I think I was being baity with my last reply and I'm sorry. I will try and clarify why I have overreacted about something that doesn't really matter in the grand scheme things!
I thought I had answered the op sympathetically and shared my own experience with the change in parenting style I had made between dc1 and the following children.
Dc1 ate everything put in front of her. Then almost overnight, around 6 or 7 she went form eating almost anything to eating almost nothing. We gave alternatives, we had battles of will/control, we tried the licking thing, you name it, we probably tried it.
Then she told us she didn't like the texture of onion. So I stopped using onion and it all improved slowly. Now, at 12 she will try most things.
So now dc3 is turning her nose up at every meal, there is no battle/arguing discussion. There is one meal. Everyone is expected to try a bit - so tonight is chilli. Everyone will have a dessert spoon of chilli with their rice. Those that want more can have more, those that don't can have more plain rice. Doesn't matter.
Chilli was chosen this week by dd1. Most weeks, the dc choose a meal so that everyone gets a 'favourite' meal certainly every fortnight. Hence the carbonara.
So, I made my original post and it was followed by yours - about hypocritical parents feeding their children things they don't like but not doing the same themselves. And I read it as I a controlling parent who was going to create food issues for my dc (therefore damaging them?).
Then I get told I'm daft for eating something I don't like by another poster! Which maybe is the case but I hope I have explained the logic behind it in this post.
So yes, I did overreact and I apologise if you felt it was a personal attack. I only ever came onto this thread to try and offer support.
Now I'm off to enjoy chilli with my dc...