Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Philosophy/religion

Join our Philosophy forum to discuss religion and spirituality.

Why do some people find it hard to believe in God? Part 2

648 replies

notfluffyatall · 31/01/2012 11:11

I don't think we've quite finished yet Grin

OP posts:
technodad · 26/02/2012 20:44

Yawn

There is no god - go and do something worthwhile!

HolofernesesHead · 26/02/2012 22:10

TechnoDad, yawn - not that tired old line again! Wink

HolofernesesHead · 26/02/2012 22:19

HiH, I'll have a proper look at those Bible verses when I get the chance. Off the top of my head, James 5 is about healing happening in Christian community, and Mt 18 is all about life in the Christian community. So it's not the case that the Bible always says that God heals miraculously independent of people - the role of people (the 'elders') in James 5 is v. crucial. The line is often repeated in the Gospels, 'your faith has healed you / made you whole', so the role of belief is acknowledged by the Gospel stories.

I'm still not convinced that prayer could ever really be used in a pseudo-scientific experiemnt to disprove God's existence. Like I said earlier, if God has created the world (a big if, I know), then God has created it fragile and decaying, so we shouldn't be surprised that that's what happens to people. How many miracles would it take to prove God's existence, anyway? Just the one, or would there need to be a critical mass? Confused And who'd get to verify it? I think there's a group of people in the RC church (in the Vatican?) who investigate claims of miracles...

As for chaplains having 'authority', I don't know really - I think with most forms of chapliancy it's more about relationship, mutual honour and respect than authority as such, although I think it varies according to local context.

GrimmaTheNome · 26/02/2012 22:34

Prayer can be used in (proper, not pseudo) scientific experiments to prove whether, under those conditions, prayer works or not. They can't prove God doesn't exist - you can't prove a negative; if such experiments showed that prayer did have a positive effect that would be some evidence for the existence of supernatural powers.

No such proof has been forthcoming.

Snorbs · 27/02/2012 09:17

Experiments with prayer could prove the existence of god, if god chose to reveal himself sufficiently. God as an omnipotent being could do any of a huge number of things to unequivocally prove his existence. He could rearrange all the clouds to say "Hi, god here, just thought it would be helpful if I showed myself to stop all the bickering." He could perform a big-ass miracle in Africa and feed the five hundred million.

But he doesn't. Which leads to the conclusion that either he's become surprisingly shy in his old age (compared to the big-ass miracles he is alleged to have performed in the past), or he doesn't care, or he isn't omnipotent, or he doesn't exist.

BonfireOfKleenex · 27/02/2012 09:28

I don't know, it seems that these days, modern 'god' is really just reduced to a metaphor for 'goodness' in people.

There seems to be an emphasis on 'well he won't just answer your prayers, you have to look inside yourself and all will be revealed'. And 'he expresses himself through people, not actual miracles that anyone can see'. Just seems like another way of saying that 'goodness, kindness, empathy, civil society etc is a good thing, and we should all do more of it'.

There's my platitude for the day Grin

BonfireOfKleenex · 27/02/2012 09:30

I'm talking about the 'wishy-washy liberal' CofE brand of god, obviously!

GrimmaTheNome · 27/02/2012 09:41

Well, yes obviously. There is another current god who values a copy of a book more than a human life Sad

LongWayRound · 27/02/2012 10:00

"God has chosen to be made known in Jesus - so for me the primary data wrt to God is Jesus' life, death, resurrection and ascention."

And that for me has always been a large part of the problem. Why would "God" have chosen to be made known to a subset of humanity at a particular place and time? It hardly seems fair on all the other people who either lived too early, or in the wrong part of the world... Frame the question differently, and ask why a group of people living at a particular time and place might have chosen to believe in a particular concept of "God" and that a particular religious teacher was actually a manifestation of this god, and things become a lot clearer. Intellectually fascinating in terms of the development of human thought, but not something worth agonising over.

Snorbs · 27/02/2012 11:39

Indeed. "I'm an omniscient and omnipotent being. I wish to make my presence known on earth. Now, where should I choose to reveal my corporeal form? China, with its advanced civilisation, strong writing skills and careful observers of people and practises? Nah. How about Rome, what with it being the centre of a massive empire, its useful habit of carving contemporaneous records into stone and its amazingly skilled sculptors? Pfft. I know! I'll choose a relatively backwards society that favours oral history over written and that is already awash with prophets and people performing magic tricks! Perfect! And if I make much the same prophecies and perform much the same magic tricks, they're bound to realise that I'm the real thing!"

For an omniscient being, god's got an extraordinary track record for not thinking things through properly.

GrimmaTheNome · 27/02/2012 11:46

Ah well, he works in mysterious ways you know.

technodad · 27/02/2012 12:51

I can't believe people have stuck with this debate for over 1600 posts!

I stand by my first post on this thread (07-Feb-12 12:47:35) when I said:

At the end of the day, since religion is based upon "faith" and science is only based upon "facts", the discussion is pretty much pointless. No matter what factual evidence is presented, if your mind is "wired" so that it values faith over evidence it is impossible to have an intelligent and rational discussion about why god doesn't exist.

I would be really interested to know if there is anyone who has read this thread who has been on the fence wanting to decide which way to go (religion or atheism). If this is you, after reading the different arguments being presenting (one based upon a verifiable process and the other based upon politically biased stories misinterpreted and manipulated throughout the ages) has this thread been helpful at all and which way did you leap off the fence?

LongWayRound · 27/02/2012 15:16

Snorbs Grin

HolofernesesHead · 27/02/2012 19:50

Well...

HolofernesesHead · 27/02/2012 20:02

Ah, that's better - for some reason my computer was playing up there. Anyway, I'm intrigued that a 'proper scientific experiment' could verify whether prayer 'works.' I can tell you that it's worked for me for decades, but I don't suppose that would wash...! Grin So, what kind of proper scientific experiment would count? Surely logic dictates that one single, properly scientifically verifiable miracle would verify God's existence, if we are saying that miracles are the primary data for God existing. But what kind of miracle? And who'd get to verify it? No-one with a vested interest either way, surely? But isn't that most people? Really, I'd like to see if this could ever potentially work - I'm not sure it could, but there you go...

As for why God chose to make Godself known through Jesus - there's a very strong thread of thought in the J-C tradition that God chooses the less likely, the weak and the silly over the obvious, the strong and the sensible. It's there all the way from Jacob and Esau to St Paul and beyond.

I could now go into quite a long lecture about how the Christian Bible has been transmitted and translated, and what ancient texts we have - but no doubt you'd all fall asleep! Suffice to say we have more original biblical texts and biblical-contemporary now than ever, and that the differences in English translations aren't going to make or break anyone's faith. They are interesting, and it's certainly very enriching to read the Bible in the original languages, but the English translations we have really are very true to the originals (I think the NRSV is probably the best). So the Christian tradition hasn't done too badly really! Smile

jshm2 · 27/02/2012 20:47

The same people who find it hard to understand why we have speed limits and laws are usually the people who have the most "God problems"

Everyone thinks their "it" and able to self govern themselves but on a calm sea everyone is captain and no human is able to live absolutely selflessly and honestly.

So God is the antithesis to these people, he is perfect so an affront to them and their ideals. Since they cannot attack directly due to lack of numbers they instead attack the laws and institutions under the guise of "reasoning" and "secularising society".

In fact they are just following the same anarchistic principles civilisations before us have succumbed to.

GrimmaTheNome · 27/02/2012 21:11

The same people who find it hard to understand why we have speed limits and laws are usually the people who have the most "God problems"

Really? Grin
That's all so daft and unfounded I doubt you'll find many of us law-abiding, speed-limit keeping, ethical atheists and secularists bothering to take offense at it.

GrimmaTheNome · 27/02/2012 21:12

(come to think maybe it was an example of Holo's 'the weak and the silly over the obvious, the strong and the sensible')

technodad · 27/02/2012 21:18

Anyway, I'm intrigued that a 'proper scientific experiment' could verify whether prayer 'works.' I can tell you that it's worked for me for decades, but I don't suppose that would wash...!

Hi Holo,

I am interested in how you think that prayer has ?worked for you for decades? and what evidence you have for this?

I don?t pray, and I have had good days and bad days. I have the odd beyond-horrendous day when friends have been killed in car crashes or family members have died young from incurable disease. However, I also have the odd great day when really unlikely (nice) things have happened to me, like winning a competition, or getting the job of my dreams.

When things are not going well for me day to day (feeling down or had a bad day at work), I go for a run. This is in many ways a form of meditation just like the act of prayer and more-often than not I feel better afterwards, and therefore more able to deal with my problems. But not because of god, but because the activity relaxes me!

So, what kind of proper scientific experiment would count? Surely logic dictates that one single, properly scientifically verifiable miracle would verify God's existence, if we are saying that miracles are the primary data for God existing. But what kind of miracle? And who'd get to verify it? No-one with a vested interest either way, surely?

Logic does NOT dictate this, because no one will be able to ?verify? any occurrence as a true miracle (i.e. caused directly by god). Clearly if a loud voice came from above and spoke to the world and then a major miracle was done, then that would be sufficient, but from what I understand, that doesn?t seem to be god?s style. At the end of the day, it comes down to defining what a miracle actually is!

  • Is winning the lottery a miracle? No, statistically very unlikely, but wholly possible (it happens to thousands of people every week across the world).
  • Is the same person winning the lottery twice in 4 months a miracle? No, statistically very very unlikely, but there are thousands of lotteries across the world and it is wholly possible (in fact it has already happened somewhere in the USA).
  • Is it a miracle if I am feeling sad and missing a friend and they phone me at the moment I am thinking of them? No, I think about them lots and the vast majority of these occasions they don?t phone, it is just random chance and quite unlikely, but there is no intervention.
  • Is someone being cured of a very aggressive form of cancer a miracle? No, again, very unlikely, but it happens.
  • Is a great flood a miracle? No, sometimes it rains lots.
  • Is a bush catching fire spontaneously a miracle? No, this happens in nature, but is very uncommon.
  • Is a bowling ball floating in the air with no forces acting upon it to make it float a miracle? Yes, this violates Newton?s laws and would be a miracle - but this sort of thing does not happen. Even if it did happen it still wouldn?t be verifiable as being caused by god (although I would be more likely to believe in him - albeit think we was strange for performing such an odd miracle!)

You ask what experiment would be required to prove that prayer works, but some experiments have already been done and prove that it doesn?t work (but you don?t accept them). A good experiment will need a large statistical basis (lots of people) comprising a control group (who do nothing), a placebo group (who think something is being done when it isn?t) and a test group (the actual test subjects).

I presume you are reluctant to accept the previous experiments because they do not fit with your understanding of how god actually answers prayers. In order to put together an experiment, you will need to define how prayer actually ?works? and then I can try to work out a good experiment.

GrimmaTheNome · 27/02/2012 21:19

Anyway, back to the plot... Holo, the Templeton Foundation tried a 'proper' double blind experiment. They are an organisation which genuinely attempts to cross the religious/scientific divide.

The experiment was widely expected by skeptics to show at least a positive placebo effect from prayer; oddly enough the effect was a slight, though statistically significant negative effect. Make of that what you will. Maybe God just wasnt playing ball.

HolofernesesHead · 27/02/2012 21:41

Looks interesting, Grimma...

HolofernesesHead · 27/02/2012 21:56

Just off now, but my thinking behnd saying 'just one miracle', TDad, is this: if we found one sentient alien lifeform on Pluto, that'd prove that senient life exists on Pluto, right? So one (however you want to conceive of it) miracle would logically prove that God must exist. Then the question becomes 'Why doesn't God do more miracles, or different miracles?', which is a valid question, but a different one to the question of God's existence.

As to how prayer works for me...well, I go running too, which does me a power of good! Smile and I have good, bad and in-betwen days (ah, how I love The Cure! Grin) Prayer works for me in lots of ways, tbh - often it'll be a strong senes of God coming to me from without, iyswim, with a peace or wisdom or joy that is something way beyond my normal abilities to muster up. Loads of other things make me feel good, but with prayer there is a kind of 'absolute' quality to it - I think it's because the peace / wisdom / joy / whatever makes me feel connected to God who is the absolute, so there's a sense of feeilng that my whole life is held by God and known by God.

Although tbh, I see all of my life as prayer (at least I try to) so I wouldn't be too keen on drawing very hard and fast lines between what in my life is prayer and what isn't. For me, it's about being open to God and being open to being healed (in body, mind and spirit), transformed and called by God. It's also about being held by the Chhristian tradition, which is why church is so important to me - it's not just about having spiritual experieces but being deeply rooted in a historic religion which involves discipline and commitment, and in which I find much depth, truth and wisdom which brings real freedom and joy, and in which I am given the abilities to start to become more like the person I want to be, the person I believe God has created me to be, which means becoming free of sin and its crap. Which is way miracle enough for me! Which is why I'm not really too fussed about miracles, tbh - because I feel that all of life is already miracle. (Which isn't spin, btw, it's what I really believe and try to live in the light of).

technodad · 27/02/2012 22:11

So it seems that the process of praying is the answer to your prayers (if I have understood your description correctly)?

Himalaya · 27/02/2012 22:56

Hi Grimma
I don't think Templeton is an organisation bringing science and religion together 'in good faith' . From what I understand it is an organisation set up to promote Christianity under the guise of science and spirituality - fir example giving out the million dollar prize to scientists willing to say something nice about religion.

http://m.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/10/nick-cohen-religion-science?cat=commentisfree&type=article read here, and here

Himalaya · 27/02/2012 23:00

I was going to say it's a miracle I posted two long links and they both worked. But there you go Grin

trying again to put my faith in the mysterious brackets