Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Mumsnet campaigns

For more information on Mumsnet Campaigns, check our our Campaigns hub.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Need your help with pre smartphone youth photos for new Rage Against the Screens campaign

142 replies

JustineMumsnet · 12/05/2026 15:05

Hi all,
We’re looking for real photos from Mumsnetters’ gloriously pre-smartphone youths for a new Mumsnet ad campaign about getting kids off screens and back into real life (part of our wider Rage Against the Screen campaign).

We’re calling it Your Mum Thinks You Should Live a Little and the basic message to teens is:

  1. Your mum was actually quite cool once
  2. There’s more to life than staring at a screen and your mum wants you to go out and live it

It’s a celebration of the slightly chaotic, occasionally misspent, entirely offline lives we were living before social media arrived.
Think:

  • blurry disposable-camera nights out
  • giant trousers and tiny tops
  • first festivals
  • dodgy fringes
  • snogging behind the bike sheds
  • actual hobbies
  • friendship groups that existed in 3D
  • rave/goth/indie/skater/grunge pics
  • terrible fashion choices
  • chaotic holidays
  • badly decorated teenage bedrooms
  • anything that screams “1990s”

If you’d like to contribute, upload your photos here.
If we’d keen to use any as part of the campaign, we’ll of course contact you directly first.

We’ve shared a few examples below to get everyone started. Let us know what you think?
Thanks,
Justine

OP posts:
LittleMissClutter · 12/05/2026 19:13

If this is aimed at teens, are you not worried they may take the last photo as being encouraged to photograph each other naked?

It just looks a wee bit out of place.

CorporalKlingfilm · 12/05/2026 19:26

Yes, can we lose the naked teenage girls?

LittleMissClutter · 12/05/2026 19:37

CorporalKlingfilm · 12/05/2026 19:26

Yes, can we lose the naked teenage girls?

It doesn't sit right in this context, does it?

And could be seen as encouragement.

And of course the difference between now and 'way back when', is that whoever took the photo won't have uploaded it to social media.

A real risk today that wasn't around back then.

NotTheOrdinary · 12/05/2026 19:47

The photo of naked teenage girls is not cool.

Waybackwhen2018 · 12/05/2026 19:50

Surely the whole conception of this idea goes against everything that has ever been known about teen psychology (also agree about the photo, even odder).

JustGotToKeepOnKeepingOn · 12/05/2026 19:52

I’m not sure how those photos would persuade anyone to put their phone down? They don’t look any different to the photos you see on any smartphone 🤷🏼‍♀️

Angelf1sh · 12/05/2026 19:53

Anything your mum did is inherently not cool from the get-go, so this feels pointless. Uploading photos online to encourage your kids to get offline feels oxymoronic. Uploading naked photos of teen girls to make any point at all is just plain moronic.

NotTheOrdinary · 12/05/2026 19:55

I'm surprised the naked teenage girl photo made it through the MN photo filter.

Error404FucksNotFound · 12/05/2026 20:08

Seriously?
You have a picture of 3 naked teens there?

What on earth? Why did you choose that picture? Is that an example of what you're wanting us to upload?

LittleMissClutter · 12/05/2026 20:09

NotTheOrdinary · 12/05/2026 19:55

I'm surprised the naked teenage girl photo made it through the MN photo filter.

Yes, I remember someone complaining her yorkshire puddings didn't make it through 😁

JustineMumsnet · 12/05/2026 20:15

Fair challenge - and to be clear, the intention absolutely isn’t to encourage kids to share nude photos.

The image makes more sense alongside the strapline it was designed for: “Your mum didn’t send nudes. She was nude.” The broader point of the campaign is that previous generations experienced freedom, rebellion, friendships, boredom, messiness and real life offline, rather than through phones and social media.
But point taken that, separated from the line and context, the image can land differently.

The overall aim of the campaign is very much the opposite: to encourage kids to spend less of their lives online and more of it actually living. And it's meant to be a little bit provocative.

OP posts:
acres11 · 12/05/2026 20:18

LOVE this idea. Will dig out some photos.

AVerySeriousCat · 12/05/2026 21:03

Even with the strapline…..what on earth were you thinking??? Who is behind wanting to use photos of naked girls/young women? Not provocative just very weird.

FireBucket · 12/05/2026 21:47

Do you think an invitation to picture their mother naked is likely to appeal to a teen audience?

LittleMissClutter · 12/05/2026 21:51

JustineMumsnet · 12/05/2026 20:15

Fair challenge - and to be clear, the intention absolutely isn’t to encourage kids to share nude photos.

The image makes more sense alongside the strapline it was designed for: “Your mum didn’t send nudes. She was nude.” The broader point of the campaign is that previous generations experienced freedom, rebellion, friendships, boredom, messiness and real life offline, rather than through phones and social media.
But point taken that, separated from the line and context, the image can land differently.

The overall aim of the campaign is very much the opposite: to encourage kids to spend less of their lives online and more of it actually living. And it's meant to be a little bit provocative.

Ahh ok, thanks for the explanation.

However, even with the strapline I can't convince myself it's not inappropriate for a campaign aimed at kids/teenagers.

Glitterbiscuits · 12/05/2026 21:53

Doesn’t matter how you tag it, the nudes are out of keeping.

MoshpitAtMorrisons · 12/05/2026 21:54

It was brilliant until the naked children - then it got totally weird!! I don’t even get the strap line behind that, I don’t think that is necessary whatsoever.

wow217 · 12/05/2026 22:08

I am actually shocked at the nude pic, and I can't believe you actually think you can explain it away.

AVerySeriousCat · 12/05/2026 22:28

LittleMissClutter · 12/05/2026 21:51

Ahh ok, thanks for the explanation.

However, even with the strapline I can't convince myself it's not inappropriate for a campaign aimed at kids/teenagers.

And they want kids to listen to mum about having less screen time, yet most kids would stop listening to their parents the minute they started talking about bringing naked themselves. Imagine saying to your teen ‘I didn’t send nudes, I was nude’……instant shut down from your average teen. It’s honestly clueless and someone needs sacking for coming up with such inappropriate shite, but that also completely misreads teenagers.

FireBucket · 12/05/2026 22:29

Waybackwhen2018 · 12/05/2026 19:50

Surely the whole conception of this idea goes against everything that has ever been known about teen psychology (also agree about the photo, even odder).

Yeah, I'm struggling to think of a single thing a teenager would find more horrifying than a picture of their mother naked.

Jasminealive · 12/05/2026 22:31

It’s a Ryan McGinley print, he was obsessed with taking photos of naked teens. He was older.

Are you going to be paying people for the usage in your ad campaign?

LittleMissClutter · 12/05/2026 22:35

Jasminealive · 12/05/2026 22:31

It’s a Ryan McGinley print, he was obsessed with taking photos of naked teens. He was older.

Are you going to be paying people for the usage in your ad campaign?

Oh gosh I'd never heard of Ryan McGinley so I googled him and stumbled across a naked teen orgy in a tree! 😳

Jasminealive · 12/05/2026 22:35

The image makes more sense alongside the strapline it was designed for: “Your mum didn’t send nudes. She was nude.”

what the hell. What the actual hell. This sounds downright creepy. What ad agency came up with that? It’s appalling.

Jasminealive · 12/05/2026 22:41

I tried to reverse google photo search to double check if it was one of his and it told me it wasn’t allowed to search as it breached legal guidelines…..

FireBucket · 12/05/2026 22:53

Jasminealive · 12/05/2026 22:35

The image makes more sense alongside the strapline it was designed for: “Your mum didn’t send nudes. She was nude.”

what the hell. What the actual hell. This sounds downright creepy. What ad agency came up with that? It’s appalling.

If an ad agency came up with any of this, MNHQ should ask for their money back. Even if we put aside the nude pictures for a minute, we’re talking about teenagers here, I'm sorry but teens find their mums embarrassing and uncool and they don’t want to do what they’re told, this campaign seems perfectly tailored to put them right off.

Swipe left for the next trending thread