Just a vent and wondering if I was in the wrong or my dad?
Both me and my DH had work so we asked my parents if they could look after our 4yo ds which they agreed to.
They tend to do the majority of babysitting as my mil has ms and can't look after him by herself and fil works full time and cares for her when he's not working.
DS came home happy but then wanted to watch something. I asked if he'd watched anything earlier, as we try to limit screen time.
He said yes that he watched something before lunch and then after lunch until DH picked him up. Which would have worked out of about 3-4 hrs worth. So I said no and he started crying and getting very worked up. So we phoned my brother to double check. My dad answered and said that was correct. My DH spoke to brother and basically said we try to limit screen time so try not to make this a habit. My dad took over the call and said my brother was upset (brother is autistic) and said we did you a favour looking after ds, you can't put parameters and what we can do when he's with us, and if you don't like it you can get someone else to look after him.
I asked to speak to my brother and said we weren't upset or angry with him, but wanted to check ds was telling us an accurate story. And just try not to give him more than 2 hrs screen time a day. Brother was ok with this. But dad got back on the phone and repeated above.
Are we wrong not to want too much screen time? Especially as it was a nice day and could have had some outdoor play? Or did my dad overreact?