Ways of looking at the bible - my apologies in advance for a theology lecture
You should realise that, while all Christians agree that the bible is important, we have very different ways of looking at it.
At one end of the spectrum are the scriptural fundamentalists. They believe in the bible very strongly as being the word of god. And by that, I mean, they believe that every word is there because God wants it to be there. It may have been humans who put pen to paper (quill to parchment?) but the words are as much from God as they would be if they had been given by dictation. There is still a little bit of "wiggle room" on some issues, because our understanding of God's meaning is imperfect, but apart from that we have to take it all completely literally.
Far aay at the other end of the spectrum are Christians who believe that the books of the bible were purely human attempts to write down and explain the history of humanity's relationship with God. They were inspired by events which God was involved in, and by prayers and visions, but the words are those of people attempting to understand and explain things of which their understanding was incomplete. We should therefore learn from their example, but consider it only as history and statements of faith.
And in between these two extremes are the rest of us!
For me, it is not "divine dictation" or just a history book. I believe that God did inspire the words in a fairly direct way, but by "nudging" the writers and editors rather than putting words into their mouths. Therefore, we should take it seriously, but also bear in mind that the various books were written by different people in different circumstances, and that some of what is contained in it was applicable to those people in a way that it does not directly apply to us.