Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Internships

55 replies

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:06

Cleggers wants competition for unpaid internship how wonderful, all it will mean is one overprivileged rich bastards offspring competing with other rich bastards offspring.

Nick FFS wake up! the poor need to work that is if their are any jobs for them when you and the Tory filth have finished you quisling scum

OP posts:
glasnost · 06/04/2011 22:18

Have you been on the pop op?? (See what I did there?)

I understand your sense of self loathing as you effectively voted in this vile coalition but enough already. Let Clegg lie. He counts for less than zilch.

southeastastra · 06/04/2011 22:20

haven't internships always worked that way though

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:22

glas, had one glass of wine :o

I understand your sense of self loathing as you effectively voted in this vile coalition.

Thats a tad unfair, I admit I did and mostly always have voted LD but I did not expect them to support the Tories.

If I buy a Magnum I dont expect it to contain maggots when I bite it.

OP posts:
newwave · 06/04/2011 22:24

haven't internships always worked that way though.

Mostly yes, who you know not what you know

OP posts:
glasnost · 06/04/2011 22:25

Don't buy a corporate Magnum (tm) in the first place when you can have real deal yummy scrummy socialist handmade creamy ice cream. Slurp!

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:31

Unpaid internships are just a way of making sure the working class don't get into some professions, no matter how well qualified or bright they are.

OP posts:
longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:32

The idea of auctioning off internships is disgusting. I fully support it being made illegal. It was a dark day for the Tory party when they did it at their Black & White ball. I can't think of a worse way to entrench privilege.

What should definitely not be illegal though is basic work shadowing/work experience. Companies don't have to offer it at all - if it becomes too expensive and over-regulated, they just won't bother. Why would I bother paying a spotty teenager minimum wage to follow me around all day, asking stupid questions? I do it at the moment as a civic duty - but it is a pain. It's already a chore - if it actually starts costing me money as well as time, sorry, but no way.

In my experience, successful meritocratic companies don't recruit based on who you know anyway - though obviously the world of politics is very different.

At an old company I worked for, a personal recommendation from an existing employee guaranteed that a candidate (at any level) would be interviewed - ie, it meant they automatically got through the CV screening, a process in which about 50% of candidates were rejected - but the interviews were just as rigorous as for any other candidate. Indeed, subconsciously , we probably set the bar higher.

The real bar to education is that state schools are - by and large - crap. The free schools, academies, and destruction of the teaching unions will improve them. Education is the one area of government policy which I endorse wholeheartedly.

southeastastra · 06/04/2011 22:33

i suppose it depends on what profession they mean though.

longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:33

Sorry - that last paragraph should start "the real bar to aspiration"

LegoStuckinMyhoover · 06/04/2011 22:34

did someone say free school in the UK?

which one worked and was good? have you got the link to the school? am genuinely interested!

glasnost · 06/04/2011 22:38

Who can afford to work FOR FREE? Duh. No brainer. It amazes me as an abroad living type person just how the once Great(ish) Britian has regressed. It's just what's happened in the States and you're being dragged back into unelightened times. Where's Voltaire when you need him?

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:38

LFN, you are working under a misapprehension, teachers in so called free schools will have as much right to be a member of a union and to be represented by them during any dispute as in any other school.

OP posts:
longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:40

There aren't any Free Schools up and running, as I understand, but they will start from this September I think.

There are of course several academies.

LegoStuckinMyhoover · 06/04/2011 22:42

I know LFN, that is my point. Grin

longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:42

newwave In Free Schools and Academies, heads will have the power to promote on merit, not on seniority. They will be far more able to sack bad teachers.

By allowing parents to have genuine choice, the interests of pupils will finally come first, instead of teachers. Sure, a teacher in a Free School might be a member of a union - but they won't be able to blackmail the government en masse like they do now. And if a union can't hold the public to ransom, en masse, then it is, in effect, neutered.

LegoStuckinMyhoover · 06/04/2011 22:44

And academies? number for number-really how do they stack up and don't their teachers belong to unions?

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:45

Isnt the first one going to be the:

TOBY YOUNGS ACADEMY FOR MY DELICATE AND FRAGILE CHILDREN PAID FOR BY THE TAXPAYER SO THEY DONT HAVE TO MIX WITH THE HOI POLOI SCHOOL

OP posts:
longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:47

glasnost That's the point. It's not working for free. It's following round someone who is working for a couple weeks, to see what it's like.

Real internships, where candidates who have almost graduated do actual work for several months (like in big engineering companies like Rolls-Royce, multinationals like Unilever, investment banks like Goldman Sachs, etc.) - are usually quite well paid.

Law and politics are exceptions to this rule.

In any case, though, if companies are forced to pay work experience candidates, the real changes will come in small and medium businesses. They just won't bother. Why would they?

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:48

LFN A strike in the state schools for say a pay rise can include any so called free schools, I doubt it would be considered secondary action.

OP posts:
longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:49

newwave I'm not sure if the West London free school is going to be the first - just the most famous. I don't particularly like Toby Young but at least he is improving our country by playing such a pivotal part in destroying the teaching unions.

longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:49

newwave That's the whole point. Pay in free schools isn't set according to national standards. It is set by the head, according to merit.

glasnost · 06/04/2011 22:50

"And if a union can't hold the public to ransom, en masse, then it is, in effect, neutered."

Why don't we just outlaw unions then longtalons as your hero Walker is effectively doing in Wisconsin ILLEGALLY. I had hoped you were an incisive wind up merchant a la Chris Morris but must now realise you're just a rabidly rightwing loon.

Have fun in feudalism. That's where y'all heading. Set up your very own Tea Party why dontcha.

LegoStuckinMyhoover · 06/04/2011 22:51

yes newwave. i think i heard of that school. i reeeeeeeeealy want my children to attend as I heard that he knows a lot about how children learn and he has lots and lots of experience in this area too Hmm.

longfingernails · 06/04/2011 22:55

glasnost I thoroughly endorse what Gov Walker is doing in Wisconsin. Sadly, I recognise that the British public is not with me on that one.

I do think unions have a crucial role to play in society. That role is limited to ensuring health and safety is not compromised for dangerous jobs.

There is no need for any collective bargaining on wages, conditions, or job security. It fosters a culture of mediocrity. It prevents the sacking of bad workers, and the promotion of good workers.

Finally, there is no case for public sector unions whatsoever. The public democratically elects representatives to set terms and conditions for public sector workers on our behalf. If they take bad decisions, then they can be held accountable by kicking them out at the next election. Why should public sector unions be able to thwart democracy?

newwave · 06/04/2011 22:56

Lego, do you mean you dont want your children to learn Latin, bloody Philistine. :o

OP posts: