The quote element failed - this is a reply to @Thoughtsonstuff saying
"I did approve of Elon Musk highlighting the child grooming gang scandal though. Although that seems to have been kicked into the long grass again."
Did you? Let me attempt to change your mind.
Firstly, let's not forget that Musk called Jess Phillips, a woman who has devoted much of her political life to tacking VAWG, and who supports victims of grooming, as a "rape apologist". Which isn't so much misinformation as full-on DARVO.
Secondly - I would urge you to read the Jay Report into this issue. It's a long read, and a hard one. I covered this report as a journalist, and also listened to the evidence given to select committees on this issue as well. Some of the stuff I heard has never left me.
I would say to you that national public inquiries have been used as political footballs for some time - calling for one in bad faith (not because you think it's the best response but because you know the government won't do it because it's not the best response and then you get to make them look bad) or holding one because it's an expensive, time-consuming way of kicking the can down the road.
The Jay report wasn't one of those instances, but it had a difficult birth because no one was seen as being good enough to do it - have a look here at Wikipedia under "Chair of Inquiry" for more details. That's all accurate.
The report is excellent but has never been fully implemented. So my view as someone who knows a lot more about UK public inquiries than Elon Musk, and as someone who has studied the Jay Report in detail, that the first and only thing that needs doing is implementing the Jay findings in full. That and having a better response from social services, who didn't get enough heat on the aspects of the report findings relating to them being too weak on challenging bad behaviour from older ethnic minority men for fear of being thought racist, and making assumptions on the life choices of teenage white, working class girls.
The media did not help on this. Sarah Champion wrote an opinion piece which was a straightforward assessment of the Jay evidence and got called a racist for doing so. This is a difficult paragraph to write because the whole episode gave succour to actual racists, but the report found that while child sexual abuse is not prevalent in any particular ethnicity (so claiming that kids are at especial risk from any particular ethnic group is bollocks) - that there is a mindset among a subset of south Asian heritage predators that white working class girls are fair game because they wear short skirts / are out late.
So. I do agree with the current government that before having any further national inquiry, we should do what Alexis Jay recommended, at speed. Then we can talk further. But - and here's the kicker - while I agree with them on that, I would like to see evidence of them implementing those recommendations.