Hi! I'm new-ish to Mumsnet, have only posted twice before, but today I read this article in the Sunday Times which really made me angry, and I was wondering if anyone else had seen it and what you thought. Basically the author went on in a VERY unkind way about stay-at-home mothers and how they might enjoy their existence now while their children are young, but will regret it later. Which is a fair point and something I do worry about sometimes, but what I didn't like was that she made it sound as if all SAHM's had husbands who are loaded, so that they drive around in their 4X4's, see their personal trainer every day and pop out to lunch all the time, not really bothering with the children at all, only 'using their fertility as an excuse' (this line actually ended the article). I mean, where does she live - what planet is she on? I am a SAHM and several of my friends are as well, but we are by no means rich and the reason we're at home is that at the moment we very much enjoy being with the children, more than being at work anyway, and we can just about afford to live on one income, so we're lucky that way - but this might change tomorrow or next year and then my decision might change - I don't know. But why write such a hostile article about SAHM's? Am I the exception, and most SAHM's are just using their children as an excuse to be a bit of a parasite? Find that hard to imagine!
Anyway, what did you think?
Oh, here's the link by the way, only I can't do it properly yet, sorry!
www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2092-841478,00.html