When DS was born I got a lot of helpful advice from my mum and extended family about how I should put him down as often as possible so he would get used to it, and how you have to leave babies to cry or they learn that someone will come and they keep doing it Whereas DS was a very clingon baby and I was happy with that. I got a sling and carried him around everywhere, co slept etc. He is now 22m and a happy, confident little soul. My mum now says that this is because of the way DH and I bring him up, which is nice.
Nevertheless, ever since he was about 3 months old (when I was never having any more children, ever, ever again!) she has been going on about how although the attachment parenting type approach is all well and good for a first child, it is just impossible for a second. According to her I will be leaving this one (I am now 16 weeks pg with number two) to cry it out and breast feeding is impossible. I will not have the energy to carry this one around in a sling.
AIBU to think that if I could manage it with DS when I was very, very ill after the birth for some months, then I could manage it with a second baby? Am I just being unrealistic? I think that sticking the new baby in a sling and getting on with things is the ideal solution - then I can meet the needs of DS and the new baby at the same time. I am sure there will be times when one or the other of them will have to wait a while before I can see to them, but it seems daft to me not to try and do it in the easiest way for everyone.
Sorry, this has turned into a rant but it is really starting to get on my nerves. I felt so volunerable last time thinking I was doing the wrong thing by being unable to put him down without a lot of crying from both of us, and I don't want to feel the same way again.