Lol- you keep stating “you of course are wrong”. Are you actually an historian with credible qualifications and experience? Have you made any peer reviewed studies of any of this.? Surely the answers to your questions are obvious as to why one source is considered more credible than another?
You seem to have taken. Christian apologetics and taken it to an Olympic level.
What I’ve learned about some of apologetics learned tactics is to keep putting forward an argument, when that is easily overturned you gaslight the person who has overturned it, saying that they didn’t understand the point? Then move onto another, stating opinion as fact, making their opinions seem like the logical conclusion. I’ve seen it a thousand times, you are trying to do exactly the same lol. It’s like a choreographed dance that Christian apologetics learn.
in fact it’s a pretty standard trick to try and enmesh myth and fact - it happens across many religions and even secret societies. You could take the myth of King Arthur for example. Oh look Geoffrey of Monmouth said King Arthur was conceived at Tintagel castle, well that exists oh look the stories are collaborated by lots of authors, read Mallories accounts - must be true. Robin Hood, oh look Sherwood Forest is real, my god it talks about King John - true story. (In fact both figure have a Christ consciousness- and many similarities in the story clue - still waiting the Foretold second coming of Arthur)
the rather peculiar thing is I think this tactic takes away from the beauty of faith but no doubt I “am of course wrong” in your opinion dressed up as fact.
if there’s so much proof, why are eminent historians not writing book after book about the overwhelming evidence, that would change the world if they could prove the existence of the divine Jesus and therefore the existence of God. why is it mainly evangelical Christian apologists.