Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Mumsnet campaigns

For more information on Mumsnet Campaigns, check our our Campaigns hub.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

The refugee crisis: official MNHQ thread to discuss next steps for a campaign

139 replies

RowanMumsnet · 11/09/2015 14:55

Hello

Following on from previous threads (here and here), we've spent a couple of days looking in to this. As you can imagine, lots of the organisations working on this are extremely busy at the moment so it's taken us a little while to pin down some relevant info - sorry for the delay.

On search and rescue in the Med: the UK government now contributes what several organisations say is a pretty sizeable package of resources to the EU's Mediterranean search and rescue effort. One organisation told us that 'the UK has totally stepped up; we now have more resources in the water than any other EU country'. The thinking seems to be that given the size of the Med, and the desperately unsafe boats/dinghies that are being used, there is just no way to guarantee that people will not drown; the consensus seems to be that the best focus would be on providing safer routes to countries of refuge in the EU, and a better welcome for refugees once they're here.

That doesn't mean we can't focus on search and rescue if you still think we should. There are organisations like Medicins sans Frontieres and MOAS, who are using donations to run their own search and rescue missions, and we can give them a big push and help you to encourage more private donations to them. But it's worth noting that most organisations in the field seem to think that if there is an insufficiency in EU search and rescue, it's not because of the UK government.

There is also a current initiative by Save the Children that we could swing behind, and perhaps do some joint campaigning on. It's based on a five-point plan of action for EU governments, calling for the following:

  • maintaining search and rescue, and making sure EU operations have adequate resources and the right mandate (ie that they concentrate on saving lives, not on border protection);
  • providing safe and legal routes into Europe for refugees, with a particular emphasis on the rights and safety of children;
  • providing proper reception and support for refugees in EU countries, including minimum standards for things like shelter, medical treatment, legal advice, and access to health and education facilities;
  • an effective, balanced and mandatory relocation and resettlement agreement for refugees, involving all EU countries (eg mandatory quotas for numbers each country must take); and
  • tackling the root causes of unsafe migration. This involves things like putting international pressure on the warring parties in Syria to end the conflict; supporting Syria's neighbouring countries (where most refugees from Syria are living, often in camps) by fully funding the Regional Refugee and Resilience plan (currently only 40% funded); and assisting the World Food Programme to re-start its food aid programme in Jordan, which was recently suspended due to lack of money.

Save the Children are also asking the UK government to commit to taking in 3000 unaccompanied child refugees, who sadly are already in Europe without any adult protection.

Let us know your thoughts working with Save the Children on these two things (the 5-point plan, and asking the UK government to commit to taking 3000 unaccompanied child refugees from within the EU). It seems like a comprehensive proposal to us, but of course ultimately it's up to you.

We've also got this page full of links to various actions you can take if you want to do something on an individual basis.

Thanks
MNHQ

OP posts:
PlentyOfPubeGardens · 12/09/2015 09:26

Adding my support for the Save the Children plan.

MorrisZapp · 12/09/2015 09:33

This is exactly what we should be doing. Nobody better than aid agencies on the ground to say exactly what's needed, and most people have trust in Save the Children. I'm sure we'll all back this, I certainly do. Great idea.

TelephoneIgnoringMachine · 12/09/2015 09:35

I also support backing the Save the Children campaign.

AliceDoesntLiveHereAnymore · 12/09/2015 10:35

Definitely support aligning with Save the Children.

Samcro · 12/09/2015 10:37

catzpyjamas thanks, interesting read, but doesn't say who will fund care in uk

Abraid2 · 12/09/2015 10:40

I have concern about the 3,000 unaccompanied minors. Where would they live and who would look after them? That is a lot of children and frankly our local authorities don't have a good record of taking care of minors. Are there minority/non minority groups who would arrange for fostering? Many fostering services have been reduced in recent years.

labourlist.org/2015/09/if-we-are-to-take-more-syrian-refugees-labour-needs-to-call-for-more-foster-placements/

Samcro · 12/09/2015 10:56

it has cost kent ss a lot to look after the 700 they have already
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jul/30/kent-social-services-struggling-to-cope-with-children-seeking-asylum

Iqueen · 12/09/2015 10:58

Headofthehive55 I can't agree with this.

So, we leave these children and infants to whatever their fate, because we haven't got the First World resources to provide for them?

Anything we can provide for these children is better than their wandering on a strange continent, without guardians, and nothing, but the clothes they stand up in.

I would happily give 10% of my annual income (£800) towards providing their care and safety.

HappyGoLuckyGirl · 12/09/2015 11:14

I'd definitely support the alignment with Save the Children.

weaseleyes · 12/09/2015 11:26

Happy to support.

waxinganowl · 12/09/2015 12:00

I also support aligning with Save The Children

Struckbylightning · 12/09/2015 13:38

I support this suggestion too.

glenthebattleostrich · 12/09/2015 15:42

I broadly support the save the children campaign, however I don't agree with forced quotas. It is however good to read about a campaign which wants to address the push, as well as address the pull towards Europe.

The push is what really needs to be removed, so more pressure on Syria, possibly with boots on the ground to end the conflict. We need to provide support for those opposing ISIS.

I definitely agree with more support for Jordan and the food aid programme, which would again remove some of the push.

Whilst I agree that the 3000 unaccompanied minors need to be supported, we need to ensure we can adequately do so. Where will they live, where will they be educated, can they access adequate healthcare? Where will the money come from for this? It is pointless to bring them to the UK without support in place or they will fall through the cracks and this is not more acceptable than the conditions they are in now.

ThoseAwfulCurtains · 12/09/2015 15:51

I'd support MN backing the The Save The Children initiative

InternalMonologue · 12/09/2015 15:52

I think an alignment with TV Save the Children campaign makes sense for MN. Supporting here.

Discogeek · 12/09/2015 16:04

Fully in agreement with MN backing the Save the Children campaign.

I

Headofthehive55 · 12/09/2015 16:19

It's not always about the money iqueen. It's about who, will be foster carers? You can't invite people in without knowing you can care for them. Just by offering money does not mean people apply for the job!

Soundsystem · 12/09/2015 18:20

Another one in full agreement with backing the Save the Children campaign here

OhYouBadBadKitten · 12/09/2015 18:34

I would support the Save the children campaign, but I am just slightly worried about the risk of it encouraging more families to abandon children in the hope that it will keep them safe. Is it better for families to try to keep together or better for children to be relocated by themselves? I am undecided....

MarmeeMarch · 12/09/2015 19:00

I support backing save the children

FuckTheseSixFishInParticular · 12/09/2015 19:53

I support backing the Save the Children campaign.

MajesticWhine · 12/09/2015 21:09

I agree broadly with the save the children plan. So it's a Yes from me.

Hufflepuffin · 12/09/2015 21:12

I agree with promoting the save the children initiatives. I'd also support encouraging people to donate cash rather than (eg) nappies as that seems to be the most efficient way to use our money to help people.

RoboticSealpup · 12/09/2015 22:11

I support the Save the Children plan.

UnderTheGreenwoodTree · 12/09/2015 22:19

Those able to donate cash: both Save The Children and Medicins Sans Frontieres are excellent charities, both doing amazing work on the ground, and on the sea.

Swipe left for the next trending thread