Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

2 under 2's how bad is it really?

29 replies

anniz91 · 06/02/2024 23:04

I'm considering another...BUT is having 2 under 2 really as bad as everyone makes it out to be?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
strawberryswizzler · 06/02/2024 23:05

no. it’s hard at the start because you have to sit down and feed baby a lot and the older one wants you to get up and get a drink, play with them, xyz. once second baby is crawling or sitting up even it all gets easier as time goes on

TomeTome · 06/02/2024 23:08

I’d say to be avoided if possible because of the impact on your body. The care wasn’t impossible for me.

Terrrence · 06/02/2024 23:09

The smaller the age gap the easier it is as the DC are closer developmentally and so can be entertained in a similar manner. This holds true right the way through their childhoods and teenage years.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Whatwouldtaylordo · 06/02/2024 23:09

It's pretty rough. I wouldn't do it again.

TheChosenTwo · 06/02/2024 23:11

Fine for me, 17 months between my eldest 2, they were both pretty chilled and the eldest was very loving towards the new addition.

Multipleexclamationmarks · 06/02/2024 23:12

I didn't find it particularly hard. I've 18 months between my 2. They've generally been into the same thing at the same time, come as a pair kinda thing.

Kendodd · 06/02/2024 23:15

It's brilliant!
I had three under three, it was fine.

GonnaBeYoniThisChristmas · 06/02/2024 23:15

Also didn’t find it awful with an 18 mo age gap.

I mean obviously it’s hard work but the benefits of close in age are great and stuff like nap routines are easy to do for both.

Also you’re so much more relaxed with second baby, everything seems easier.

goodbyestranger · 06/02/2024 23:22

No it’s fine.

Misslauralu · 06/02/2024 23:35

It's when they are older 😂😂😂 mine are 11 and 10 fight like cat and dog 🐕

AngryBirdsNoMore · 06/02/2024 23:39

The first few months were ROUGH. Really really rough.

But DS2 is now 7 months and DS1 is much better at entertaining himself for a few minutes while I sort the baby, and isn’t as jealous of my affections or his toys any more. And they adore each other.

Toddlers and babies are just fundamentally very impatient so you just have to deal with a lot of screaming when they both want something at the same time. I find that psychologically very difficult.

And the hope is that the close age gap will pay off later on!

Appleblum · 06/02/2024 23:41

I found it really hard because my second was a velcro baby and was always crying and grumpy. I think i would have found it extremely challenging even if it was just her alone. However once both hit the 2-3 years old mark things got easier and they're so close now it's a joy to watch them together.

huggyhoo · 06/02/2024 23:43

I just remember feeling stressed all the time. I had a 21 month age gap.

Eh1112 · 06/02/2024 23:55

It was hard at times and easy at others. Both little ones were at a similar developmental stage and so shared lots of interests which was a huge plus. They napped at similar times and both enjoyed going to the park etc. Seven years on now and they are really close. Looking back I would definitely do it again.

blackpanth · 06/02/2024 23:55

I love it so far

Namemchangeforthispostonly101 · 06/02/2024 23:58

This reply has been withdrawn

The OP has privacy concerns, so we've agreed to take this down now.

PeggySooo · 07/02/2024 00:00

Yes. I had 2 under 2, but overall 3 under 5. 26 month gap and 17 month gap.

It was awful and I'd never do it again. They are 7,9 and 11 now and it's okay but it's only been okay in the last few years.

Babyboomtastic · 07/02/2024 00:01

The first few months were a doddle tbh. I used a sling a lot and tbh just embraced being a kangaroo with less jumping. I even breastfed in the sling a lot. I carried on doing most things with the toddler with baby attached.

It got harder after about 7m, and probably reached peak difficulty when the youngest was about 18m. This was apart when my youngests sleep was worst (newborn 2-3hr stretches, 12m 30-90 minute ones).

They are now 4&6 and incredibly close. Very much best friends.

AstorianPlease · 07/02/2024 00:03

I really didn't find it that difficult however my older son has SEN, non verbal and can't walk at the moment so wasn't isn't typical toddler but the baby just slotted right in.

He's 3 and She's 1 now (22 month age gap) and it's still pretty alright.

ferneipe · 07/02/2024 00:10

I found it awful and I went back to work when the youngest was 4 months. DH was around in the evenings and weekends so it was fine when we could divide and conquer, but hugely stressful trying to deal with both their needs in my own. We did get a sleep consultant involved early so they slept through from an early age, which helped - they'd only be home for an hour or so after nursery before going to bed.

I am not a big fan of the baby/toddler years though so I'm glad I got that over with quickly. They are very close now as teens.

AngryBirdsNoMore · 07/02/2024 23:48

Divide and conquer is right @ferneipe. I think without an active partner who was willing to properly be involved, it would be very hard indeed. You can feel a bit outnumbered sometimes.

SouthLondonMum22 · 07/02/2024 23:53

I'm going to have 3 under 2 come April. I'm dreading it to be honest but thankfully the early days go fast even though it doesn't always feel like it.

mondaytosunday · 08/02/2024 00:44

I don't remember it being that hard. I was in my 40s too. I thought two years (20 months to be precise) was a good gap - close enough but not too close.

newmum242 · 08/02/2024 01:30

I'm 3 weeks and definitely questioning it 😅

newmum242 · 08/02/2024 01:30

3 weeks in *