Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Rachel Reeves can’t win, can she?

679 replies

anothervoter · 14/11/2025 10:24

After days and days of negative press and chatter about income tax going up, complaints on Mumsnet and across the media, today’s reports are that idea might be dropped and now she’s being accused of rattling the markets and making the cost of borrowing increase.

Honestly, genuine question- what can she do?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
cityanalyst678 · 14/11/2025 17:32

She needs a lot of help, because she comes across as clueless. She should listen to top business people and economists, take advice and then stick to the decisions. They keep chopping and changing, that is why the markets took a tumble. They simply don’t trust her judgement.
Let’s be honest, if you elect turkeys, you can’t expect Eagles. And the markets know it.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 14/11/2025 17:32

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 17:06

I don't think you can deliver too much inside 16months, especially when there is very little money.
Starmer did make it clear it would take 2 terms to turn the UK around.

I think their mistakes were from the outset, expenses and not reversing the NI cut.
The press jumped on this and its been down hill all the way, i've been listening to BBC and SKY saying Reeves u-turns on tax increases.. uh?

When did she announce these tax increases? Reeves never said she'd increases taxes, didn't even mention income tax vat or NI.... its unfair & very damaging to the country.
However, i ve no clue what her speech was about, its puzzled everyone i work with but she didn't mention taxes.

Given the Tariffs and the UK getting a better deal than others, its just as well he went to Washington, he has also got a better trading relationship with the EU.
NATO is also pretty important too.

Do you expect any PM to be sat in no10 during times of trouble? Johnson did well getting supporting for Ukraine, he didn't do that sat in London.

Seriously? The media, the markets, the analysts, Labour MPs, everyone, all said “she’s indicating there will be income tax increases”. But you’re in the dark, are you?

He would want two terms, wouldn’t he. But he’s making the economy worse, not better. He won’t last to the end of one term, thank god.

As for his international initiatives, what a farce. He’s achieved sweet FA. Coalition of the willing…

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 17:34

danglethedingle · 14/11/2025 17:21

The fact they keep trying to take tough action, then backing down when people complain, makes me even less confident that the government knows what its doing.

This end of a 4-5 year parliament is not the time to make friends, now is the time to take unpopular decisions that need to be made. A year before the the election is the time to give out the treats and appeasements.

If tax needs to go up, put the case firmly, succinctly and truthfully, and then carry it through. They've got the majority to get it done, just do it.

This shilly shallying just makes them look weak and incompetent. And that's what the markets hate more than anything.

Yes i agree with this, i really don't know why she had that press conference, it raised expectations that she would take the tough decisions.

However, that got Labour nothing but criticism & now they are getting even more criticism.

So a lose lose!

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 17:39

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 14/11/2025 17:32

Seriously? The media, the markets, the analysts, Labour MPs, everyone, all said “she’s indicating there will be income tax increases”. But you’re in the dark, are you?

He would want two terms, wouldn’t he. But he’s making the economy worse, not better. He won’t last to the end of one term, thank god.

As for his international initiatives, what a farce. He’s achieved sweet FA. Coalition of the willing…

You clearly hate Labour and whatever she did, you'd criticise, you even have your own thread 1000s of posts long where you express your hatred and anger.

You cannot even acknowledge the US tariff deal or the dropping of restrictions to the EU.

Yes buying weapons from the US to give to Ukraine, is imho quite important.

Its all rather unhealthy.

Labour wasn't my choice but we are where we are and have no chance to change until 2029.

chickenfucker · 14/11/2025 17:57

Make the tough decisions and stick to them. Isn't that what they kept saying they'd do before the election? I've been behind them on everything they've announced to tackle this but they've backtracked on it all, running scared of the press and their own backbenchers. Unfortunately they've fucked it so badly now I don't think they can pull it back.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 14/11/2025 17:58

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 17:39

You clearly hate Labour and whatever she did, you'd criticise, you even have your own thread 1000s of posts long where you express your hatred and anger.

You cannot even acknowledge the US tariff deal or the dropping of restrictions to the EU.

Yes buying weapons from the US to give to Ukraine, is imho quite important.

Its all rather unhealthy.

Labour wasn't my choice but we are where we are and have no chance to change until 2029.

No. I was in favour of WFA cuts (even though Darren Jones in opposition lambasted the Tories for even considering it 🙄). I was in favour of Kendall’s downward pressure on welfare. Both were sunk by Labour MPs.

I’m in favour of prison reform.

I thought Starmer was right to take a hard line against anti-asylum seeker street violence.

But this government is generally incompetent. It’s also amazingly dishonest and hypocritical.

I don’t believe Starmer achieved anything with Trump that any PM couldn’t have done. I haven’t seen any tangible benefit from Starmer’s Euro reset. Though he does seem to have forged a good relationship with Meloni.

And you are now saying Labour isn’t your choice. Righty ho.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 14/11/2025 18:36

Notagain75 · 14/11/2025 17:23

Real change takes a lot of time. I have worked on policy in Government and it can take a year or more to get a Bill.through Parliament and that is without factoring in all the policy work that has to happen before. And delivery takes a lot longer. Change doesn't happen overnight
But whether you believe it or not a lot of pledges have been fulfilled or are in progress.
https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/

This tracker has been complied independently and shows

18 pledges achieved
18 on track
22 in progress
3 off track
1 not kept
6 unclear.
I think that is pretty good.
They did say before the elections that it would take two terms to effect real change

Edited

When the pledges achieved include things like introducing a supervised tooth brushing scheme for 3 or 5 year olds the phrase ‘fiddling while Rome burns’ springs to mind. Or, marking your own homework when you set the questions.

For example, of the others they mark as green, a disproportional number either involve spending money, or are simply meaningless without delivery.

They have marked themselves as green for updating the national planning policy and reintroduced mandatory housing targets. But the number of houses built since they’ve been in power is down by a third, and there is absolutely no way there are meeting their mandatory target of 1.5 million. It’s ludicrous to give yourself a target of setting a target, and mark that as green because you set a 1.5 million target, when that doesn’t actually result in any more houses. In fact, it’s resulted in less.

edited for repitition!

dwordle · 14/11/2025 19:16

itsthetea · 14/11/2025 10:43

we want things and we don’t want to pay for them so we will scream and scream and scream and make ourselves sick and then complain there is no one looking after us

she does need to fix the housing market and that means people not making hundreds of thousands simply by owning a house long term

Totally agree, the media machine has been against Labour from the start....it's time for people to give labour the time and be patient.

They are making progress

Ilikewinter · 14/11/2025 19:17

luckylavender · 14/11/2025 10:52

Nope. Feel really sorry for her

Why?, she's completely incompetent at her job.

TeenagersAngst · 14/11/2025 19:44

GeneralPeter · 14/11/2025 13:49

It’s a tough job but I think she’s doing it badly.

What makes me despair:

This govt was meant to be all about growth. It’s desperately needed. There’s reasonable cross-party consensus on major things we need: housing, tax reform, energy costs. And with a massive majority they should be able to do some unpopular pro-growth stuff too.

Instead they endlessly talk not about growth, but raising tax and cutting spending. But seem incapable of actually doing either, so it’s all for nothing. Destroy business confidence and political capital, making no progress on tax and spend and totally neglecting the real urgent issue they said their government was going to be all about.

Edited

Couldn’t agree more.

TeenagersAngst · 14/11/2025 19:50

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 13:59

Growth has escaped all major economies in Europe, i don't think its thats easy to achieve.
I do think our rush to go electric has wrecked European car manufacturing, opening it up to the Chinese and done nothing for the environment or growth.

Same could be said for many Green economic policies.

Growth requires tax cuts and deregulation for business. Europe is traditionally not keen on either.

EmpressoftheMundane · 14/11/2025 19:55

She can win. She can do what she truly believes is in the national interest and forget about being popular.

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 19:58

TeenagersAngst · 14/11/2025 19:50

Growth requires tax cuts and deregulation for business. Europe is traditionally not keen on either.

Didn't we have 14 years of that? or at least 10years leading into the pandemic.

Growth requires investment, both private and public.

Deregulation for business, usually means tougher times for employees, i can't see that being popular.

EasternStandard · 14/11/2025 20:05

EmpressoftheMundane · 14/11/2025 19:55

She can win. She can do what she truly believes is in the national interest and forget about being popular.

Does she know what that is? Not sure it’s the case, for Starmer too.

TeenagersAngst · 14/11/2025 20:08

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 19:58

Didn't we have 14 years of that? or at least 10years leading into the pandemic.

Growth requires investment, both private and public.

Deregulation for business, usually means tougher times for employees, i can't see that being popular.

No, we haven’t had 14 years of that. We had austerity, low investment, Brexit and Covid.

Southernecho · 14/11/2025 20:09

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 14/11/2025 17:58

No. I was in favour of WFA cuts (even though Darren Jones in opposition lambasted the Tories for even considering it 🙄). I was in favour of Kendall’s downward pressure on welfare. Both were sunk by Labour MPs.

I’m in favour of prison reform.

I thought Starmer was right to take a hard line against anti-asylum seeker street violence.

But this government is generally incompetent. It’s also amazingly dishonest and hypocritical.

I don’t believe Starmer achieved anything with Trump that any PM couldn’t have done. I haven’t seen any tangible benefit from Starmer’s Euro reset. Though he does seem to have forged a good relationship with Meloni.

And you are now saying Labour isn’t your choice. Righty ho.

Yes thats what i said, i voted Labour in 1997 but not since, i just think it would be better to at least give them a chance, they have only just got in.

Its a great pity the Tories allowed welfare to boom, keeping unemployment figures low and did nothing about prisons, which to be fair have been underfunded for many decades, its simply not a popular way to spend taxes on.

On Trump, the Tories achieved nothing with him during his first term, he despised May and i suspect he would Sunak too.

Trump and Starmer, surprisingly, seem to get on well, saying "oh but anyone could the same" is rather silly, there is no parallel universe.

TeenagersAngst · 14/11/2025 20:10

We also adopted an economic model that relied heavily on high immigration and a large labour supply rather than investing in new capital and technology which has ultimately limited GDP per capita growth.

And encouraged the growth of a bloated welfare state.

38thparallel · 14/11/2025 20:14

As for why we're not rejoining- come on, you know this one, it would be like handing the keys to Downing Street to Farage on a plate.

@Fletchasketch
I’m sure I’ve read on here that nowadays polls are showing a desire to rejoin. if Brexit is now so unpopular do you think Starmer should have another referendum?

Zanatdy · 14/11/2025 20:18

Agree she can’t win. When they got into office they said they’d inherited a big black hole and needed to tackle it. But no-one wants to pay for it, either disability cuts, or extra tax. Of course no-one wants to pay more, but you can’t then complain the country is still in a mess.

Sticking to a manifesto is like buying a business, and submitting your business plan to the bank. Then finding out all the crap equipment needs replacing, there’s a hole in the roof and none of the investors want to pay for it, but expect it to fixed yesterday.

My opinion, is savings can be found with in work benefits. I know multiple people who are working the minimum 16hrs and getting topped up, because they are not much better off working full time. Increase the minimum hours to 24 and save a fortune. Also no requirement for 2nd parent to work in a couple, meaning one parent can be a SAHM and topped up. My parents worked opposite shifts when I was growing up, mum nights, dad days, and sometimes they’d keep the car running whilst they swapped over. Had the Government been paying them just a bit less for one to stay at home, doubt they’d have worked their ass off in a factory job.

Happyjoe · 14/11/2025 20:36

Notagain75 · 14/11/2025 17:23

Real change takes a lot of time. I have worked on policy in Government and it can take a year or more to get a Bill.through Parliament and that is without factoring in all the policy work that has to happen before. And delivery takes a lot longer. Change doesn't happen overnight
But whether you believe it or not a lot of pledges have been fulfilled or are in progress.
https://fullfact.org/government-tracker/

This tracker has been complied independently and shows

18 pledges achieved
18 on track
22 in progress
3 off track
1 not kept
6 unclear.
I think that is pretty good.
They did say before the elections that it would take two terms to effect real change

Edited

I think everyone should look at that before they complain tbh.

And this, from the last party in charge.. a whopping amount of money, gone.

https://www.bestforbritain.org/scandalous_spending_tracker

I just do not understand how short people's memories are, or actually remember that the mess that was left was huge, it takes time and money to sort it. The British press should be made to report on facts, no spin left or right, just plain facts.

HearMeOutt · 14/11/2025 20:37

YANBU. We are up shit creek without a paddle and the only thing that can save us, rather than robbing Peter to pay Paul or asking Wonga for a loan, are policies that will grow the economy which means tax cuts and therefore austerity mark 2. It needs to happen, Labour know it needs to happen, the Tories know it needs to happen, Reform know it needs to happen, the only party that doesn’t is the Greens because they think selling dreamcatchers and taxing billionaires who don’t even live here is an acceptable way to run an economy.

EasternStandard · 14/11/2025 20:41

HearMeOutt · 14/11/2025 20:37

YANBU. We are up shit creek without a paddle and the only thing that can save us, rather than robbing Peter to pay Paul or asking Wonga for a loan, are policies that will grow the economy which means tax cuts and therefore austerity mark 2. It needs to happen, Labour know it needs to happen, the Tories know it needs to happen, Reform know it needs to happen, the only party that doesn’t is the Greens because they think selling dreamcatchers and taxing billionaires who don’t even live here is an acceptable way to run an economy.

Labour don’t know this needs to happen?

HearMeOutt · 14/11/2025 20:47

EasternStandard · 14/11/2025 20:41

Labour don’t know this needs to happen?

They know alright they just can’t make it happen with their barmy backbenchers vetoing everything sensible they try to do.

BIossomtoes · 14/11/2025 20:50

HearMeOutt · 14/11/2025 20:47

They know alright they just can’t make it happen with their barmy backbenchers vetoing everything sensible they try to do.

They could employ some party discipline. Blair’s MPs wouldn’t have dared behave like this.

Happyjoe · 14/11/2025 20:55

Austerity doesn't work very well.. it can stifle growth, cause excess deaths too.. it's just daft to carry on with something that has already played a part in the mess we are in now imo.