That may be foisting them on to a 6 year old whilst you go out to work in a factory or tying them to a board (native Americans) or the 1m UK domestic servants circa 1900 but it is universally so - that most women of sense know hours of childcare is pretty dull
That is so many shades of stupid I don't know where to begin.
The absolute divide between wage labour and domestic work is a relatively recent one and dates back no further than the industrial revolution. It isn't inevitable and it is a cultural construct.
You don't really imagine facotry and mill workers of the Nineteenth century thought- '10 hours of backbreaking repatative labour for a pittance, now that'll be an enrriching experience that'll push the gender boundries' Of course not, it was a product of economic neccesity as wages in the cotton districts of the North-West were so low that they couldn't be supported on the wages of a sole male earner. It was a product of neccesity an family survial, not choice.
As others have said, the vast majority of domestic servants were 'maids of all work' not Nannies. They would perform drudge work around the house, not childcare.
Sorry Xenia, that isn't the case that all women in all cultures palm childcare off on a minion at the first opportunity.
As you've done throughout this thread, you've taken your own opinions and values and treated them as universal truths, when they really aren't.