In April, when DS will be nine months, DH and I are both going back to full time work, though I'm planning to rearrange my hours so that I compress them into four and a half days. Ever since I was pregnant my parents said they'd do one day a week childcare, and we were planning to use nursery for the other 3.5 days. Then when DS was born PIL said they would also like to do a day, dropping nursery down to 2.5 days. Wonderful - all incredibly generous and very lucky for us.
The problem is that my PIL mentioned they'd need my parents to cover their day when they went on holiday - but they've now produced a list of when they're away for the rest of this year and my parents feel it's too much for them - they already have my niece once a week, and they don't feel up to doing three days of childcare more than very occasionally, whereas my PIL's plans mean they'd need to do it once or twice every month. Mum was very apologetic when she told me this, and I obviously reiterated that doing any child care is a favour not a requirement and so that of course I don't want them to feel pressured into doing more than they want to. Similarly, obviously we don't want my PIL to change their plans, or to feel any pressure to do so (they don't yet know my parents feel like this).
SO I said to my mum that we'd go back to one day a week grandparent care, which they could roughly alternate around my PILs travel plans. I'm wondering, though, if this is going to be really unsettling for DS - I already wondered whether three care settings (nursery, my parents, PIL) was a bit much for a nine month old and I feel the less often he's at, say, my parents, the less easy it will be for him to get used to that. I'm also a bit worried that this is a sign of things to come in terms of mismatched expectations, etc - everyone involved is lovely, but I am aware that they're offering a big favour and I wonder if they hadn't quite thought about how potentially restrictive it will be. I really don't want to fall out with anyone or cause any awkwardness over this. I wonder whether it would be better for us to just use nursery - but then DS is there for 4.5 days, which is a lot, and also we can't afford that for the nursery we've chosen so would need to use a perfectly fine one that we didn't use quite so much. Plus I think it would offend everyone - but I wonder whether it might avoid later, more serious disharmony? DH is dead against this plan because he thinks it'll really upset everyone and be worse for DS. What do people think? Sorry for the long post!