Been reading so many threads about terrible mothers-in-law and it got me thinking - why is it that so many seem to have a troubled relationship. With the exception of the out and out nutters (I've read a few threads where it sounds like the old trout needs a straight jacket!), I'm assuming that these are people who function day to day in the 'sane' world! So. What is it about the in-law relationship that is so hard?
Is it a power struggle between the mum and the wife? Mum not wanting to let her 'little soldier' go? Wife wanting mil to know that she comes first now and mil must take a back seat - son has formed his own family and his mum has been downgraded to 'extended family'?
Is it something to do with the mother-son relationship, because it seems that many more women have a problem with a mad mil than men do?
Are people less tolerant of the in-laws than their own blood relatives and want to have a sort of family order where their blood relatives are 'higher' than their in-laws?
Do mothers of sons find it harder to let go than mothers of daughters?
I think of my sons and their future and I hope they find someone who loves them. If they are lucky enough to find somebody who loves them I can tell you now that person will not get any trouble from me. Anyone who loves my child and makes my child happy will be my new best friend and I can't understand any mother not feeling that way, or feeling somehow in competition with the dil.
Surely the point of having a child is to guide them and raise them and help them to get to a point when they don't need you any more (iyswim) and so, if you did your job properly, you should trust that the choices they make will be right for them and you should respect their choice and be happy that they are loved.
It's just weird to be a cow to someone who loves your child and makes your child happy and it seems a very selfish way to behave (and a bit Freudian - if you get my drift!!!!!!!!!)