Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Would you let a 4 year old play unsupervised in the garden with water table?

217 replies

wishIwasonholiday10 · 06/04/2026 17:16

My husband and I had a disagreement about this. Would you let an almost 4 year old play unsupervised in the garden with a water table and mud kitchen? The garden is fully fenced with no access to the street.

We both agree no unsupervised play with a paddling pool but disagree on the water table.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
padampada · 07/04/2026 14:03

Surely this is less risky than washing your hands in a basin of water with the plug in? No slipping hazards if its on grass, no hard surface to hit your head and the table will over turn if the child falls on it? Im fairly risk averse when it comes to water and believe most parents are too laid back but this takes it a bit far for an average 4 year old.

DancingonmyOwn88 · 07/04/2026 14:07

ILoveDaffodills · 07/04/2026 12:22

When was the last time (or first time) a fox attacking a 4 year old in their garden (or actually anywhere) was reported??

jesus wept.

The fox thing is mad! Seriously mad. Foxes would bolt at the sight of a lively child splashing around in a water table. Why on earth would they attack it? (I’m agreeing with you by the way but I couldn’t find the original quote saying a fox might randomly enter the garden to attack)

Oh yeah, and if anyone remembers that family with the twins who were ‘attacked’ by a fox that snuck in through and open patio door and slunk upstairs undetected, straight into their bedroom…. That family had a Jack Russel dog. The fox was an incredibly convenient scapegoat in my opinion to avoid that dog being put to sleep.

Foxes get such bad press.

sanityisamyth · 07/04/2026 17:18

Pherian · 07/04/2026 11:18

No. A toddler requires continuous supervision in and outside of the home.

A nearly 4 year old is not a toddler.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Pherian · 07/04/2026 18:26

sanityisamyth · 07/04/2026 17:18

A nearly 4 year old is not a toddler.

you can call a 4 year old whatever you want - but they still require continuous supervision 🤡

Cloop · 07/04/2026 18:51

Pherian · 07/04/2026 18:26

you can call a 4 year old whatever you want - but they still require continuous supervision 🤡

Edited

Genuinely, what do you think happens in schools? They are not supervised at all times. For example, 2 four year olds might be sent to take a piece of paper to the office down a corridor or two. That is totally unremarkable. In the classroom and on the playground, they are not being continually watched.

Hallamule · 07/04/2026 20:00

Pherian · 07/04/2026 18:26

you can call a 4 year old whatever you want - but they still require continuous supervision 🤡

Edited

Yeah, they really don't. I mean, maybe yours do but that's not typical.

Illbethereinaminute · 07/04/2026 20:19

Even toddlers don't need 24/7 supervision...

I toddlerproofed everything I could when mine were little so that I could leave them in the lounge with the door open whilst I cooked in the kitchen/went to the toilet.

How does anybody get anything done if you have to sit and watch a toddler constantly?

Mt563 · 07/04/2026 20:38

Pherian · 07/04/2026 18:26

you can call a 4 year old whatever you want - but they still require continuous supervision 🤡

Edited

They really don't. They need a safe environment and an adult close by. But they also need freedom and independence in order to learn and grow.

wishIwasonholiday10 · 07/04/2026 22:13

Thanks all for the responses! Lots of different opinions on how much supervision a 4 year old needs in the garden so it’s interesting to see different perspectives. She is my first so still trying to work out the balance between safety and letting her have more freedom.

I can see the garden from the kitchen but not clearly from the living room as the back door is not directly from the living room. If I was feeding or settling the baby inside I wouldn’t be able to see DD1 clearly. Last summer I sat in the garden with her but would pop inside to get things.

OP posts:
Hohumitsreallyallthereis · 07/04/2026 23:28

This thread is nuts. No wonder school readiness is a problem.

Missey85 · 08/04/2026 04:10

Cloop · 07/04/2026 12:59

Posts like this really make me despair for Reception teachers. Plenty of children start school in the weeks after they turn 4, even the next day in some cases. Children need some level of independence to develop life skills.

I read a article recently from a high-school teacher who still gets asked to tie their shoes for them because their parents never taught them how 🙁

metellaestinatrio · 08/04/2026 04:39

lovescats3 · 06/04/2026 23:16

Absolutely not, toddlers can drown in a few cm of water

Four year olds are not toddlers. If this child is almost four, they will be starting school in September (and will likely be playing outside with water not constantly supervised by the teacher / TA who may be busy with other children).

firstofallimadelight · 08/04/2026 07:40

Yes especially if I could see out of window

Happytaytos · 08/04/2026 07:46

Pherian · 07/04/2026 18:26

you can call a 4 year old whatever you want - but they still require continuous supervision 🤡

Edited

They really don't.

I'm glad to see your attitude in a minority on this thread. But you need to cut those apron strings and let your 4yo free!

ILoveDaffodills · 08/04/2026 09:29

DancingonmyOwn88 · 07/04/2026 14:07

The fox thing is mad! Seriously mad. Foxes would bolt at the sight of a lively child splashing around in a water table. Why on earth would they attack it? (I’m agreeing with you by the way but I couldn’t find the original quote saying a fox might randomly enter the garden to attack)

Oh yeah, and if anyone remembers that family with the twins who were ‘attacked’ by a fox that snuck in through and open patio door and slunk upstairs undetected, straight into their bedroom…. That family had a Jack Russel dog. The fox was an incredibly convenient scapegoat in my opinion to avoid that dog being put to sleep.

Foxes get such bad press.

Edited

🦊 💕

ILoveDaffodills · 08/04/2026 09:31

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 07/04/2026 13:37

Exactly. Even in the rare cases where it's reported that a baby has been hurt by a fox, it usually turns out later to have been the family dog. And a 4 yo is many times bigger than a fox.

🦊 💕

& noisier!! 🤣

Whatthefork1 · 08/04/2026 15:03

Yes definitely. My daughter is 4.5 and has been playing in our garden alone for about a year now. We have water table, sand pit, various scooters etc. she ends up sweeping the leaves up too 😂
I can see from the kitchen windows and regularly call out to her and ask if she’s okay.

Devongirl1983 · 08/04/2026 15:07

Without a single doubt - same as would you let a 4 year old play inside whilst you hung out washing, did some jobs or had a cup of tea in the garden. My kids were in the garden all day at 4 and i’d go inside for short periods leaving them to play (checked on regularly). The only time I had my eyes on them all the time would be a paddling pool day. If I nipped in the kitchen to make lunch, i’d be watching through the window.

There will be water tables at nursery and it will not be possible for staff to have their eyes on every child 100% of the time.

Devongirl1983 · 08/04/2026 15:12

Hohumitsreallyallthereis · 07/04/2026 23:28

This thread is nuts. No wonder school readiness is a problem.

It always makes me wonder if parents realise their kids wont be watched all the time at nursery/school/holiday club. Our school has an enclosed outdoor play area (just outside the classroom) the kids can go to when its time to play and with one reception teacher and one TA, there’s going to be lots of 4 year olds not being watched at any point. A little bit older and they’re off in the main playground and school field at break.

I pity the poor 4 year olds never allowed to play alone in a secure garden with a parent helicoptering over them.

Mh67 · 08/04/2026 15:22

BeebeeBoyle · 07/04/2026 09:05

But common sense must prevail, and water isn't really involved at all. The table would collapse or the child slide off if they fainted onto the table (I've never heard of a healthy 4 year old fainting but presumably it is possible). The water would slosh out and the child would be unaffected by it. The water in this instance holds no danger.
It's almost like religious zealots not allowing themselves to see basic facts. They just have "water? NO" with no rational thought.
The tiny, TINY chance of danger would be smaller than getting in a car to drive to the shops or having an upstairs in your home or leaving the hallway light switched on.

your reply is terrifying I've worked in nurseries for over 20 years and water trays are dangerous. A staff member bent down to tie a shoelace and within that second a child had tried to climb in bumped there head and was under the water. Any body of water is a risk and needs supervised

PinkLeopard8 · 08/04/2026 15:26

No I wouldn't. I'm surprised by these replies. I would only pop inside to use the toilet really quickly that is it. Even a couple of inches of water can be a drowning hazard at that age.

Pldafa · 08/04/2026 15:55

Absolutely not. The child is 3 and needs watching. People are ignorant to what could happen in gardens. The child could pick anything like a berry that’s poisonous and snack on it. Could fall over on wet / slippy ground. Imagine going for an x ray and saying oh I’ve got no idea why my 3yo’s arm is hurting/broken as I left him/her in the garden alone.

Confusedasacucumber · 08/04/2026 16:34

I am 100% in agreement but you would be surprised at how many parents genuinely are surprised that their little treasure doesn’t have eyes on him/her at all times if the day!

VividDeer · 08/04/2026 16:37

Absolutely fine! Wouldn't even occur to me its a problem. Although my kids were probably far too attached too me to play alone (annoyingly)

Usernamenotav · 08/04/2026 17:27

Yes I would, but I wpuld be playing with her so it'd only be for a few mins each time anyway. Can't see how it's dangerous.