I did that on the last thread!
But okay though, here's the basic outline of what I think:
OT - 4 main strands of tradition. Amazingly high degree of agreement (eg Samuel-Kings uses Psalms, later prophets use earlier ones). There are places at which one book questions another (e.g. Job questions Proverbs, Proverbs questions itself, Ecclesiastes questions everything). Some strands of tradition simply sit aside one another eg Gen 1 - 2, as we've just noted).
What does that tell us? That within this tradition, you're allowed to question. That truth emerges out of a multiplicity of experiences and voices. That God is there is the whole of life, the good and the bad. That belonging to the covenant is the most important thing. That the whole world is God's, and God is God of all the world. And much, much more. So far so good?
NT - 4 gospels that tell the story of the life of Jesus, one of which (Luke) hs a sequel (Acts) which tells the story of the early church - letters written by Paul and others. Revelation is a letter. So far so good? Meaning - richer than I could do justice to here. John 3:16, as you'll know, is often thought of as the gospel in a nutshell:
Thus God loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten son, in order that all who trust in him may not perish, but have eternal life' (my translation from the Greek)
I could say much, much more about the Bible. There is way more meaning in it than a simple, bare set of propositions! (thank God!!!)