Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Luxury cars removed from the motability scheme

1000 replies

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:33

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

too little too late. As a full time worker I can’t afford to run a car, let alone a luxury car. Motability should be a standard car - available in automatic and manual, an option for wheelchair users, and that’s it.

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

The programme has been criticised for allowing people with non-visible disabilities to get luxury vehicles as part of their welfare. The chancellor wants to support the British car market with the new measures.

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Ahfiddlesticks · 25/11/2025 10:56

Sunita1234 · 25/11/2025 10:50

Of course the disabled people should be able to buy whatever car they want, But that's not the point here.
If someone is paid benefits and then uses that money to buy a luxury car, then obviously they shouldn't be getting benefits in the first place - because a benefit should be paid only to the people who really don't have the money to cope! Otherwise we end up as a country where we are now - bankrupt.

But a) the benefit isn't means tested

And

B) the benefit payment remains the same regardless of the car, it's the individuals on top payment that changes.

Kreepture · 25/11/2025 10:56

reasons why a 'luxury car' may be more appropriate than your bog standard vauxhall

Ride height - IE the distance between the floor and door/step in. ease of stepping in/out, or being able to sit and swivel yourself in.
Features - requirements for electrical/switch operated controls, heated seats, seat controls, driving column controls
WAV/or boot/backseat able to accommodate a wheelchair and family req, shopping...etc.
comfortable/sports style supportive seating that properly fits the driver.
easy to turn power steering.

and THAT's without any adaptations being made.

MidnightPatrol · 25/11/2025 10:56

Overthemhills · 25/11/2025 10:43

OP - can you explain precisely how Motability is “heavily subsidised “? Please

Because the government pays for it.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 10:56

Aweekoffwork · 25/11/2025 10:51

Even my disabled friend and his wife were shocked to be given a list of Audis, BMWs and Mercedes to choose from - they didn’t think it was fair when, if not disabled, they’d be driving a pretty ordinary car.

There is no list, not a single audi, bmw or merc is available without an advanced payment. My friends WAV had an advanced payment of just over £5,000.

Allthecoloursoftherainbow4 · 25/11/2025 10:57

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 25/11/2025 09:50

So if a person due to a physical disability receives pip but has a job with a high salary why shouldn't they have a luxury car that they pay the difference on?

Why would you claim government help if you dont actually need it?
The scheme includes a fairly hefty subsidy. If you are earning a high salary and can afford a car anyway, should you really be claiming more that you dont need?
The attitude in the UK these days seems so grabby, claim every penny you can even if you dont need it.

thestudio · 25/11/2025 10:57

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:44

But still subsidised!

OMG

It's subsidised by the SAME AMOUNT regardless of whether you get a vauxhuall or a mercedes.

They're not getting any more than any other claimant.

WiggyWiggyImGettingJiggy · 25/11/2025 10:58

Allthecoloursoftherainbow4 · 25/11/2025 10:57

Why would you claim government help if you dont actually need it?
The scheme includes a fairly hefty subsidy. If you are earning a high salary and can afford a car anyway, should you really be claiming more that you dont need?
The attitude in the UK these days seems so grabby, claim every penny you can even if you dont need it.

You often need to have disability payments to be able to access help for your disability.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:58

thestudio · 25/11/2025 10:57

OMG

It's subsidised by the SAME AMOUNT regardless of whether you get a vauxhuall or a mercedes.

They're not getting any more than any other claimant.

The point being they shouldn’t be subsidised to get luxury cars. A standard British model is fine.

OP posts:
Theyreeatingthedogs · 25/11/2025 10:59

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

Why?
Why should someone not be allowed to pay extra to upgrade the car?

Inthedeep · 25/11/2025 10:59

Aweekoffwork · 25/11/2025 10:51

Even my disabled friend and his wife were shocked to be given a list of Audis, BMWs and Mercedes to choose from - they didn’t think it was fair when, if not disabled, they’d be driving a pretty ordinary car.

Unless they could afford the hefty (many £1000s) down payment they still wouldn’t be driving an Audi, BMW etc. If they could afford the huge upfront down payment, they could afford to drive one of those cars anyway. Fact check before making ridiculous comments, because your friends have been very misleading to you.

Kreepture · 25/11/2025 11:00

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:58

The point being they shouldn’t be subsidised to get luxury cars. A standard British model is fine.

ok, what is a standard british model

please list them.

Zov · 25/11/2025 11:00

GreenSedan · 25/11/2025 09:34

Its amazing that they were ever included.

Yeah this. I'm not going to bash ANYone on benefits, or who has a Motability car, but it does seem odd that anyone would buy (or be allowed to buy) a luxury car, like a Mercedes Benz on Motability. I can't fathom how having a car like this would help anyone who has mobility issues.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 11:00

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:58

The point being they shouldn’t be subsidised to get luxury cars. A standard British model is fine.

Can you find a standard British model to take my friends large and heavy powerchair, his wife, and his two children in their car seats. Ta.

Sunita1234 · 25/11/2025 11:01

YaWeeFurryBastard · 25/11/2025 10:04

Many people are entirely missing the point which is that some (many?) people believe that benefits are a safety net to help the least well off in society and that if someone can afford say £500 a month on a car then they don’t need the subsidy in the first place and it would be better directed towards those in greater need. Some people are determined to see this as an attack on disabled people though.

100% agree with this.
The whole benefit system needs reform. Only the people who really need the money to survive should be getting benefits. UK is not a super-rich country anymore and cannot take this much longer.

SockFluffInTheBath · 25/11/2025 11:01

BackToLurk · 25/11/2025 10:53

These aren’t means tested benefits. As has been pointed out before

Maybe it should be. If lots of people stop taking the little bit that they’re currently entitled to, then it leaves more for the people with higher need. If someone can afford the huge up front payment for a luxury car why do they need to take from the motability scheme at all- bit like wealthy pensioners claiming winter fuel allowance just because they can.

ohtowinthelottery · 25/11/2025 11:01

FollowingAzureSeas · 25/11/2025 10:42

And it is difficult to get those adjustments done privately. My parents in law have found this, they actually wanted to keep the car they already owned.
I guess there should be a separate benefit to adapt a private car.

But regardless this is an unpleasant thread and I suspect full of untruths.I'm still shaking my head at the £500 leasing fee for a Yaris, I can only suspect that is actually finance not leasing, in which case the car will be owned at the end of the term, unlike a mobility car.

Not to mention @pinkstripeycat claiming they know people with anxiety who get a 'free' car.
Plus all those disabled children daring to get a car to learn to drive in. And they can have that at 16 too!

ElsaPeretti · 25/11/2025 11:01

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:47

I’m comparing what anyone else would have to pay for a non-luxury car. It’s a heavily subsided scheme and it shouldn’t provide a better standard of life than most people in the UK can afford.

You are aware that disabled people are also taxpayers, right? They’re not taking ‘your’ taxes. God forbid that someone who is living on a meagre fucking pittance should budget carefully enough to upgrade their means of independence.

Zov · 25/11/2025 11:01

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 11:00

Can you find a standard British model to take my friends large and heavy powerchair, his wife, and his two children in their car seats. Ta.

Would he buy a Mercedes Benz though?

Would that suit his needs/his family's needs?

.

Ahfiddlesticks · 25/11/2025 11:01

Allthecoloursoftherainbow4 · 25/11/2025 10:57

Why would you claim government help if you dont actually need it?
The scheme includes a fairly hefty subsidy. If you are earning a high salary and can afford a car anyway, should you really be claiming more that you dont need?
The attitude in the UK these days seems so grabby, claim every penny you can even if you dont need it.

Because without the motability scheme you can't get a modified vehicle. So if you need any adaptations, you need to go through motability. You can only go through motability if you are entitled to the higher level mobility pip payment.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 11:02

Zov · 25/11/2025 11:00

Yeah this. I'm not going to bash ANYone on benefits, or who has a Motability car, but it does seem odd that anyone would buy (or be allowed to buy) a luxury car, like a Mercedes Benz on Motability. I can't fathom how having a car like this would help anyone who has mobility issues.

Why are you pretending people on PIP or DLA are buying the vehicle? So my mates mercedes WAV doesn’t help him?

Sinuhe · 25/11/2025 11:02

The advance payment on a luxury car might be high but thereafter it's the same payment as a non luxury car.
Luxury cars usually have higher road tax and insurance costs. This is covered in the subsidised motabilty package rather than paid individually...
I think if one can afford a luxury car and the advance payment, they can also afford the premium tax & insurance payments.

phantomofthepopera · 25/11/2025 11:02

Aweekoffwork · 25/11/2025 10:51

Even my disabled friend and his wife were shocked to be given a list of Audis, BMWs and Mercedes to choose from - they didn’t think it was fair when, if not disabled, they’d be driving a pretty ordinary car.

Well they obviously wouldn’t have been able to afford an Audi, BMW or Mercedes on Motability either. Just because they were shown the options doesn’t mean they’re given away for free. I see plenty of things advertised that I can’t afford. It doesn’t mean others can’t afford them.

This really is simple. A severely disabled person gets £77 a week to help them get around. They can use it how they want. They can spend it on taxis, or give it to someone else to do their running round for them. They could get a very basic car on motability, or if that car won’t meet their needs they can put their £77 towards a better car and pay the difference themselves. It’s still £77 regardless.

I am grateful that we live in a country where we recognise that being disabled is a physical and financial disadvantage, and no matter how wealthy we wouldn’t want to swap lives with a disabled person. I understand the debate over whether people should or shouldn’t be given PIP for anxiety etc, but that’s a whole separate argument. Do I think a paraplegic person should have their £77 removed because they’re not poor? No, I think that would be wrong.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 11:03

Zov · 25/11/2025 11:01

Would he buy a Mercedes Benz though?

Would that suit his needs/his family's needs?

.

Edited

I wouldn’t, I don’t like them, if I was leasing a car via motability I would be leasing a vehicle, you aren’t able to buy them.

WiggyWiggyImGettingJiggy · 25/11/2025 11:03

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:58

The point being they shouldn’t be subsidised to get luxury cars. A standard British model is fine.

Your attitude is so telling about who you are as a person.

You're happy to spend X money on something basic that potentially doesn't suit someone's needs, but you're not happy for the same X amount of money to be topped up by someone because you see it as luxury.

You're jealous of those with disabilities.

Pretty fucked up really.

LeastOfMyWorries · 25/11/2025 11:03

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:58

The point being they shouldn’t be subsidised to get luxury cars. A standard British model is fine.

Why? I don't understand. If you are awarded £200 towards a holiday, for whatever reason, who's business is it whether you use that towards a youth hostel in the Brecons or cruising the Caribbean? do we only think its appropriate to interfere when its disabled people living their lives how they see fit?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.