need to work and get paid for doing so. Those children will repeat the cycle and it's never ending.

Didn’t they do that when the cap was originally introduced?

Kuretake · 26/11/2025 13:42

reversegear · 26/11/2025 13:32

Handing back the hybrid, closing my business that’s 5 staff gone I’m going back to uni to work for the NHS. This budget is shite, there goes all our money.

This isn't because of the budget though - you said in the summer you were going to be studying radiology at 50. More power to you, sounds like a great adventure and I've genuinely considered doing something similar myself.

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 13:42

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 13:39

More for them to buy.

But we keep being told they can't afford to buy them? They get brought up by investment funds.

AmberFawn · 26/11/2025 13:43

Coletilla · 26/11/2025 13:40

What sort of period is medium term please?

I think it’s what you need it to be, I don’t admit to be an expert. My long term is 10 years, but I have a mix of low, medium and higher risk funds because I want the best return I can in 10 years.
If you wanted to just go with low risk investments your long term would need to be longer than mine because the rate of growth is lower than higher risk.

SL2924 · 26/11/2025 13:43

I need to go through it with a fine tooth comb but it feels less bad than what I was expecting.

Some things I’m not particularly happy about esp the 2 child benefit cap removal but could have been a lot worse.

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 13:44

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 13:40

God forbid they fund the NHS.

Do you know how much is spent on the NHS?

LighthouseLED · 26/11/2025 13:44

SL2924 · 26/11/2025 13:43

I need to go through it with a fine tooth comb but it feels less bad than what I was expecting.

Some things I’m not particularly happy about esp the 2 child benefit cap removal but could have been a lot worse.

I agree with this. I’m sure there will be some details but overall doesn’t seem as bad as I thought it might be.

I may be an outlier, but I’m happier with tax thresholds being frozen than an immediate tax increase.

Cobol · 26/11/2025 13:45

As women have been disproportionately negatively affected by the 2 child benefit cap along with the children they are often left caring for while the father is free to have more children with a new partner, I would hope its abolishment would be welcomed on mumsnet. With have an aging population and falling fertility rates, the lowest ever. We don't need to discourage people from having children, let alone at the expense of children already born in circumstances they - the children - have no control over.

VanCleefArpels · 26/11/2025 13:45

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 13:38

Adding properties to the market is not taking away properties from young people. Much the opposite

The kind of young professionals that rent my flats are in no position to buy them - either due to inability to save for a deposit or their careers / personal lives are such that they don’t want to buy yet. Where are they supposed to live?

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 26/11/2025 13:45

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 13:39

More for them to buy.

Not really - unless they can live with parents for a while (which isn’t feasible for many with careers in large cities), the extortionate rent eats into any savings. Rental houses going on the market just makes renting more competitive, and forces renters out of the areas where they work or their children might be at school.

I don’t know why the government haven’t introduced a 0% mortgage for renters, with mortgage capacity based on length they been renting, monthly rental costs and their reliability for making rental payments. Most renters pay more in rent than they would on mortgage repayments.

Gallopingunicorns · 26/11/2025 13:45

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 12:50

It is a simple premise of life to me that people should only have children they can provide the resources to support. It is normally only the feckless who see popping out sprongs as a right rather than a responsibility.

Exactly this which is why a two child benefit is irrelevant. Those type of people do not make decisions in the same responsible way that you or I might. They will have them regardless so you only hurt the poorest children with a cap.

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 13:45

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 13:42

But we keep being told they can't afford to buy them? They get brought up by investment funds.

In which case they’ll still be in the rental market. There’s no down side.

Peopleareworried · 26/11/2025 13:47

TeenagersAngst · 26/11/2025 13:44

Do you know how much is spent on the NHS?

The NHS needs a complete overhaul - this is where they could save billions and improve the front line services.

VanCleefArpels · 26/11/2025 13:47

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 13:39

More for them to buy.

With what?? My tenants are exclusively young professionals. It’s well documented this demographic cannot buy in the current market without hefty help from the bank of M&D. In addition many don’t want to buy as they are not ready to settle in one location. It’s this demographic that will suffer the most.

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 13:47

PinkFrogss · 26/11/2025 13:40

Stupid question…what does this mean?

That the savings/income generated is already earmarked to be spent elsewhere so not actually helping the deficit/debt?

She said last year the plans were fully costed and there be no more tax increases. She as shown zero ability to cost anything. If anyone in the business budget that badly they would be out.

Peopleareworried · 26/11/2025 13:48

Cobol · 26/11/2025 13:45

As women have been disproportionately negatively affected by the 2 child benefit cap along with the children they are often left caring for while the father is free to have more children with a new partner, I would hope its abolishment would be welcomed on mumsnet. With have an aging population and falling fertility rates, the lowest ever. We don't need to discourage people from having children, let alone at the expense of children already born in circumstances they - the children - have no control over.

What they need to do is to go after absent parents, this is not necessarily going to increase the number of workers in the future by the amount that are 'paid' for.

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 13:48

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 13:45

In which case they’ll still be in the rental market. There’s no down side.

In some ways there is upside. Professional landlords are typically more compliant than lots of individuals.

VanCleefArpels · 26/11/2025 13:48

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 13:45

In which case they’ll still be in the rental market. There’s no down side.

very naive

VanCleefArpels · 26/11/2025 13:49

Dannydevitoiloveyourart · 26/11/2025 13:45

Not really - unless they can live with parents for a while (which isn’t feasible for many with careers in large cities), the extortionate rent eats into any savings. Rental houses going on the market just makes renting more competitive, and forces renters out of the areas where they work or their children might be at school.

I don’t know why the government haven’t introduced a 0% mortgage for renters, with mortgage capacity based on length they been renting, monthly rental costs and their reliability for making rental payments. Most renters pay more in rent than they would on mortgage repayments.

Totally agree that rental records should be taken into account by mortgage lenders - it’s madness that this counts for nothing.

godmum56 · 26/11/2025 13:50

watching here. No comment on her politics but Nus Ghani is kiccking arse