I agree, the problem is complex. Costs have risen while incomes fall. Things are now at the level where you actually need to be well-off to live what we call a decent life. The rich-poor divide has already happened; only the welfare system has been bridging the gap.
If we, as a country, accept that:
[a] Businesses must be able to operate profitably, and
[b] Our people must be able to live reasonably:
Then we must conduct some form of wealth distribution (from profitable -> unable to live decently). That's what the welfare system is intended for.
The ConDems are now saying they don't want the redistribution, therefore [b] is no longer a requirement. They're trying to overcome moral resistance to this cruelty, by portraying the poor as greedy parasites, clutching at the business owner's profits.
This from the Benefits & Work newsletter:
The coalition have stooped to new levels of viciousness this month.
They now propose to end exemption from employment and support allowance (ESA) medicals for people enduring the debilitating misery of chemotherapy. They also want to claw back mortgage interest payments from the estates of dead claimants.
In addition, credit checking agency Experian are to be used as ?bounty hunters? to go through claimants confidential financial records for evidence of fraud.
And the DWP have also teamed up with national charity Crimestoppers in a campaign which shows people with faces contorted with rage and fury ? and even raising a fist ? as they think about claimants they believe are committing fraud.
This is a deliberate alienation campaign. I wonder how long before we see films of rats running out of sewers, juxtaposed with images of disabled claimants? (Reference to Nazi anti-jewish advertisements, for those too young ... The campaigns worked, as we know.)