Spotted this thread earlier today:
Did anyone see Daybreak this morning where a woman representing Bounty claimed Mumsnet was in competition
www.itv.com/itvplayer/daybreak
6:43am Interview with Mumsnet rep
7.43am Interview with Bounty rep, including interview with Health Minister.
Bounty Rep stated that MN set up the survey deliberately in a way to invite criticism and lead women into saying they didn't agree with Bounty. (They didn't 'accept' Mumsnet's survey).
Ironically Daybreak's own survey said that 98% of viewers thought that sales reps should be banned from maternity wards.
My response to the programme and Bounty after having watched it is the following:
Dear Bounty Spokesperson.
Mumsnet are the competition? So how many contracts do they have with NHS Trusts? Do Mumsnet directly approach women in hospital without invitation?
Mumsnet make money from advertising. They do not however use aggressive sales practices to do this because they do not have sales reps on maternity wards.
Bounty's main source of income comes from selling photographs and collecting data for sale to other groups from direct contact with women on maternity wards.
Would you like to explain why they are the competition when actually they work in completely different ways?
I think you may be completely missing the point about why there is an issue here. Its not about advertising revenue and how you both may have similar customers; its about HOW you go about making contact with women and whether its aggressive and intrusive or not.
Perhaps you could stop putting the idea of money making, ahead of women you claim to serve. You know... a bit more in line with Mumsnet's business model which aims to work with women, building a trust and listening to their concerns, rather than see them as something to simply be exploited. Working with women seems to be a lucrative marketing approach for MN...
Would you also like to explain why this issue has been in The Telegraph, The Independent and Guardian, long before MN picked up the cause. Would you also like to explain why North Lancashire NHS Trust decided in 2009 to stop using Bounty because of the 'wider public health and clinic governance issues'. Why did they do this? Is this because they are Bounty's competitors.
Can you explain why 19,000 people have signed a petition and many of them have posted why they support the petition based on personal experience. Did Mumsnet put them up to it? Did Mumsnet stir up so many people into some sort of hysterical reaction out of nothing?
Don't you think thats a tiny bit patronising, and frankly dismissive and rude, to all the women who shared their stories? Many of which are very emotional and personal.
Oh and what about the 10% of mothers who aren't happy with you, according to your OWN surveys?
If anything, Mumsnet stance is more likely to damage them as it, hopefully, will force you to adjust your business practices and will make you more likely, to put you into direct competition rather than in different areas of the same market.
You are, cynical, vindictive vultures who will stop at nothing and have no conscious about how low you will stoop to carry on with the way you have done things for years. If you weren't you wouldn't be defending yourself in this way.
Ad hominem attacks are the last resort of those who can not attack their 'opponent's' arguments.
Perhaps you would like to truly review what your practices are and get the fuck off maternity wards.
^I think the word you are struggling to find and say is "Sorry".
Yours
Lovingly and Affectionately
RedToothBrush
xxx