Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

the big smacking debate part two

83 replies

glitterfairy · 09/06/2004 06:33

This thread is too big now so have started a new one as this discussion is really important I think anyway.

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Batters · 10/06/2004 13:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

bloss · 10/06/2004 13:40

Message withdrawn

gothicmama · 10/06/2004 13:48

I disagree that uniform hides class/money I do not think it does unless it all comes from the same shop everyone wears the same shoes/ has the same bags. Individuality should be embraced if nothing else for the mass producers of clothing to have ashock- uniform whether it is a school one or one which symbolises the group you wish to belong to as a teenager is important but I have always found school uniforms probable help to concentrate the mind but should possible not be so formal although I do think class /money is shown in otherways by children - and some teenagers go out of their way to look "tarty" as a means of expressing their impressions of how women are I blame society and the media in some ways for this as well as an expectation that the area you live in can also give people preconcieved ideas about you

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

two · 10/06/2004 16:30

Saw the smacking element to this thread and wanted to add this.

Think the whole issue of smacking is complex. I never used to think that it was an issue and still think that there is some hysterical reaction to someone smacking a hand.

But recently my sister revealed that my father smacking her was very traumatic, although I was also smacked and never bothered me at all.

It was not that this was in any sense a regular part of our upbringing and my parents do not like smacking as punichment but it happened v rarely when parents under stress. Except that for me, i can't remember anything about it - it was the sort of smak on bottom in moment of loss of control.

I have rarely smacked my dd1 and not hard. I now realise that you have to be very careful because all children are diferent. Also, assuming that your parents aren't sadists, and mine weren' t (we are a close family despite my sister's feelings), you have to keep an eye on what else is going on. My mopther was hospitalized with PND after my sister and I suspect my sister was far more sensitive than I because of this early trauma. So now, having always said I didn'tthink it was a big deal to 'tap' a hand (and I basically don't if say that hand is going near a stove) I think it's difficlut to be sure how smacking will effect a child and I will try never to do it!

J

ps school uniform made life easier at school for me. we were less well off than other people and so (whereas in 6th form where no school uniform rules applied it turned into a fashion competition)) you were not under constant pressure to look as good/ have as many clothes as other people.

Jimjams · 10/06/2004 17:55

They should do what they do in Japan. After being accepted at a school you go to have a look around and you are handed a bag containing your entire school uniform. No idea what happens when you grow though

I like school uniform as ds1's is cheap.

tigermoth · 11/06/2004 00:43

two, your experience of smacking in your family is exactly why it's impossible for me to say that smacking is morally right or wrong. When children's reactions can vary so much, how can a parent ever really know if a smack is ok or not ok? I feel uncomfortable making general moral judgements about smacking for that reason.
Mind you I feel uncomfortable about making general moral judgements on most aspects of parenting.

As for the argument that smacking is always wrong because violence against children is always wrong, sorry but I don't go for that entirely,(though it's a much, much, better argument IMO than don't smack because violence is always wrong). Is it always wrong to force a struggling child into their car seat for their own safety or to restrain with a firm hold a tantrumming toddler? Both these things could hurt a child than a tap on the hand. My two sons playfight like mad when they are in the mood, totally enjoy the rough and tumble together. Is this violence too? is it wrong? should it always be stopped immediatly then? It doesn't feel wrong to me, unless it goes over a certain limit. Then I do try to stop it.

Having said that, I'd support a law against smacking if it was a proven deterrant to abuse - no grey area there IMO.

sorry to drag this thread back to smacking. I've been so busy I haven't had time to post earlier.

bloss · 11/06/2004 03:36

Message withdrawn

two · 11/06/2004 11:40

Tigermoth

agree with what you say re smacking.

I was devastated by what my sister said - it came as a real shock because my parents were never cruel. It was like a hidden aspect of her life and I think it was brave of her to tell me cos she knows I am very close to my father.

Re abuse, I don't think an anti-smacking law will affect levels of abuse. My sister (mentally handicapped) has been abused in virtually every care situation she has been in - local authority that is. It is standard, though covered up and accepted by weak and colluding social workers across the land (meaning my mother looked after her til my sister was 40, more or less full-tim - and my mother was dead on her feet). Abuse in and out of the home has nothing to do with mothers infrequently smacking the bottoms, hands of children when they are playing up. I think most

Abuse - as someone pointed out here - comes in may different forms. I personally - and controversially - feel that dumping babies in fulltime childcare is pretty callous and insenstive. But few people question that practice. The idea of sulking with your child, as someone mentioned here, is horribly cruel.

Also, the systematic use of violence eg taking a child to one side to administer it in a premeditated way as the way in which a child is punished in very cruel. Like you say, struggling with a child to get them into a car seat which is aabout asserting your strength over the child's is a neccessary form of physical dominance for teirown saftey.

also, most children know that if a smack on their hand is likely to come their way if they tip their meal on the floor they don't do it, so smacking is a deterrent, something that DOESN'T get used unless you drive mummy BONKERS!And even in this case, you know yourself asa parent that you are unlikely to use it.

I don't think most people ENJOY hitting their children unless they are sadists. But sometimes they are frightened because a child runs into the road/ runs away (the only two times when i actually recall being smacked) and in fact I am assuming that most children will remember why their parents lost control (as I do). Or maybe you know yourslef, as a child, that you are pushing the boundaries and winding your mum/dad up.

Also, punishment for really doingg something you know as a child, because you habve been told it is wrong - eg hitting your sister or brother - in some ways is supposed to upset you. To drive the message home. Youi can't get round that. SO it is always difficult to discipline children because at some level you are going to make them temporarily unhappy. Life isn'ty a bed of roses and I think the home has to prepare children for the fact. In the home, it can be done in the context of love.

Anyway, that's a rable - back to work!

J

New posts on this thread. Refresh page