Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Philosophy/religion

Join our Philosophy forum to discuss religion and spirituality.

So why don't women cover their heads in church then?

31 replies

needmorecoffee · 21/10/2008 19:15

When Paul in Corinthians clearly says its a must?

OP posts:
thegirlwiththecurl · 28/10/2008 17:08

and just to clearify an earlier post about nuns - they don't always cover their heads. i have just come out of a theology lecture taught by a fantastic nun who was wearing 'civvies'

MsHighwater · 29/10/2008 14:42

I agree with rlp and thegirlwiththecurl about the need to interpret. What annoys me is the way some people pick and choose which bits are supposed to be subject to interpretation. The example closest to my heart is the part I referred to previously about the relationship between husbands and wives. As far as I'm concerned, for either my dh or me to be regarded as "the boss" in our marriage would be a perversion of our commitment to one another. If we differ over something, it depends on various things whose view prevails.

QueenFee · 03/11/2008 23:23

I still do. Although many people I know feel that hair is given in lieu of a veil so that covers the head. Each passage of the bible is given to us to help us in our lives here and it is between us and God how we interpret that. I wouldn't have a problem if someone did or didn't it's personal.

CarGirl · 03/11/2008 23:28

It was a cultural issue, one race traditionally covered their heads (possibly all the time) the other didn't, Paul said all the women should cover their heads because it was a disraction as people were drawn to the differences of the 2 races type of thing.

It was a particular instruction as a solution to a particular problem at that point of time.

You always need to read the passages around a verse to absorbs its context?

ibblewob · 04/11/2008 00:14

I think that some things are not "Salvation Issues" - i.e. things like dress that can be interpreted in different ways, but as long as you get the gist of the matter (respectable dress in whatever form), it's not that important.

I totally disagree though that just because some things are open to interpretation, then everything Paul said about women is irrelevant, out-dated or just down to culture.

In some modern, English, fairly middle-class homes, the husband is still considered the head of the house - but then, he is required to love his wife 'as Christ loved the Church' - i.e. sacrifically, giving everything up, including his own life. It's no chore to submit to someone with that attitude. (See Ephesians 5)

KayHiding · 04/11/2008 21:08

Well, I still cover my head in church, because I am an absolute fox with hair like Penelope Cruz, and it would be a dreadful distraction.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page