Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Anyone else irritated by the media coverage of budget?

354 replies

flymetothemoo · 20/10/2024 13:35

Clearly, if it was at all possible then Labour would want to spend billions / on public services, fixing everything. The fact that they are having to be so frugal is NOT what they would choose, politically or materially!

Clearly it's the last government's fault we are in this position. And yet Labour are the bad guys, according to the press, and even the BBC and the Guardian are contributing to this stoking of negativity and fear.

What are they supposed to do in terms of the budget?

They must find the money from somewhere. They've promised to protect working people, employees NI, income tax etc. So they have to find it from somewhere. It might be employers, or inheritance tax loopholes, or benefit loopholes.

They are damned if they do and if they don't aren't they?

OP posts:
Blanketyre · 21/10/2024 10:01

An income tax rise that EVERYONE pays would have been totally fine. And sown less divisiveness.

SerendipityJane · 21/10/2024 10:06

There isn't any media coverage of the budget because - last time I checked - there hasn't been a budget. You may as well read the daily horoscope if you want that level of accuracy.

There has been a lot of media speculation - which is pretty partisan and therefore of little use.

However, the good thing is when you have so much noise, it's much much easier to hide anything of significance. Which is quite kind of our media I think. Imagine if they were really doing their job :?

MrsSkylerWhite · 21/10/2024 10:07

Yep.

Blanketyre · 21/10/2024 10:08

SerendipityJane · 21/10/2024 10:06

There isn't any media coverage of the budget because - last time I checked - there hasn't been a budget. You may as well read the daily horoscope if you want that level of accuracy.

There has been a lot of media speculation - which is pretty partisan and therefore of little use.

However, the good thing is when you have so much noise, it's much much easier to hide anything of significance. Which is quite kind of our media I think. Imagine if they were really doing their job :?

It's not speculation. They aren't literally making it up out of nowhere. SPADS are 'suggesting' and leaking possibilities and ideas so that they can see what reaction they get.

Noname99 · 21/10/2024 10:09

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 09:15

Yes, it’s an interesting philosophy, coming from socialists.

It’s baffling this response! “I agree with it but think the threshold should have been moved” but they didn’t move the threshold so you either don’t agree (but can’t bare to say) or you do agree in which case you know full bloody well that there are tens of thousands pensioners living just above the poverty line on a state pension who will find this cut life changing. But that’s ok apparently because some pensioners are also millionaires??! It’s bizarre!

Noname99 · 21/10/2024 10:11

SerendipityJane · 21/10/2024 10:06

There isn't any media coverage of the budget because - last time I checked - there hasn't been a budget. You may as well read the daily horoscope if you want that level of accuracy.

There has been a lot of media speculation - which is pretty partisan and therefore of little use.

However, the good thing is when you have so much noise, it's much much easier to hide anything of significance. Which is quite kind of our media I think. Imagine if they were really doing their job :?

You are beyond naive if you don’t realise that the SPADs are out in force briefing the media to see how it floats. Every govt does this. Every single one.

Blanketyre · 21/10/2024 10:13

And lo and behold - a new announcement on a public 'NHS consultation'. Just to soften us up for a punishing budget.

It is called 'budget framing'.

EasternStandard · 21/10/2024 10:13

Noname99 · 21/10/2024 10:11

You are beyond naive if you don’t realise that the SPADs are out in force briefing the media to see how it floats. Every govt does this. Every single one.

Agree. And not forgetting the actual doom press conference very early on from Starmer to prepare people for ‘pain’

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 10:19

The frothing on MN is irritating too.

RhubarbAndCustardSweets · 21/10/2024 10:20

Yep.

It goes a bit like this.

Think Tank publishes a document outlining all the possibilities that the Chancellor could do to balance the books. Includes suggestion of adding 50% tax rate on sales of Facebook Market Lights In Decorative Bottle.

Two days later:

Media: "Coming This Autumn! Miserly Chancellor Could TAX Your Hard Earned Cash From Sales Of Facebook Tat!

Two days later:

Mumsnet: AIBU to think 50% tax on Facebook Tat is too much? I know it looks awful, but this seems a little unfair when Janice next door is going on holiday five times a year with her 16 kids and doesn't work.

Repeat ad nauseum.

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 10:20

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 10:19

The frothing on MN is irritating too.

No frothing - just cold, articulated views.

Nice try though.

Blanketyre · 21/10/2024 10:21

I've actually been very cheered by how a lot of mumsnetters have a good grasp of economics and politics.

Blanketyre · 21/10/2024 10:22

RhubarbAndCustardSweets · 21/10/2024 10:20

Yep.

It goes a bit like this.

Think Tank publishes a document outlining all the possibilities that the Chancellor could do to balance the books. Includes suggestion of adding 50% tax rate on sales of Facebook Market Lights In Decorative Bottle.

Two days later:

Media: "Coming This Autumn! Miserly Chancellor Could TAX Your Hard Earned Cash From Sales Of Facebook Tat!

Two days later:

Mumsnet: AIBU to think 50% tax on Facebook Tat is too much? I know it looks awful, but this seems a little unfair when Janice next door is going on holiday five times a year with her 16 kids and doesn't work.

Repeat ad nauseum.

Well, yes but add the SPADS then thinking hmm maybe that 50% tax won't fly after all, and slowly withdrawing it.

friendlycat · 21/10/2024 10:22

Noname99 · 21/10/2024 09:40

If you don’t want endless speculation then perhaps don’t set a budget date for months after you come to power (the first time a new govt hasn’t had a budget ready go within weeks) and then hold multiple press conference telling everyone how awful it’s going to be and then leak multiple scenarios to the press to see how they fly. (Most govt do the last one but not over months!)

They’ve utterly screwed themselves with their stupid ideological stunts and no tax rises on ‘working people’ I think a huge amount of people would have gone with a tax rise especially if we’d all had to contribute. That’s what drives most people I know crazy - this broad shoulders nonsense as if that group aren’t already carrying the majority of the burden now. If you want scandi style services then like in those country EVERYONE has to pay. Not the same group over and over again

Absolutely this.

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 10:28

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 10:20

No frothing - just cold, articulated views.

Nice try though.

You clearly haven't seen some of the threads I have seen!

For example all the frothing about the (imagined) abolition of the single person discount by people who don't understand devolution.

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 10:37

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 10:28

You clearly haven't seen some of the threads I have seen!

For example all the frothing about the (imagined) abolition of the single person discount by people who don't understand devolution.

Edited

You say you find certain posts ‘irritating’.

Most people avoid irritants if they can.

ComingBackHome · 21/10/2024 10:40

Clearly, if it was at all possible then Labour would want to spend billions / on public services, fixing everything.

I think that’s a very naive poverty tbh.
Of course the press is after Starmer. Nothing new there.

But I’m struggling to see how their policies has anything to do with what one would call’traditional’ labour.

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 11:04

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 10:37

You say you find certain posts ‘irritating’.

Most people avoid irritants if they can.

It would be very quiet on MN if people avoided posting on any thread which irritated them!

Being irritated by threads spreading misinformation, such as in the example I posted, is fairly normal as is wanting to correct the misinformation.

Blanketyre · 21/10/2024 11:06

ComingBackHome · 21/10/2024 10:40

Clearly, if it was at all possible then Labour would want to spend billions / on public services, fixing everything.

I think that’s a very naive poverty tbh.
Of course the press is after Starmer. Nothing new there.

But I’m struggling to see how their policies has anything to do with what one would call’traditional’ labour.

There is nothing that Keir Starmers Labour have said that makes me think they want to 'fix everything'.

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 11:06

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 11:04

It would be very quiet on MN if people avoided posting on any thread which irritated them!

Being irritated by threads spreading misinformation, such as in the example I posted, is fairly normal as is wanting to correct the misinformation.

Your initial post asserted you found ‘the frothing irritating’.

No context, no contra-argument, no moving the debate forward.

LikeABat · 21/10/2024 11:13

Blanketyre · 20/10/2024 15:50

Labour shouldn't have ruled out a penny on the pound on income tax. When I heard they had ruled that out my heart sank. Now they are scraping around desperately.

Agree. Combined with unfreezing of the personal allowance. And the mess I went the hasty removal of the WInter fuel allowance creating yet another cliff edge in the tax and benefits system. Hope they can sort these out in the next 5 years.

PandoraSox · 21/10/2024 11:16

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 11:06

Your initial post asserted you found ‘the frothing irritating’.

No context, no contra-argument, no moving the debate forward.

I was answering the OP's question by saying that I find the frothing on MN irritating too.

I am not sure why you are so, erm, irritated by what I posted. But let's leave it there, shall we?

Rockalittle78 · 21/10/2024 11:18

I’m happy to continue, and I’m genuinely not irritated.

My watch shows my RHR as 61 BPM this morning.

Probably the double espresso.

Lets carry on please.

twomanyfrogsinabox · 21/10/2024 11:22

The budget hasn't happened yet, I'll wait to see what everyone thinks when it does, speculation is just that. But I'm not expecting it to be helpful to me, which I guess is what Labour want people to think so it will be a relief if it's not dire.

Q2C4 · 21/10/2024 11:33

@Noname99 is spot on. The government are testing the waters via SPADs floating possible options to the press and judging the reaction.

I am surprised that the government weren't more prepared - I thought they would have had more of a strategic plan. Feels like they are making it up as they go along.