Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Could I be charged with fraud?

244 replies

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 12:43

My dad died a few years ago & he left his estate to me & my brother. My db asked me to look after his share of money. At the time he told me it was because he wasn't very responsible with money & I knew more about where to invest etc. So I've had all the money in my name in various accounts & just transferred him money if he needed it for holidays etc.

I'm not particularly close to him & didn't know much about his work situation. He's always been a bit cagey about it so i don't ask. I now know he is on benefits & after seeing a post on here recently, I realised he wanted me to look after his money so he could carry on receiving benefits.

If there are investigations in the future could I just say that I wasn't aware of his benefit situation? Or will I or he be charged with fraud?

OP posts:
Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:25

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 19:20

Yes because I'm good with money & chose investments wisely. Quite enjoy it actually so I didn't mind at all being in control of our money. All it then takes is for me to transfer money to him when he needs it for holidays etc

But no, we're not close and I have no idea about his day to day life

Well turns out not that good… because you never seemed to probe your brother what other income he had or whether he even had a job.

What amount are we talking about?

Jane143 · 25/03/2026 19:25

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 19:17

He's had quite a bit of his money already in dribs & drabs over the years, for instance to pay for holidays. He doesn't have a huge amount left actually

At this point in time after all these years just carry on until it’s gone, it’s not your fault

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:27

It didn’t strike you as odd that someone you appear to have next to no relationship with asked you to take all his inheritance and then given him dribs and drabs?

thanks2 · 25/03/2026 19:27

I do understand - my accountant sister was good with money so helped me manage mine. But did you give him cash or transfer him money? If you transfered there would be a record in his account of it.

User9138383 · 25/03/2026 19:28

Lougle · 25/03/2026 19:22

You don't 'prove it'. You declare it. You put it in the 'any other savings' section of your savings declaration in the journal. For example, I deal with DD1's money. She has some money in her account, and some that I receive on her behalf and keep in my account for day to day spending. Once per month, I declare that portion of her money that sits in my bank account alongside the money that is in her account.

i cant access it. She wont give me money it is not legally mine. If i need something then she buys it for me. that is instead of her giving me the cash. I dont need to tell DWP when she buys me things.

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:29

thanks2 · 25/03/2026 19:27

I do understand - my accountant sister was good with money so helped me manage mine. But did you give him cash or transfer him money? If you transfered there would be a record in his account of it.

Were you close to her?

did she at least know whether you had a job or not?

Aluna · 25/03/2026 19:31

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 19:17

He's had quite a bit of his money already in dribs & drabs over the years, for instance to pay for holidays. He doesn't have a huge amount left actually

Ok so that implicates you directly. If you’d simply invested it for him you could argue you weren’t in touch & knew nothing about his finances. But you’ve been in touch passing it to him over the years so his claim that he wanted you to guard it so he didn’t spend it doesn’t ring true as he has been spending it.

How many years has this been going on? How much in total?

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 19:32

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:27

It didn’t strike you as odd that someone you appear to have next to no relationship with asked you to take all his inheritance and then given him dribs and drabs?

No because it wasn't some random person handing over money for me to look after. The money was already all together in the executor's account & he asked me to invest it all

OP posts:
Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:32

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

candyflossbabe · 25/03/2026 19:37

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 25/03/2026 12:44

The fraud isn’t yours, it’s his. He’s the one claiming not you.

They couldn’t prove beyond reasonable doubt that you knew.

Don't worry.

This is completely incorrect.
I appreciate you probably meant well but that’s not how the law works.
Fraud offences can include additional parties as co-conspirators to put it in layman’s terms.

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 19:37

Aluna · 25/03/2026 19:31

Ok so that implicates you directly. If you’d simply invested it for him you could argue you weren’t in touch & knew nothing about his finances. But you’ve been in touch passing it to him over the years so his claim that he wanted you to guard it so he didn’t spend it doesn’t ring true as he has been spending it.

How many years has this been going on? How much in total?

It's been nearly 4 years. He's had about 60% of the money, the majority spent on holidays. He is shit with money, having already been bankrupt many years ago. My OP didn't say that he didn't want to spend any, it said that he wasn't very responsible with money. I also said in my OP that I had been sending him his money when he wanted it

OP posts:
Arran2024 · 25/03/2026 19:38

JustAnotherWhinger · 25/03/2026 18:55

You still deprived yourself of 10k in terms of benefits.

You won’t have any issues because it wasn’t legally traceable to you and presumably if asked your mum would just say she wasn’t gifting you 10k to match your siblings.

Technically though what you did, regardless of reason, is fraud. Just happens to be fraud that you could never be caught for.

No she didn't. She didn't receive an inheritance, and her mother didn't gift her anything. She isn't responsible for her mother's decisions!

I have an adult daughter with substantial additional needs who will never work. She gets benefits and she lives with me. I inherited money from my late dad's estate last year. If I take her to the seaside for the day and treat her, that does not mean she is hiding an inheritance from the DWP!! And this is exactly the situation the poster is describing.

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JLou08 · 25/03/2026 19:40

I don't know the legalities, but I'd never hold someone else's money. I imagine holding someone else's money could leave you open to being culpable of money laundering

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

JustAnotherWhinger · 25/03/2026 19:41

Arran2024 · 25/03/2026 19:38

No she didn't. She didn't receive an inheritance, and her mother didn't gift her anything. She isn't responsible for her mother's decisions!

I have an adult daughter with substantial additional needs who will never work. She gets benefits and she lives with me. I inherited money from my late dad's estate last year. If I take her to the seaside for the day and treat her, that does not mean she is hiding an inheritance from the DWP!! And this is exactly the situation the poster is describing.

That’s vastly different from the poster being gifted 10k, same as her siblings, but keeping it in her mother’s account.

She even refers to the fact that once ‘her’ 10k runs out she won’t get anymore, and that it was done to stop her spending it all quickly.

They both class it as her money (hence her concern at the thread in the first place). She will absolutely get away with it because it’s not on paper so no way if it being picked up. But it was absolutely done in a way to hide the fact she has the benefit of the 10k from the DWP.

JustAnotherWhinger · 25/03/2026 19:42

BiscoffCheesecakes · 25/03/2026 19:37

It's been nearly 4 years. He's had about 60% of the money, the majority spent on holidays. He is shit with money, having already been bankrupt many years ago. My OP didn't say that he didn't want to spend any, it said that he wasn't very responsible with money. I also said in my OP that I had been sending him his money when he wanted it

Edited

How much does he have left?

Allseeingallknowing · 25/03/2026 19:42

Arran2024 · 25/03/2026 19:38

No she didn't. She didn't receive an inheritance, and her mother didn't gift her anything. She isn't responsible for her mother's decisions!

I have an adult daughter with substantial additional needs who will never work. She gets benefits and she lives with me. I inherited money from my late dad's estate last year. If I take her to the seaside for the day and treat her, that does not mean she is hiding an inheritance from the DWP!! And this is exactly the situation the poster is describing.

It’s not the same situation!

Okrose · 25/03/2026 19:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Crikeyalmighty · 25/03/2026 19:52

Lougle · 25/03/2026 19:01

If it's a disabled discretionary trust then it's legal. The money is not hers because it has been signed over to a trustee who is allowed to spend it or invest it as they see fit. If they choose to use some of the money for her benefit they can, but they don't have to, so it isn't counted as hers, even if it was left to her.

Yes I believe that is how it was done - I’m totally sure it was all above board , it just seemed off of I’m honest as whilst odd ,she’s perfectly capable of trips away , managing her money day to day and living a normal life in her 50s , doesn’t need any kind of ongoing care. I do think it’s a bit of a questionable loophole that whilst totally appropriate in the right cases could be taken advantage of .

Charlize43 · 25/03/2026 19:54

Isn't there a benefits fraud line to ring? Morally this is reprehensible as he should have declared his inheritance and come off benefits instead of continuing to suck from the tax payer.

candyflossbabe · 25/03/2026 19:56

There are far too many people on here that are blasé about giving an opinion in the form of legal advice. 😱
Politely if you don’t specialise in an area, don’t do anything more than an “I think…..”

I am a prosecuting fraud investigator and I would darn well be considering you as a potential co-conspirator. Sorry to scare you OP but if anything comes to light on this, you will be looked at!

Fraud can be committed on behalf of another person and there are several ways and laws about this!

What would probably be your saving grace will be the capacity to prove knowing/intent, and yes for criminal prosecution that is a high threshold BUT it’s not a get out of jail free card particular with an immediate family member 🤷🏻‍♀️

People also need to remember many employment contracts require you to disclose if you become subject to legal action and i swear hands down many employers would rather you be investigated for 💊 dealing than have a suspected fraudster in their midst 😬😬😬

I also can’t comment about what he could insinuate about you “keeping” his inheritance from him etc and executor responsibilities 🤷🏻‍♀️

I would 100% be depositing the whole amount to him by the weekend 😮‍💨

HarlanCobenDogshit · 25/03/2026 20:01

Let's be frank. You're complicant in hiding DB's money so he can carry on claiming benefits.

Fraud? No idea.
Morally bankrupt? 100%

Just stop with the faux innocence.