sophable: agree entirely about being comfortable with the symbol you wear (and they're very powerful symbols - great viral marketing idea that you'll note other charities are starting to use too - awareness bands for poverty, pink ribbons for breast cancer etc). Also, not everyone wants to advertise what charities they give to and symbols on a jacket are an anathema to them. Each to their own.
If I'm honest, what does the red poppy mean to me? It means childhood nostalgia of getting that perfectly made little flower, with lovely stiff paper... feeling the texture through my fingers and best of all... being trusted to use a REAL PIN!!! That's why, for me, the silence is the more grown up serious bit.
soapbox: "Georgina - if the British Legion does not support these families - who will?" I honestly don't know. Who will perform sea rescues without the RNLI? Would we, as a society, cope without an Age Concern or the Samaritans or Greenpeace or... the list goes ever on, doesn't it?
I just personally feel quite strongly against ANYONE'S personal choice of charitable giving being vilified, especially those where a lot of thought has gone into it. I also believe that charities should be accountable to its donors, and part of that accountability is for people to choose to donate their money elsewhere.
And I will also stand up here and state that I know I don't give enough to charitable causes.