@EasternStandard
”
Pushing for higher tax isn’t cost free either. You can see it impact the private sector already, which will reduce public funds.“
No one ever said it is cost free. And it won’t reduce public funds, not a single one of the many analysis has noted that as a likely outcome.
But doing nothing is also not cost free. All the broken waste water treatments plants, all the crumbling schools with RAAC, the fact not a single new reservoir has been built, anywhere, for 35 years, despite population increasing over 10 million in that time, the crumbling hospitals. That is all a result of trying to keep costs down and ‘taxes low’.
And it didn’t work! We didn’t see increased investment by private sector (the opposite), we didn’t see increased GDP per capita (it fell), we haven’t seen improvements to productivity (it’s falling), we haven’t seen increased wages and ‘a high wage economy’ (we’ve fewer apprenticeships and need immigration to provide skills) and we’ve got 10 million economically inactive. continuing with the status quo isn’t an option unless you accept managed decline.
As a business owner myself, i know the burden that has been added, but reality is and despite the screaming, it’s a relatively small addition to costs in the grand scheme of things. Big retail are shouting, but that’s because they rely on dirt cheap labour and it’s now not quite as cheap as it was. I’m sure they will pass it on, but if it means that kids can go to school without threat of a ceiling caving in, nurses can work without breathing in asbestos, or if a 13yr old can get a referral for an “urgent” spinal condition in less than 40 weeks (this is the estimate my 13yr old has been told today BTW), isn’t that a price worth paying?